Vote Until You Get it Right

 Public governments, like the Pocahontas County Solid Waste Authority (SWA), are generally required to conduct their business in open public meetings. However, they are permitted to enter into a closed "executive session" under specific statutory exceptions. The rationale for using these closed sessions is to protect sensitive information where premature public disclosure could harm the government's negotiating position, violate employee privacy, or compromise physical security.

A review of the Pocahontas County SWA meeting minutes reveals several records of executive sessions, explicitly justified by the following statutory exceptions:

1. Property Lease or Purchase (Exception #9) The most frequent use of executive session by the SWA was to discuss the lease or purchase of real estate, specifically regarding the landfill property. Publicly discussing the maximum amount the authority is willing to pay could ruin their bargaining power with private sellers.

• October 26, 2022: The board went into executive session under Exception #9 to discuss the lease or purchase of property.
• June 3, 2022 & June 13, 2022: The board utilized Exception #9 to discuss the lease or purchase of property, immediately after which they voted in open session to authorize their attorney to negotiate a purchase price for the landfill land.
• January 12, 2023 & January 18, 2023: The board again went into executive session under Exception #9 to discuss property negotiations.

2. Commercial Competition and Private Partnerships (Exception #9) Executive sessions are also used to protect the SWA's position when dealing with commercial competition or negotiating complex public-private contracts.

• December 17, 2025: The SWA went into executive session under Exception #9 "to discuss a matter involving commercial competition". This specific meeting was highly controversial because the SWA allowed private contractors Jacob and Malinda Meck of Allegheny Disposal to attend the closed session, while explicitly excluding public officials such as the County Commission President and the Marlinton Mayor. Following this closed session, the SWA returned to the open meeting and officially formed a negotiating group to work on the public-private partnership for the new transfer station.

3. Security Devices (Exception #8) Governments use executive sessions to discuss security measures so that the public (and potential criminals) do not know the exact details, blind spots, or capabilities of the security systems.

• September 25, 2024: The SWA entered executive session under Exception #8 "to develop Security Devices," specifically regarding the installation of surveillance systems for the Green Box sites.

4. Personnel Matters (Exception #2A) To protect the privacy of individual employees, discussions regarding hiring, firing, or disciplinary actions are typically held behind closed doors.

• October 26, 2022: In addition to property matters, the board cited Exception #2A during this meeting specifically to discuss personnel.

5. Contract Proposals and Legal Matters The board also uses executive sessions to consult with its attorney on legal matters and to evaluate private business proposals before making public decisions.

• June 24, 2015: The board went into executive session to discuss the specifics of a recycling proposal submitted by Pocahontas Recycling.
• December 3, 2025: The meeting agenda scheduled an executive session explicitly for a "Legal Matter to be Discussed with SWA’s Attorney".

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 The 2-2 tie vote occurred during a highly tense special meeting on February 18, 2026, as the Solid Waste Authority (SWA) board debated "Option 4," a $4.1 million, 15-year lease-to-own transfer station agreement with Jacob Meck's company, JacMal, LLC. Because one board member had recently resigned, only four members were present, setting the stage for a deadlock.

Here is exactly how the split decision unfolded:

• The Proponents (2 Votes in Favor): Chairman Dave Henderson and Vice-Chairman David McLaughlin strongly advocated for the contract. They argued that the county was out of time; given the lengthy permitting and construction process, they insisted the SWA had no other viable path to avoid a total cessation of trash services when the landfill closed.
• The Dissenting Vote (1 Vote Against): Board member Phillip Cobb voted explicitly against the motion. He stated he could not support a project that would cost over $4 million and expressed grave concern that the required massive increase in "Green Box" fees—projected to jump to $310 for the first year—would severely hurt local residents. Cobb also criticized the SWA for failing to explore other options a year earlier, arguing their current desperation was self-inflicted.
• The Abstention (1 Abstention): Board member Ed Riley chose to abstain from voting, stating that he simply did not have enough information on the newly presented proposal to make a decision. Riley also voiced serious concerns about the SWA's ability to collect the high fees from citizens, questioning what would happen if the SWA defaulted on the lease because residents could not afford to pay on time.

The Ethics Commission Intervention Following the initial count of 2 in favor, 1 against, and 1 abstention, SWA Office Administrator Mary Clendenen called John Roush at the West Virginia State Ethics Commission to determine if the motion had legally passed. Roush clarified that because only four members were present, an abstention essentially functioned as a vote against the motion. This ruling officially recorded the outcome as a 2-2 tie, meaning it failed to achieve the necessary majority approval.

