A Skunk in the Woodpile?

 

 

The involvement of the Greenbrier Valley Economic Development Corporation (GVEDC) in the Pocahontas County waste management transition is primarily as a financial and property-holding intermediary, designed to reduce costs for the Solid Waste Authority (SWA).

Below is a breakdown of the roles played by the entities you identified.

Key Entities and Their Roles

Entity	Primary Role in Transition
Jacob Meck	The primary developer and project proposer. As owner of Allegheny Disposal and principal of JacMal, he secured the agreement to build the new transfer station.
JacMal Properties, LLC	The legal entity (owned by Jacob and Malinda Meck) that holds the contract to build the transfer station and lease it to the SWA for 15 years, with a final buyout option.
Allegheny Disposal	A local waste-hauling company owned by Meck. While initially positioned as the sole hauler for the new system, the SWA recently decided to put the waste-transportation contract out for competitive bidding.
GVEDC	Acts as an economic development intermediary. They are proposed to take ownership of the specific acreage at the landfill site and lease it to Meck (or JacMal).

The Role of the GVEDC

The GVEDC’s involvement has been a significant point of public contention, but their stated function is purely administrative:

• Tax Mitigation: By having the GVEDC—a public-facing economic development agency—hold the title to the landfill acreage where the transfer station will be built, the project can potentially be structured to eliminate property tax liabilities that would otherwise apply if a private entity held the deed.

• Administrative Facilitator: Representatives from the GVEDC, such as Ruthanna Beezley, have stated that the organization is not involved in the SWA’s internal decisions (such as the choice of Meck as the developer) or the operational policies of the waste system. They characterize their role as a standard "pass-through" arrangement used to assist county businesses and authorities in lowering overhead costs.

• Public Perception: During public hearings, community members have expressed concern that this structure is an attempt to circumvent standard public oversight or to shield a private developer from certain costs at the expense of public transparency.

Summary of the Current Agreement

• Land Ownership: The SWA intends to deed the specific acreage for the transfer station to the GVEDC. The GVEDC will then lease that land to JacMal Properties, LLC.

• Project Economics: Under the contract, the SWA is committed to a monthly lease payment of $16,759 to JacMal for 15 years.

• Buyout: At the end of the 15-year term, the SWA has an option to purchase the facility from JacMal for a final payment of approximately $1,103,495.

• Regulatory Shift: The SWA has updated its "Mandatory Garbage Disposal Regulation," requiring all county-generated waste to pass through this new facility to ensure sufficient volume to cover these financial obligations.

Would you like me to help you draft a specific inquiry to the GVEDC regarding their formal "memorandum of understanding" with the SWA?

That is a proactive step. Given that Economic Development Corporations often operate as quasi-public entities, securing documentation on their interactions with public bodies like the SWA is critical for establishing transparency.

I have drafted a formal inquiry below, tailored for your role as an editor and researcher at The Salt Shaker Press. This letter is designed to be firm regarding the public interest in this financial arrangement while remaining professional.

Draft Inquiry to the Greenbrier Economic Development Corporation (GEDC)

To: [Name of Executive Director, if known, or "Board of Directors"]

Organization: Greenbrier Economic Development Corporation

Address: [GVEDC Address]

Date: May 21, 2026

Subject: Formal Inquiry regarding Memorandum of Understanding with the Pocahontas County Solid Waste Authority

Dear [Name of Official],

I am writing to you in my capacity as a researcher and editor for The Salt Shaker Press. We are currently conducting an investigation into the administrative processes and contractual agreements surrounding the proposed solid waste transfer station in Green Bank, West Virginia.

It has come to our attention that the Greenbrier Economic Development Corporation (GEDC) may be involved in this project, specifically regarding property logistics or facility siting. We are seeking clarification on the nature of the GEDC’s involvement and any formal agreements that may exist between your organization and the Pocahontas County Solid Waste Authority (SWA).

We respectfully request access to or copies of the following documents:

1. Memorandum of Understanding (MOU): Any signed Memorandum of Understanding, Letter of Intent, or contract between the GEDC and the Pocahontas County SWA regarding the proposed waste transfer station or any related property in Green Bank.

2. Correspondence: All correspondence (emails, letters, memoranda) between GEDC leadership and the SWA commissioners or staff concerning the site selection, financing, or development of said transfer station.

