Regarding the Necessity of the RIF:
- Did the school board explore all other options for addressing the budget shortfall before resorting to a RIF?
- Were there any grants, fundraising efforts, or administrative cost-cutting measures considered?
- What is the severity of the budget shortfall, and how much will the proposed RIF save?
Regarding the Selection Process:
- Did the school board follow a documented and transparent process for selecting teachers for elimination?
- Were seniority rules, as outlined in the relevant West Virginia code sections, adhered to during the selection process?
- Were teachers' qualifications considered when deciding which positions to eliminate?
- For example, could some eliminated teachers potentially cover other subjects to minimize disruption?
Regarding the Impact of the RIF:
- How many teachers will be laid off in total, and from which subject areas?
- How will the elimination of these positions affect class sizes and student-to-teacher ratios in the impacted subjects?
- Are there alternative teachers available within the school system who could be certified to teach the subjects being cut?
- How will the elimination of these positions impact the availability of core subjects and elective options for students, particularly those interested in STEM fields?
Regarding the Potential Violation of Student Rights:
- Does the elimination of these core subjects (math and science) create a significant barrier for students seeking college admission and pursuing STEM careers?
- Are there alternative educational pathways available within the school system to compensate for the loss of these subjects?
By investigating these questions of fact, a clearer picture can be formed regarding the necessity and fairness of the proposed RIF. This information can be crucial in advocating for alternative solutions or potentially challenging the decision if it appears arbitrary or violates established procedures or student rights.
No comments:
Post a Comment