Desperate to push the contract through, David McLaughlin made a second motion to approve Option 4 later in that exact same meeting. However, the second vote yielded the identical 2-2 rejection, with Cobb again voting "no" and Riley abstaining.

This administrative paralysis halted the transfer station project for exactly one week. At the next regular meeting on February 25, the proponents used the threat of a disastrous "stop-gap" waste crisis to pressure the dissenters, ultimately securing a unanimous 4-0 approval.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 The de facto officer doctrine is a pragmatic legal fiction designed to protect the public and third parties by validating the official acts of individuals acting under "color of authority," even if they have technical defects in their qualification, such as an unfiled or expired oath of office. However, the doctrine has several strict legal limitations:

• It Does Not Defend Against Direct Attacks: The doctrine's primary purpose is to prevent "collateral attacks"—such as a criminal defendant attempting to overturn a conviction by arguing the judge filed their oath late. However, it cannot be used to defend against a "direct" challenge to the official's title, such as a writ of quo warranto, which is a specific legal action intended to oust an unqualified individual from office.
• It is a Retrospective Shield, Not a Prospective Right: The doctrine only validates past actions to maintain the stability of government. It does not authorize a governing body to prospectively ignore the oath requirement. If a challenge is raised at the time of a public meeting, or if the body is aware that a member is unsworn, it must follow statutory mandates and legally bar that individual from participating in official acts or voting. 
• It Does Not Protect "Usurpers" or Bad Faith Actors: The law draws a sharp line between a de facto officer (who acts under a "show of right" but has a technical defect) and a "usurper" (who takes possession of an office without any color of right or title). The acts of a usurper are generally void and cannot be saved by the doctrine. Furthermore, the doctrine often requires "good faith"; if an individual knowingly bypasses the oath requirement to cast a specific, controversial vote, a court may classify them as a usurper rather than a de facto officer, potentially nullifying their vote.
• No Personal or Financial Protection for the Official: While the doctrine protects the public's reliance on a board's decisions, it offers no personal protection to the non-compliant official. An unsworn official cannot use the de facto doctrine to claim a right to a salary or to defend themselves in a suit brought to challenge their specific legal status. Because they lack legal authorization, these officials may face lawsuits to claw back any public compensation they received, lose their "qualified immunity" (exposing them to personal civil liability for ultra vires acts), and even face criminal misdemeanor charges for impersonating a public official.

Our Complaint 

Note: It was announced early at the meeting that Henderson had not taken an oath of office for the last 9 years.  On March 31, 2026 he file an oath of office as an appointed SWA member. 

He continued to vote on motions subsequent to that announcement. 

The meeting should have been adjourned at that announcement and he should taken his oath of office. Instead the 3 members of the 5 member board continued to affirmatively vote for burdensome motions upon the people of Pocahontas County.

1964: Surprising Snapshots of a Revolution

 

 

1964: The Year Louis Armstrong Beat the Beatles and Other Surprising Snapshots of a Revolution

1. Introduction: The Year the World Changed

To the casual observer, the Sixties are often painted in the psychedelic neon of 1967 or the political fire of 1968. Yet, 1964 was the true hinge of the decade—the precise moment where the buttoned-down, post-war aesthetic of the Fifties finally buckled under the weight of a radical, modern future. It was a year of staggering cultural intersections: a twelve-month span where the "New York World’s Fair" promised a space-age tomorrow while the "Bakersfield Sound" kept one foot in the dusty past. From the roar of the first Ford Mustang to the messy birth of the Buffalo wing, 1964 wasn’t just a year; it was a bridge. Did you realize that so many of our modern staples—the very things that define American "cool"—can be traced back to this single, transformative revolution?

2. The 62-Year-Old Who Toppled the "Mop Tops"

History usually remembers 1964 as the year of the British Invasion, but the charts tell a more nuanced story of a sonic collision. In May, a stunning upset occurred that defied the trajectory of the youth movement. Louis "Satchmo" Armstrong, then 62 years old, reached the #1 spot with "Hello, Dolly!", effectively ending the Beatles’ three-month stranglehold on the top position. It was a moment of profound cultural friction: the gravelly, analog warmth of Satchmo’s trumpet and his traditional jazz phrasing stood in stubborn defiance of the high-pitched, electric screams of Beatlemania. By becoming the oldest person to ever hold a #1 song at that time, Armstrong proved that the "old guard" wasn't going quietly into the night, even as the world began to vibrate to a new, distorted frequency.