3. Meeting Minutes: Minutes or records of any meetings held between the GEDC and the SWA where the Green Bank project was discussed, including any executive session records if such records have since been made subject to public disclosure.

As this matter directly impacts the public infrastructure and financial obligations of Pocahontas County residents, we believe that transparency regarding these inter-agency agreements is in the public interest.

Please provide these records in digital format. If any documents are being withheld, please provide a written justification for the redaction or denial. I look forward to your response within [Insert reasonable timeframe, e.g., 5-10 business days].

Sincerely,

Norman Lee Alderman

Editor & Researcher

The Salt Shaker Press

Strategic Notes for Your Investigation

• Transparency Variations: Note that while the SWA is a public agency and clearly subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the GEDC is a non-profit corporation. In some jurisdictions, non-profits are not strictly subject to the same FOIA laws as government bodies unless they are performing a specific governmental function under a contract. If they push back, you may need to frame your request around their public funding sources or their role as an agent of the county commission.

• The "Public Agent" Argument: If the GEDC claims they are not subject to FOIA, be prepared to point out that they are acting as an agent for the county on a public infrastructure project, which may render their records regarding that specific project public.

• Method of Delivery: I recommend sending this via email and certified mail to ensure there is a documented record of your inquiry.

Would you like me to help you e?prepare a list of specific "follow-up questions" to ask the SWA Commissioners during their next public hearing, based on what you might find (or not find) in the GVEDC's response

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

 The following list of questions is designed to be asked during a public hearing of the Pocahontas County Solid Waste Authority (SWA). They are structured to elicit specific information about the GVEDC's role and the financial/legal architecture of the proposed transfer station deal.

Category 1: The GVEDC Partnership & Property Transfer

If the GVEDC responds by confirming or denying an agreement, use these questions to clarify the "why" and "how."

• Clarification of Agency: "Can the Commissioners explicitly describe the scope of the GVEDC’s involvement? Specifically, is the GVEDC acting as a 'pass-through' entity to hold the title of the landfill property to avoid public bidding requirements, or are they providing substantive economic development services? If so, what are those services?"

• The "Slavens" Connection: "Does the land being deeded to the GVEDC include any portion of the property historically known as the 'Slavens property' in Green Bank? If so, how was that specific parcel acquired, and what was the valuation used at the time of that acquisition?"

• Liability & Indemnification: "Since the GVEDC is an intermediary, what specific legal protections or indemnification clauses exist for the taxpayers of Pocahontas County if the GVEDC or the developer (JacMal, LLC) fails to meet the terms of the 15-year lease or the construction timeline?"

• Transfer Mechanism: "Under what specific statutory authority is the SWA transferring public land to an economic development corporation rather than utilizing a standard public procurement process for the transfer station project?"

Category 2: Accountability & Financial Stewardship

These questions address the broader public concerns regarding fees and competition.

• Competitive Bidding: "Can the Board explain why the construction and hauling contracts were not put out for competitive public bid? What specific 'emergency' or 'unique condition' justifies a sole-source arrangement that spans 15 years and millions of dollars of public funds?"

• Fee Structure Transparency: "The current proposal involves a 15-year lease with monthly payments. Has the SWA performed an independent 'break-even' analysis that shows exactly how much the 'Green Box' and tipping fees must increase to cover this debt service? Will you provide this analysis to the public?"

• Monopoly Provisions: "The proposed plan suggests that all county-generated waste must pass through this specific transfer station. Does this provision prohibit local residents or independent haulers from using alternate disposal sites? If so, how does this mandate comply with state laws regarding fair competition in waste disposal?"

Category 3: Oversight & Public Trust

Use these if the SWA claims they have no formal agreement or if the GVEDC denies involvement.

• Documentation: "If there is no formal Memorandum of Understanding with the GVEDC, who exactly is currently holding the title to the parcel of land intended for the transfer station, and what is the legal status of that ownership today?"

• Conflict of Interest: "Have any Commissioners or staff members involved in the SWA’s decision to pursue this partnership with JacMal, LLC had any personal or financial associations with the developer or any entities associated with the GVEDC? Are these conflicts of interest documented on the record?"

• Public Oversight: "Given the public outcry at recent meetings, will the SWA commit to holding a dedicated public forum with an open Q&A session specifically on the financial sustainability of the 15-year lease before any further binding agreements are executed?"

