Important Note: It's crucial to gather information about the specific financial situation of PCHS. This will help determine the feasibility and effectiveness of these alternative cost-saving measures.
By demonstrating that the school board prioritized teacher cuts without exploring these or similar options, Johnnie's case can be strengthened by highlighting a lack of thorough consideration for all possibilities. This could ultimately influence the legal outcome.
1. Quantify the Increase:
- If possible, try to find information on the proposed number of teacher cuts and the current student population at PCHS. This will allow you to estimate the potential increase in class size, especially for math and science classes.
2. Research on Class Size:
- Include research findings that demonstrate the negative impact of larger class sizes on student learning. Studies often show a correlation between increased class size and decreased academic performance, student engagement, and teacher effectiveness.
3. Broaden the Scope:
- While Johnnie's case focuses on his engineering aspirations, emphasize that larger class sizes could negatively impact the educational experience of all PCHS students. This strengthens the argument that the decision harms the school community as a whole.
Here's an example of how you can integrate this point into the brief:
V. Potential Legal Challenges
A. Failure to Consider Alternatives
- Reducing the number of teachers would likely lead to an increase in class size, potentially exceeding recommended student-teacher ratios. Research suggests that larger class sizes can hinder student learning, engagement, and teacher effectiveness for all students, not just those interested in STEM fields like Johnnie.
By including this information, the brief strengthens the argument that the school board's decision is not only detrimental to Johnnie's specific needs but also has broader negative consequences for the quality of education at PCHS.
No comments:
Post a Comment