3. The 40% Club: When TV Truly United a Nation

In February 1964, the United States gathered around a "national campfire" in a way that is fundamentally extinct in our era of fragmented streaming and TikTok algorithms. When The Beatles stepped onto the stage of The Ed Sullivan Show, 73 million people—nearly 40% of the entire country—tuned in simultaneously. This wasn't just a television broadcast; it was a collective psychological event. In a year that would be marked by the profound tensions of the Civil Rights movement, this singular broadcast offered a rare moment of unified focus, even if the nation was split on the merit of the music itself. As we look back from a world of infinite choices, one has to wonder about the power of that shared experience:

"Do you remember where you were when the 'Mop Tops' first landed in America? Did you love them, or did you think they needed a haircut?"

4. The Birth of the Modern Consumer: Mustangs, Charms, and Action Figures

The marketplace of 1964 signaled a shift toward a new kind of American consumerism—one focused on style, speed, and the commodification of "cool":

• The Ford Mustang: Making its grand debut at the World’s Fair, the Mustang was a sleek, accessible dream for the middle class. At a starting price of just $2,368, it became an instant icon of the open road.
• Lucky Charms: This marshmallow-filled cereal hit grocery shelves for the first time, forever changing the landscape of the American breakfast table with its "magically delicious" appeal.
• G.I. Joe: 1964 saw the launch of the quintessential "action figure." By branding a doll for boys with military grit, Hasbro redefined the gendered boundaries of play for generations to come.

5. Grit and Glory: When Underdogs Redefined Sports

The sports world of 1964 mirrored the year’s broader theme of the old guard falling to the new. On the golf course, the legendary "Arnie’s Army" cheered as Arnold Palmer secured his fourth Masters title, representing the peak of a traditional sporting era. However, elsewhere, the status quo was shattering.

At the Tokyo Summer Olympics—the first ever held in Asia—heavyweight Joe Frazier won the Gold Medal despite the excruciating handicap of a broken thumb. On the baseball diamond, the St. Louis Cardinals toppled the New York Yankees in a thrilling seven-game World Series. This was more than a loss for New York; it was the definitive end of the "Yankee Dynasty," an era of dominance so absolute that the team would not return to the Series for another 12 years. Meanwhile, in February, a young Cassius Clay shocked the world by defeating Sonny Liston for the heavyweight title. It was the arrival of a revolution in motion; only days later, Clay would announce his name change to Muhammad Ali, signaling that the sports world—and the man himself—would never be the same.

6. A Culinary Accident and a Logistical Revolution

Two of the most enduring legacies of 1964 emerged from a strange mix of serendipity and bureaucracy. In Buffalo, New York, the Buffalo Wing was reportedly born from a kitchen accident at the Anchor Bar, signaling the rise of "leisure food" in the American diet. While the wing represented a shift in how we ate, the common adoption of the ZIP Code represented the standardization of a rapidly expanding nation. As Americans moved to the suburbs and the volume of mail exploded, the ZIP Code provided the logistical framework necessary for a modern, interconnected society. One changed the palate; the other revolutionized the post—both were essential to the "modernizing" of the American experience.

7. Voices of the Spirit: The Sound of Hope

Beyond the rock-and-roll headlines, the music of 1964 provided the emotional and spiritual backbone for a nation in the throes of social upheaval. Mahalia Jackson, a cornerstone of the Civil Rights movement, used her immense voice to shake the rafters with songs of hope like "How I Got Over." This soulful revolution was mirrored in the pop charts by the "Motown" sound, as The Temptations secured their first #1 hit with "My Girl," bringing a sophisticated, choreographed elegance to the airwaves. This era also saw the transition of traditional spiritual imagery into the popular consciousness; The Impressions’ "People Get Ready" utilized the metaphor of the gospel train to deliver a message of social change that resonated far beyond the church pews.

8. The Price of Living: 1964 by the Numbers

The "Price is Right" of 1964 reveals an economic landscape that seems almost alien today. To put it in perspective, consider that a brand-new, iconic sports car cost the equivalent of roughly 2,500 loaves of bread—a ratio of luxury to staple that has widened significantly in the intervening decades:

• A gallon of milk: $0.95
• A loaf of bread: $0.21
• A new Ford Mustang: $2,368

9. Conclusion: A Legacy That Lingers

The influence of 1964 refuses to fade. We see it in the "Bakersfield Sound" of Buck Owens and the wit of Roger Miller, the "Clown Prince of Country Music," whose hits like "Dang Me" kept the nation smiling. We feel it in the enduring anthems of the Civil Rights era and the legendary status of "Arnie’s Army" in the annals of golf history. 1964 was the moment the traditional and the modern shared the same stage, creating a vibrant, often messy, but always fascinating cultural tapestry.