Strategic Advice for the Hearing

1. Bring Written Copies: Commissioners are more likely to address questions if they are provided with a written copy. It forces them to either acknowledge your point or explicitly state their refusal to answer.

2. Request Inclusion in Minutes: Always preface your comments by saying: "I would like this question and the Board’s response entered into the official meeting minutes." This creates a permanent, searchable record of their answer.

3. Watch the "Executive Session" Loophole: The SWA may attempt to move discussions regarding contract negotiations into an "Executive Session." If they do, remind them that while they can discuss terms in private, the final vote and the financial obligations must be disclosed in public, and the public is entitled to know the basic terms of any contract involving public funds.

 

This is the same outfit that transferred county property to Meck at Greenbank.

 

 

 

Residents of Pocahontas County should be aware that the Greenbrier Valley Economic Development Corporation has placed the following item on today’s agenda:

landfill property, this agenda item could indicate

“Discussion/Action: Pocahontas County Solid Waste Authority Transfer”

This meeting will take place Thursday, May 21, 2026 at 3:00 PM by Zoom.

Given the ongoing concerns involving the proposed transfer station project, JacMal Properties, LLC, and the Pocahontas County

Residents who are concerned about:

• future solid waste costs

• landfill property transactions

• transfer station development

• long-term financial obligations

• transparency and public involvement

may want to attend or monitor this meeting closely.

Meeting information from the published agenda:

 

Zoom Meeting:

https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86240889435...

Call In Number:

312-626-6799

Meeting ID:

862 4088 9435

Passcode:

678801

Public awareness and participation matter when decisions involving county property and taxpayer impacts are being discussed.

 

Watch our county Reps closely. 

Would someone record this and put it on Youtube for me?  This may be the "work around" I was told about by the rep of the GVEDC!

Summary of a Disaster

 

 

The following information outlines the roles of the entities involved in the ongoing Pocahontas County waste management transition, based on recent public records and reports. The SWA has publicly stated that they are starting over.

Key Entities & Their Roles

• Jacob Meck

  • Business Role: Owner of Allegheny Disposal and principal of JacMal Properties, LLC.

  • Current Project Role: He is the primary developer for the new transfer station intended to replace the current county landfill. Under a contract with the Pocahontas County Solid Waste Authority (SWA), his company (JacMal) is tasked with building the facility and leasing it to the SWA for a 15-year term. He has publicly positioned himself as a partner in solving the county’s upcoming waste disposal crisis, citing his experience in construction and waste hauling.

• JacMal Properties, LLC

  • Role: The legal entity owned by Jacob and Malinda Meck that holds the contract to build and lease the transfer station to the SWA.

  • Agreement Details: The SWA has entered into a 15-year lease agreement with JacMal. The contract involves fixed monthly payments by the SWA, with a final buyout option at the end of the term. This agreement has been a focal point of public debate, particularly regarding the lack of a competitive bidding process and the long-term financial impact on green box and tipping fees.

• Allegheny Disposal

  • Role: An established local garbage hauler operating in Pocahontas County.

  • Project Involvement: Allegheny Disposal was initially positioned as a key partner in the SWA's transition plan. While it was initially slated to handle the transportation of waste from the green boxes to the new transfer station, recent reports indicate that the SWA opted to put the "trucking" portion of the contract out for competitive bidding rather than awarding it directly to Allegheny Disposal.

• Greenbrier Economic Development Corporation (GEDC)

  • Role: A regional economic development entity that has been identified as a potential intermediary for property-related aspects of the project.

  • Project Involvement: As the SWA works to secure a site for the new transfer station, there have been discussions regarding the GEDC potentially holding title to the land or facilitating lease arrangements. This structure is often used in public-private partnerships to navigate the complexities of property ownership and site development for public facilities.

 

Summary of the Current Situation

The transition plan, involving the construction of a transfer station by JacMal and the potential involvement of the GEDC in site logistics, has been met with significant public scrutiny. Key points of contention raised by residents include:

• The Bidding Process: Concern over the direct awarding of the construction/lease contract to JacMal without an open bid process.

• Financial Impact: Potential increases in mandatory green box fees and tipping fees to cover the 15-year lease obligations.

• Monopolization of Waste: Regulations requiring all county-generated waste to pass through the new facility, which residents fear limits competition and raises costs.