If you could step back into that pivotal year, where would your loyalties lie? Would you head straight for the sleek innovation of the Ford Mustang booth at the World’s Fair, or would you brave the crowds and wait in line to witness the electric dawn of the Beatles?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Analysis of the 1964 Audiovisual Program: A Retrospective Briefing

Executive Summary

The "A Trip Back to 1964" program is a structured audiovisual initiative designed for residents in nursing homes and assisted living facilities. Its primary objective is to foster cognitive engagement and social interaction through nostalgia, leveraging the music, sports, and cultural milestones of 1964.

The year 1964 is framed as a pivotal era characterized by the "British Invasion," the rise of the Motown sound, significant shifts in professional sports dynasties, and the introduction of enduring commercial products. Key highlights of the program include the record-breaking television appearance of The Beatles, the peak of the Civil Rights-era Gospel music, and the debut of cultural staples like the Ford Mustang and Lucky Charms cereal.

Musical Landscape and Cultural Influence

The program categorizes the music of 1964 into three distinct segments, each representing a specific cultural movement or demographic appeal.

Pop and the "British Invasion"

• The Beatles: The group’s appearance on The Ed Sullivan Show in February 1964 remains a landmark event. Approximately 73 million people—nearly 40% of the U.S. population at the time—viewed the performance.
• Motown Sound: The Temptations achieved their first #1 hit with "My Girl," a song noted for its smooth choreography and quintessential Motown production.
• Louis Armstrong: At age 62, Armstrong became the oldest person at that time to secure a #1 song with "Hello, Dolly!", famously displacing The Beatles from the top spot.

The Nashville and Bakersfield Sound

• Roger Miller: Known as the "Clown Prince of Country Music," Miller’s hit "Dang Me" highlighted the more humorous, lighthearted side of the genre.
• Buck Owens: The song "I've Got a Tiger By the Tail" represented the peak of the "Bakersfield Sound." Owens is also identified through his later association with the television show Hee Haw.

Gospel and Civil Rights

• Mahalia Jackson: Jackson is identified as a cornerstone of the Civil Rights movement; her performance of "How I Got Over" is used to highlight the power and hope inherent in the era's spirituals.
• The Impressions: The song "People Get Ready" utilized train imagery, a common motif in traditional spirituals, to convey its message.

Sports Milestones and National Headlines

The year 1964 saw significant shifts in the sports world, from the emergence of new icons to the decline of long-standing dynasties.

• 1964 Tokyo Summer Olympics: This was the first time the Olympic Games were hosted in Asia. A notable highlight was Joe "Smokin' Joe" Frazier winning the heavyweight boxing Gold Medal despite competing with a broken thumb.
• Professional Baseball: The St. Louis Cardinals defeated the New York Yankees in a 7-game World Series. This event marked the conclusion of the "Yankee Dynasty," as the team would not return to the World Series for another 12 years.
• Professional Golf: Arnold Palmer secured his fourth Masters title, supported by his dedicated fan base known as "Arnie's Army."
• Boxing Headlines: Cassius Clay (later Muhammad Ali) defeated Sonny Liston to claim the Heavyweight Championship.

Cultural and Commercial Innovations

The program highlights several introductions in 1964 that became permanent fixtures of American life:

Innovation	Significance / Cost
Ford Mustang	Debuted at the World’s Fair for approximately $2,368.
ZIP Codes	Entered common usage across the United States.
G.I. Joe	The iconic action figure was launched.
Lucky Charms	The cereal first appeared on grocery store shelves.
Buffalo Wings	Invented at the Anchor Bar in Buffalo, NY.

Economic Trivia: "The Price is Right"

To facilitate interactive engagement, the program provides 1964 pricing data for common household staples:

• Gallon of Milk: $0.95
• Loaf of Bread: $0.21

Program Implementation and Methodology

The program is designed as a 60-minute interactive session, prioritizing resident participation over passive viewing.

Hosting Strategies

• Validation: Moderators are instructed to repeat resident memories back to the group to ensure clarity and inclusion.
• Customization: The program encourages local research into 1964 weather events (e.g., blizzards or heatwaves), local landmarks, and high school or college sports to make the session personal to the specific community.
• Active Discussion: Each segment includes prompts to trigger specific memories, such as first dances, Sunday morning routines, or family trips to "mini-golf."

Suggested Schedule

Timeframe (Minutes)	Activity
00–05	Introduction & Theme Song
05–15	Pop & Motown Discussion
15–25	Country & Gospel Discussion
25–40	Sports, News, and Local Trivia
40–50	"Price is Right" Game & Memorabilia Show-and-Tell
50–60	Movie Clips & Cool Down

 create graphics for this program

I'm being asked for a lot of images right now, so I can't create that for you. Can you ask again later?

 

 

Ghosts on the Mountain

 

Cities in the Clouds: The Rise and Fall of the Alleghenies’ Highest and Coldest Ghost Towns

Today, a profound and heavy silence defines the high plateaus of Pocahontas County. The wind whistles through stands of secondary-growth forest, a lonely soundtrack for a landscape that has largely reclaimed its privacy from the industrial age. Yet, in 1903, this wilderness vibrated with a different energy. The industrial roar of steam whistles and the rhythmic thud of the axe shattered a quiet that had endured for millennia. The completion of the Coal and Iron Railway—a 47-mile "stupendous engineering feat" involving giant cuts, deep tunnels, and complex bridgework—transformed these remote ridges into an epicenter of global resource extraction.

The resulting settlements were not traditional villages meant to endure for centuries, but highly engineered, temporary "societies in the clouds." Situated at the rugged headwaters of the Cheat, Greenbrier, Elk, and Gauley Rivers, these towns were born from a landscape shaped by successive intervals of upheavals and subsidences. The geological character of the region, defined by its anticlinals and synclinals, had been sculpted by floods and frosts into a high-altitude plateau that held one of the last great virgin forests in the Eastern United States. These towns were the machinery of progress, situated in environments of extreme climatic severity.

To the narrative historian, these locations are not failures; they are the physical remains of a specific social contract between industrial capital and the mountain geography. They were "ghost towns" by design—planned communities built to flourish with the boom and vanish when the "noble trees" were spent. They represented a moment where human engineering triumphed over isolation, creating pockets of high-functioning modernity in a roadless, windswept wilderness.

1. The Highest, Coldest, and Most Isolated Modernity

The town of Spruce remains the most haunting archetype of these mountain societies. Established in 1902 along the Shavers Fork of the Cheat River, Spruce sat at an elevation ranging from 3,853 to 3,868 feet. It was marketed to the world as the "highest and coldest town east of the Mississippi," a title justified by its harrowing climate and lonely perch. The town was a paradox: it possessed no roads to the outside world, relying entirely on "Y"-shaped railroad tracks, yet it offered luxuries that would have been the envy of many lowland cities.

In the heart of this roadless enclave sat the Spruce Hotel, a thirty-room sanctuary of industrial success featuring electric lights, hot running water, and steam heat. While the surrounding forest was a tangled web of spruce and hemlock, the town’s "Main Street" was a wide, elevated boardwalk, keeping residents above the damp, rocky soil. It was an island of 20th-century comfort floating in an ocean of wilderness.

"The fact that no roads ever led to the town adds to its 'eerie' and 'chilling' reputation... residents reportedly observed frosts even during the midsummer months."

This existence was a visceral triumph of technology over a hostile environment. Workers and their families lived in a dual settlement—the original logging site and a massive pulp mill community downriver—where the smell of fresh-cut wood and the soot of locomotives were the constants of life. It was a high-altitude machine, processing the forest into pulpwood destined for the great paper mills of Virginia and Maryland.

2. The Mathematical Brutality of the Timber Boom

The abandonment of these towns was a "planned consequence," the inevitable result of a resource extraction so intense it can only be described as mathematically brutal. Settlements like May and Wildell were established with a countdown already in place. Wildell, founded in 1904, once boasted 300 residents, a church, and a schoolhouse. But its life was measured in board feet. By 1915, the mill had processed 110 million board feet of lumber, and as the last of the timber was hauled away, the town simply ceased to be.

The town of May, located at the confluence of Mill Run and the West Fork, offers an even sharper look at this ephemeral industry. Founded in 1904, it was completely gone by 1914. During that single decade, the mill cut 100 million board feet of spruce and hemlock. The sheer speed of this extraction is staggering when broken down:

• Total Output: 100,000,000 board feet
• Operational Span: 10 years (approx. 3,000 working days)
• Extraction Rate: ~33,333 board feet per day

Once the rail incline systems had exhausted the surrounding ridges, the economic engine was dismantled. The tracks were pulled, the machinery was moved, and the "vibrant and bustling mill towns" were left to the slow reclamation of the elements. The "noble trees" were gone, and the societies built to harvest them vanished as quickly as they had arrived.