This project remains an active subject of SWA and County Commission meetings, with significant public interest in the administrative and financial accountability of the transition.

Moment-By-Moment Account of the Meeting

 

 

The discussion in the provided meeting recording highlights significant public pushback against the Solid Waste Authority’s proposal to include green box fees as a line item on property tax tickets. The public concerns revolve around legality, financial burden, and the potential for increased tax dependency.

Core Legal and Fairness Concerns

• Legality of Tax Inclusion: Residents and speakers expressed strong concerns that adding a utility fee to tax bills is legally impermissible, citing concerns that it would incorrectly imply a tax lien on their property if unpaid [13:40], [24:45], [36:03].

• Confusing for Taxpayers: A major point of contention is that the inclusion would cause confusion for residents, particularly seniors, who might mistake the fee for a mandatory tax rather than a voluntary service fee [26:28], [36:43].

• Financial Impact: Many residents highlighted that Pocahontas County is a low-income area, making the proposed $4.12 million transfer station and its associated costs difficult to sustain for the average resident [22:46], [24:16], [52:16].

• Lack of Transparency: There is a pervasive sentiment that the proposal lacked open bidding and transparent cost analysis, with participants questioning the qualifications of the attorney leading the proposal [24:36], [01:02:49].

Commissioner's Position

During the meeting, the commissioners appeared to be aligned with the public's resistance, citing research and consultations with legal counsel suggesting they lacked the authority to add these fees to the tax bill [12:14], [14:02], [34:03]. They acknowledged the community's frustration regarding the collection of existing unpaid fees and the lack of an alternative plan for waste disposal [19:18], [55:32].

Suggested Alternatives

The community proposed several alternative methods for handling waste disposal and fee collection:

• Alternative Billing: Suggestions included moving to a quarterly or monthly billing cycle, which might be more manageable for residents on fixed incomes [29:05], [51:45].

• Site Management: Attendees suggested using stickers for access control, installing better security measures like cameras and fencing, and reconsidering open bidding for different disposal options instead of focusing solely on the transfer station [29:27], [42:25], [56:16].

For a more comprehensive look at these ongoing discussions, you can view the full meeting here: https://youtu.be/j9UXfxLrmYQ

Community Investigation Guide: Solid Waste Crisis

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 The history of the Pocahontas County Solid Waste Authority (PCSWA) is marked by the challenge of managing waste in a rural, low-density region while navigating the technical and financial requirements of state-mandated environmental standards.

The PCSWA was established in 1989, when it assumed control of the county’s solid waste management from the County Commission. Since then, it has operated the county's landfill, "Green Box" collection sites, and recycling programs.

Timeline of Significant Events (2000–2026)

While a comprehensive minute-by-minute ledger of every board action for the last 26 years is not publicly available, the following timeline highlights the critical milestones and administrative shifts:

Year	Key Event / Development
1989	Formation: The PCSWA is created by the state legislature, taking over management from the County Commission.
2000–2010	Operational Period: The SWA operates the landfill and Green Box sites under standard regulatory oversight.
2006	Regulation Update: The SWA adopts the "Mandatory Garbage Disposal Regulations," which remained the primary regulatory framework for nearly two decades.
2017	Expansion Attempt: The SWA attempts to purchase land for new landfill cells, but the project is abandoned following the passing of the landowner, and the SWA declines to use eminent domain.
2020	Capacity Warning: A state management plan report identifies that the landfill has approximately six years of projected lifespan remaining, signaling the need for an eventual transition to a transfer station model.
2023	Financial Crisis/Stakeholder Group: In response to mounting financial challenges, the SWA holds a public meeting to discuss their situation. A "Stakeholder’s Group" is formed with the West Virginia Solid Waste Management Board to research alternatives for when the landfill reaches capacity.
2025	Property Transfer: In March, the County Commission purchases the landfill property and places it in the SWA’s name, ensuring the Authority assumes responsibility for the long-term post-closure costs (estimated at $75,000/year for 30 years).
2026	Transition Planning: The SWA approves a 15-year lease agreement with a private entity (Jacob Meck) to build and operate a transfer station at the current landfill site. This sparks significant public debate regarding "flow control" mandates and the financial burden on residents.
2026	Leadership Change & Regulatory Overhaul: Chairman Ed Riley resigns amid public controversy in March. In May, the Board updates its Mandatory Solid Waste Regulations to include stricter "flow control" and new hardship exemptions for green box fees.