3. Life on the "Corks": The World of the Woodhicks

The social life of these towns was a rugged Appalachian drama. The primary actors were the "woodhicks"—hardened woodsmen recognizable by their "corks," the spiked work boots that allowed them to keep their footing on frozen logs and slippery mountain slopes. For $1.75 to $2.00 a day, these men performed the dangerous labor of the camps, living in company-run bunkhouses that followed the receding treeline deeper into the mountains.

Before the "stupendous engineering" of the railway, the land belonged to Scotch-Irish pioneers who lived a "simple life" of subsistence and oral tradition. Families like the Adkissons and the Holmeses had settled the high meadows of Spruce Flats and the headwaters of the Swago long before the industrial surge. This earlier era was one where history was carried by "older venerated persons" who remembered every birth, death, and incident of the wilderness.

The folklore of the region often humanized the cold statistics of the timber boom. Regional records tell of a "panther" that once attacked a group of boys near the spruce bank opposite Hugh Dever’s home, and of times when the air was so thick with smoke from the mills and dry weather that residents were warned to "lock smokehouses and granaries" against desperate scavengers. These stories provide the human heartbeat within the industrial machine.

4. The Digital Resurrection: Norman Alderman’s Archive

In the 21st century, these vanished societies have been granted a digital second life. Norman Alderman, a local resident and dedicated archivist, has led a movement to democratize the history of Pocahontas County. By digitizing and uploading the seminal 653-page "History of Pocahontas County," Alderman has freed primary records that were once trapped in rare, fragile volumes, making them accessible to a global audience.

This work is more than a hobby; it is a form of cultural archaeology. Alderman’s digital library of maps and family genealogies allows the "older venerated persons" to speak once more. It provides the necessary context to understand how these pioneers and industrial laborers "worked out a vast problem in the wilderness"—the problem of survival, engineering, and community-building in one of the most isolated and geologically challenging regions of the continent. Through digitization, the "ghosts" of the mountains are finally being heard by the world.

5. Nature’s Patient Reclamation

Today, the landscape of Pocahontas County is often "unrecognizable" to those who only know its industrial history. The earth moved for locomotive interchanges has been smoothed by time, and the original "noble trees"—the massive virgin spruce—have been replaced by a dense secondary growth. The transition from a "culture of extraction" to one of "preservation and education" is nearly complete.

The ghosts are now the subjects of study and tourism. The ruins of the Spruce pulp mill and the foundations of company houses serve as landmarks for projects like "Your Forest History," which has placed interpretive signs along the 22-mile West Fork Trail.

• The Cass Scenic Railroad: Now carries passengers to the high plateau, offering a window into the era of steam and spruce.
• The Cheat Mountain Salamander: Provides a "chilling" and evocative view of the abandoned remains of Spruce.
• Ecological Return: While the virgin stands are gone, the forest has returned with a resilience that mirrors the people who once worked here.

These efforts give "tongues in trees" to the silent ruins, ensuring that the labor and lives of the thousands who built these "cities in the clouds" are not forgotten.

Conclusion: Tongues in Trees

The ghost towns of the Alleghenies represent a unique chapter in the American story—a moment when the highest, coldest reaches of the mountains were the epicenter of a global industrial appetite. These were not failed settlements; they were successful, temporary societies that fulfilled their purpose with staggering efficiency. Their legacy is a testament to the cycles of human endeavor and the relentless reclamation of nature.

As we look upon the digitized records preserved by Norman Alderman, we are forced to reflect on our own era. Like the "cities in the clouds" of 1903, our current modern societies are built upon complex social and industrial contracts. We must ask ourselves: what "temporary societies" are we building today? Will our digital footprints be as evocative and "eerie" as the ruins of Spruce a century from now? Perhaps, like the "noble trees" and the "venerated persons" of the past, our story will one day depend on a future archivist finding "tongues in trees" to speak for us when the silence finally returns.

Ghosts on the Mountains: The Rise and Fall of Pocahontas County Industrial Settlements

Executive Summary

The high-altitude plateaus of Pocahontas County, West Virginia, represent a unique chapter in North American industrial history, characterized by a rapid transition from virgin wilderness to a global hub for timber and pulp extraction. Between 1900 and 1925, massive engineering feats, such as the Coal and Iron Railway, facilitated the creation of "societies in the clouds"—remote, high-elevation settlements like Spruce, Wildell, and May. These towns were designed for maximum resource extraction, often operating with modern amenities despite total geographic isolation.

The abandonment of these settlements was a planned consequence of resource depletion, leaving behind "ghost towns" that have since been reclaimed by the forest. Today, the history of this era is preserved through a combination of digital archiving—led by figures such as Norman Alderman—and modern interpretive tourism. This briefing examines the geological foundations, the engineering of the industrial boom, the specific case studies of vanished towns, and the ongoing efforts to document this ephemeral period of Appalachian history.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Geological and Ancestral Foundations

The history of Pocahontas County is rooted in its rugged topography, which dictated the patterns of both early habitation and later industrial exploitation.

Environmental Context

• Geological Formation: The Appalachian plateau was formed over millions of years through successive upheavals and subsidences. Erosion from wind and water deposited layers of silt and sediment that created the region’s coal beds and rocky outcrops.
• Topography: The landscape is defined by anticlinals and synclinals, sculpted by floods and frosts into deep valleys and high mountain plateaus.
• Waterways: The region contains the headwaters of several major rivers, including the Cheat, Greenbrier, Elk, and Gauley.

Pre-Industrial Settlement

Before the 20th century, the region was characterized by profound isolation.

• Indigenous Use: The land served primarily as a game reservation for indigenous populations, marked by Indian mounds and trails rather than permanent residence.
• Pioneer Transition: The first white settlers, largely of Scotch-Irish descent, established a "simple life" of subsistence farming in high-altitude meadows like Spruce Flats and the headwaters of Swago. Notable early families included the Adkissons and the Holmeses.
• Social Fabric: This era relied on oral tradition, where the "older venerated persons" of the county preserved a collective memory of every significant life incident.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Industrial Surge (1903–1925)

The isolation of the high Alleghenies was shattered in 1903 by the completion of the Coal and Iron Railway. This 47-mile line was a "stupendous engineering feat" involving giant cuts, tunnels, and complex bridgework, designed to access one of the last virgin forests in the Eastern United States.

The Engineering of Extraction

Industrial concerns, such as the West Virginia Pulp and Paper Company (WVP&P) and the Pocahontas Lumber Company, built entire towns to support their operations. These settlements were paradoxes of modern luxury and extreme isolation:

• Infrastructure: Towns were often accessible only by rail, with no connecting roads to the outside world.
• Amenities: Despite their remoteness, towns like Spruce featured electric lights, hot running water, and steam heat—luxuries rare in urban centers at the time.
• Labor: The workforce consisted of "woodhicks"—woodsmen who lived in company camps and earned between $1.75 and $2.00 a day. They wore "corks" (spiked work boots) for traction during the dangerous labor of preparing logs.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comparative Analysis of Major Settlements

The settlements of the West Fork and Cheat River watersheds were characterized by rapid construction and equally rapid abandonment once the surrounding timber was exhausted.

Town	Established	Abandoned	Primary Industry	Notable Metric
Spruce	1902	1925 (Mill)	Pulpwood / Coal	Elevation: 3,853 ft; "Highest/Coldest"
Wildell	1904	1915	Lumber	Total Output: 110 Million Board Feet
May	1904	1914	Lumber	Total Output: 100 Million Board Feet
Beulah	1903	1910	Lumber	Early use of rail incline systems

Case Study: Spruce, West Virginia

Marketed as the "highest and coldest town east of the Mississippi," Spruce was a dual settlement consisting of "Old Spruce" and a second community built to support a massive pulp mill.

• Climate: Residents observed frosts even during midsummer months.
• Housing: The town featured a 30-room hotel and a "Main Street" made of a wide boardwalk rather than pavement.
• Production: The mill produced pulpwood shipped in special slat-sided cars to paper mills in Virginia and Maryland.

Extraction Metrics

The scale of extraction was immense. For example, the mill at May produced 100 million board feet in its ten-year existence. Mathematically, this equates to approximately 33,333 board feet per day, assuming 300 working days per year.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Historiographical Preservation: Norman Alderman

The preservation of this history has transitioned from oral tradition to digital archiving. Norman Alderman, a former employee of the Pocahontas County Board of Education, has been a pivotal figure in the 21st century for democratizing access to primary historical texts.

The Digital Archive

Alderman’s work involves digitizing seminal texts and uploading them to platforms like Scribd and the Internet Archive.