Board Structure & Membership

It is important to clarify that there is no publicly accessible, centralized registry of every individual who has served on the PCSWA board since 2000. These positions are often rotating and appointed by various agencies rather than elected by the general public.

The Board is composed of five members:

• County Commission Appointees: 2 members.

• State/Agency Appointees: The remaining 3 members are appointed by the WV Department of Environmental Protection, the local Soil Conservation District, and the West Virginia Public Service Commission.

Noted Recent Board Participants (2020–2026):

• Ed Riley: Former Chairman (resigned March 2026).

• David Henderson: Chairman.

• David McLaughlin: Board member involved in recent discussions regarding transfer station contracts and public engagement.

The Current Context (2026)

The primary struggle for the current Board has been balancing the financial realities of low population density and limited waste tonnage with the high costs of closure and new infrastructure. The board’s recent focus—specifically the 2026 push for "flow control" and the transfer station lease—is aimed at securing a stable revenue stream to manage the substantial debt and post-closure liabilities associated with the landfill.

If you are looking to review specific historical actions or voting records for a particular year, you may need to file a formal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the Pocahontas County Solid Waste Authority office directly, as their internal minute books would be the only complete repository of these records.

Follow-up: Would you like assistance drafting a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) letter to the SWA to request specific meeting minutes or board rosters for a particular time period?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

To effectively navigate the request process in West Virginia, you should file a formal written request. The West Virginia Freedom of Information Act (W. Va. Code § 29B-1-1 et seq.) requires public bodies to respond within five business days (excluding weekends and legal holidays).

Below is a template you can adapt. Since you are investigating historical trends and specific administrative actions, I have included placeholders for the specific date ranges and types of records.

FOIA Request Template

[Your Name]

[Your Address]

[Your Phone Number]

[Your Email Address]

[Date]

Custodian of Records

Pocahontas County Solid Waste Authority

[SWA Office Address, if known]

[City, State, Zip]

RE: Freedom of Information Act Request

Dear Custodian of Records,

Pursuant to the West Virginia Freedom of Information Act (W. Va. Code § 29B-1-1 et seq.), I am writing to request access to and/or copies of the following public records maintained by the Pocahontas County Solid Waste Authority:

1. Meeting Minutes: All official minutes of the Pocahontas County Solid Waste Authority board meetings for the period of [Insert Start Date, e.g., January 1, 2000] through [Insert End Date, e.g., May 21, 2026].

2. Board Rosters: A record or list of individuals who have served as board members for the Pocahontas County Solid Waste Authority from [Insert Start Date] to [Insert End Date], including their terms of service and the appointing agency for each member.

3. Voting Records: [Optional: Specify if you need records of specific votes, such as "records of all votes taken regarding landfill site selection or contractual agreements with private vendors."]

I request that these documents be provided in electronic format, if available, to reduce reproduction costs. If records exist only in physical format, please notify me of the estimated cost of reproduction before proceeding, as provided under W. Va. Code § 29B-1-3(e).

Please note that per West Virginia law, the Authority may not charge a fee for the time spent searching for or retrieving these records; fees are limited to the actual cost of reproduction.

As a [journalist/researcher/concerned citizen], I am requesting this information to contribute to the public’s understanding of local governance and the historical management of solid waste infrastructure in Pocahontas County. If you deny any portion of this request, please provide the specific legal exemption or justification for each denial in writing, as required by state law.

I look forward to your response within five business days. Thank you for your time and assistance in ensuring government transparency.

Sincerely,

[Your Signature]

[Your Printed Name]

Submission Tips

• Method: Send this via email if the SWA has a public email address, or via certified mail if you want a receipt of delivery.

• "Reasonable Specificity": Because you are asking for a 26-year span, the Authority might claim "overly broad" if they lack organized archives. If they push back, you might consider narrowing the request to specific "high-interest" years first (e.g., years surrounding major transitions like 2006, 2020, and 2023) to build a "proof of concept" for your broader research.

• Record Everything: Keep a copy of the sent letter and note the date it was received. If you do not hear back within five business days, you have grounds to follow up or inquire about the status.

Would you like me to refine the "records requested" section to better target specific board actions or transition periods you are most interested in?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To refine your FOIA request, it is best to move from a "broad" request to a "surgical" one. A 26-year blanket request is often seen as "overly burdensome" by public bodies and can lead to administrative delays or outright denials.

Focusing on the specific inflection points where policy shifted or significant contracts were signed will yield much more actionable intelligence.

Targeted Time Periods for Requests

To get the most "high-value" documentation, consider clustering your request around these three critical eras:

• 2005–2007: The Regulatory Foundation

  • Why: This period likely contains the foundational debates and legal analysis regarding the implementation of the Mandatory Garbage Disposal Regulations.

  • Target: Look for discussions on the "Green Box" system setup and the initial legal arguments for mandatory participation.

• 2016–2018: The Expansion Attempt

  • Why: This era covers the attempt to purchase land for new landfill cells.

  • Target: Request minutes and correspondence related to "land acquisition," "eminent domain," and "landowner negotiations." This will reveal the board’s decision-making process when faced with expansion limits.

• 2022–2026: The Transition & Privatization

  • Why: This is the current, active crisis period involving landfill closure and the transfer station lease.

  • Target: Focus on "contracts," "private vendor agreements," and "WV Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) correspondence."

Refined "Records Requested" Section

You can replace the generic bullet points in the previous template with this more granular version to ensure you get specific, high-value evidence:

RECORDS REQUESTED:

1. Contractual & Financial Agreements: Copies of all signed contracts, leases, and service agreements between the Pocahontas County Solid Waste Authority and private vendors or waste-hauling companies, specifically those executed between January 1, 2023, and the date of this letter.

2. Infrastructure Planning Minutes: Official minutes (and any attached exhibits or reports) for all board meetings between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018, specifically regarding land acquisition, landfill expansion, or site development.

3. Regulatory Adoption Records: Minutes, staff memos, and public hearing records related to the development and adoption of the original "Mandatory Garbage Disposal Regulations" (circa 2005–2006).

4. State Correspondence: All correspondence, including emails and letters, between the Authority and the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) or the Public Service Commission (PSC) concerning the landfill’s projected lifespan and the transition to a transfer station model, dated from January 1, 2020, to present.

5. Board Composition: A roster of all board members who served during the identified periods (2005–2007, 2016–2018, and 2022–2026), including their respective dates of appointment and the appointing entity.

Strategic Advice for the "Executive Session" Trap

Public bodies often discuss sensitive items in "Executive Session" and may claim these are exempt from disclosure.

• The Counter: Even in Executive Sessions, the law typically requires the action taken or the vote resulting from the session to be recorded in the public minutes.

• The Tactic: In your request, add a clause: "I acknowledge that certain records may be exempt from disclosure; however, I request a privilege log for any records withheld, identifying the document, the date, and the specific legal exemption being invoked for each redaction or withholding."

   

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  My search of public records regarding the "Slavens property" in Green Bank, West Virginia, did not yield specific online documentation of its transfer or purchase history. Local property transactions often do not appear in general public indexes unless they have been the subject of significant public reporting, litigation, or recent news coverage.

  Given your background in investigative research and local administrative oversight, you are likely in the best position to access the primary documents required to trace this property's history. To assist your investigation, here is a structured approach to locating these records through official Pocahontas County channels.

  Recommended Investigative Steps

  1. Trace the Deed History (County Clerk’s Office)

  The most definitive way to determine the ownership history and any transfer of the Slavens property is through the Pocahontas County Clerk’s Office.

  • Deed Indexing: Request a search of the "Grantor/Grantee" index for the name "Slavens" in Green Bank. Look for transfers involving the County Commission, Solid Waste Authority, or other public entities.

  • Tax Maps: The Assessor’s office can provide a map location for the property. Once you have the map and parcel ID, the Clerk’s office can pull the complete chain of title to see if and when the property was conveyed to a public or private entity.

  2. Review Commission & Authority Minutes

  If the property was transferred by or to a public entity (like the County Commission or the Solid Waste Authority), the decision to buy, sell, or lease the land must be reflected in their official meeting minutes.

  • Action Items: Search minutes for keywords such as "Green Bank," "property acquisition," "landfill," "surplus property," or "transfer station."

  • Executive Sessions: If the purchase was negotiated privately, check the minutes for the date the motion to enter executive session was made and when the final vote was taken. Even if the discussion happened behind closed doors, the final vote should be recorded in the public session.

  3. Targeted Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Requests

  Since public records might not be fully indexed or digitized, a targeted FOIA request is often necessary to secure the full "paper trail" of any purchase attempts. Based on your previous research into the SWA landfill transition, you may consider a request structured as follows:

  Request: "All records, including correspondence, appraisals, purchase agreements, options, or letters of intent, regarding the property formerly known as the Slavens property (or associated with the Slavens family) in Green Bank, WV, specifically in relation to any transfer to or purchase by the Pocahontas County Commission or the Pocahontas County Solid Waste Authority."

  Key Information to Verify

  When you are able to access these records, ensure you look for:

  • Appraisal Reports: These are often public record once a transaction is completed and provide a baseline for the property's valuation at the time of the transfer.

  • Restrictive Covenants: Check if any deeds included conditions regarding the future use of the land (e.g., industrial vs. residential zoning requirements).

  • "Attempted" Purchases: If a transaction did not go through, you may find "Letters of Intent" or rejected bids in the administrative files that would not show up in the formal deed records.

  Would you like assistance drafting a formal FOIA request letter for the Pocahontas County Clerk or the County Commission to initiate this investigation?

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  To initiate a formal investigation into the Slavens property in Green Bank, the following draft is structured to comply with the West Virginia Freedom of Information Act (W. Va. Code § 29B-1-1 et seq.). You can adapt this template to send to the Pocahontas County Clerk or the Pocahontas County Commission as needed.

  FOIA Request Template

  Date: [Insert Date]

  To:

  [Name of Official/Department Head]

  [Office Name, e.g., Pocahontas County Clerk / Pocahontas County Commission]

  [Address]

  [City, State, Zip]

  Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request regarding the "Slavens Property" in Green Bank, West Virginia

  Dear [Name of Official],

  Pursuant to the West Virginia Freedom of Information Act, W. Va. Code § 29B-1-1 et seq., I am requesting access to all public records pertaining to the parcel of real property located in Green Bank, West Virginia, historically known as the "Slavens property."

  I am requesting copies of any and all documents, correspondence, and records related to this property from [Insert Start Date, e.g., January 1, 2015] to the present. Specifically, this request includes, but is not limited to:

  • Deeds and Titles: Copies of any deeds, land transfer records, or title search documents showing ownership history, including transfers to or from the Pocahontas County Commission, the Pocahontas County Solid Waste Authority, or any private entity.

  • Agreements: Any purchase agreements, letters of intent, options to purchase, lease agreements, or memorandums of understanding regarding the property.

  • Appraisals and Assessments: Any property appraisals, environmental assessments, or valuations conducted on the property for the purpose of potential acquisition or sale.

  • Correspondence: Any emails, memos, letters, or minutes from meetings (executive or public) involving the Pocahontas County Commission or the Solid Waste Authority that discuss the purchase, sale, or potential development of this property.

  If any portion of this request requires a fee for reproduction, please notify me in advance of the estimated cost. If you believe any of the requested records are exempt from disclosure, please provide a written explanation citing the specific legal exemption for each redacted or withheld document.

  I would prefer to receive these records in digital format (PDF or electronic files) to reduce costs and processing time. If electronic delivery is not possible, please notify me so we can arrange for inspection or mail.

  Thank you for your timely assistance with this matter. I look forward to your response within the statutory time frame mandated by West Virginia law.

  Sincerely,

  [Your Name]

  [Your Address]

  [Your Phone Number]

  [Your Email Address]

  Tips for Submission

  • Be Specific: If you have a Tax Map and Parcel number, include it in the first paragraph. This eliminates ambiguity and prevents the clerk from claiming they could not identify the parcel.

  • Delivery Method: Send this via Certified Mail with Return Receipt Requested. This ensures you have legal proof of when the agency received your request, which is vital if you need to enforce the statutory response deadlines later.

  • Record Retention: Keep a copy of your signed request and the delivery receipt in your research file for the Salt Shaker Press.

  • Follow-up: If you do not receive a response within five working days (the standard statutory period under W. Va. Code § 29B-1-3), follow up with a polite but firm inquiry referencing the date of delivery.

   

This is a community service of the Salt Shaker Press