• Foundational Records: He digitized the 653-page "History of Pocahontas County," ensuring that the records of pioneer ancestry and industrial development were not lost.
• Research Resources: His digital library includes collections of historical maps and family records, providing a vital resource for researchers of ghost towns.
• Metaphorical Engagement: His "Ghosts on the Mountains" project serves as both a literal archive and a engagement with the remnants of the past.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cultural Mythology and Modern Reclamation

The "ghost towns" have evolved into cultural symbols of loss and resilience, drawing explorers and historians to the ruins of the Alleghenies.

Folklore and Resilience

The narrative of Spruce has grown into regional folklore, fueled by its "eerie" reputation as a roadless, frozen industrial outpost. Local accounts preserved by archivists include anecdotes of panther attacks and warnings to lock smokehouses during dry weather, adding a human dimension to the industrial statistics.

Modern Tourism and Preservation

As the "noble trees" return through secondary growth, several projects aim to educate the public:

• Cass Scenic Railroad: Provides rail access to the remote site of Spruce, allowing tourists to view mill ruins.
• Your Forest History: An initiative by the Greenbrier Ranger District that installed 18 interpretive signs along the 22-mile West Fork Trail to record the history of vanished towns.
• Cheat Mountain Salamander: A train tour that offers travelers a view of the "stillness" of once-bustling industrial sites.

Conclusion

The towns of Pocahontas County were not failed settlements but highly successful, temporary industrial machines. Their legacy persists in the quiet meadows and overgrown foundations of the high ridges, recorded in digitized archives and interpretive trails. The transition from vibrant mill towns to silent ruins serves as a testament to the cycles of human endeavor and the relentless reclamation of nature.

The Unintended Effect on Recycling

 

Based on the policies in Pocahontas County, the answer is no, you will not receive money for your cans if you take them to the Dunmore transfer station and let them haul them.

The waste management and recycling system in Pocahontas County, which includes the Dunmore location, operates on a collection and hauling model, not a "cash for cans" or bottle deposit model. Your cans are collected as part of the county's waste reduction and sustainability efforts. The county then manages the process of transporting and processing the materials.

Generally, only states with specific "bottle bills" or deposit-refund systems pay consumers for returning cans. West Virginia is not one of those states. Additionally, while some private scrap metal yards do pay for aluminum cans by weight, this is not the case at the municipal Dunmore transfer station.

Taking your cans to the Dunmore location is a way to ensure they are properly recycled and to avoid them ending up in the landfill, even though there is no monetary incentive to do so.

Given the complex legal and community issues surrounding this situation, a simple legal Note on the Law like the one provided may not be sufficient to resolve the matter. The skepticism from the U.S. Supreme Court on flow control laws, and how they can be seen as a violation of the Commerce Clause, provides context to the conflict but does not directly address the localized waste management challenges.

Instead of only interpreting the law, a multi-faceted approach involving political and logical actions from the concerned communities and county officials could prove to be more effective. Finding common ground through collaborative problem-solving will likely yield better results.

Potential steps could include:

• Developing enhanced recycling and composting programs.

• Implementing strict enforcement and fines for improper disposal to help manage the overflow.

• Hosting community clean-up days to address immediate concerns about mess.

• Engaging with local businesses for support in maintaining a clean environment.

Furthermore, a comprehensive public awareness campaign to inform both tourists and residents about proper waste disposal practices is essential. While the provided legal Note on the Law highlights the historical skepticism of the U.S. Supreme Court on flow control, and how they have been found to violate the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, the situation requires a nuanced approach that considers both legal principles and practical solutions to address the localized challenges in Pocahontas County and Greenbrier County.

Imagine this news story after the Flow Control law is in effect

 

A complex issue has been unfolding in Greenbrier County, West Virginia, concerning the disposal of trash by tourists coming from neighboring Pocahontas County. This controversy pits local resident concerns about overwhelmed disposal infrastructure against tourist confusion and convenience, and it has centered on the specific use of public "Green Boxes" for waste.

The Source of the Waste

The issue centers on visitors to Pocahontas County, a major tourist destination that includes Snowshoe Mountain and a large portion of the Monongahela National Forest. Pocahontas County attracts a significant number of day-trip and short-term visitors, who naturally generate waste.

According to a letter from the Pocahontas County Solid Waste Authority (PCSWA), the problem is that Pocahontas County has only one transfer station for trash disposal, which is only open during limited weekday hours. Tourists leaving on Sundays, or arriving after hours, frequently find themselves in Pocahontas County with trash but nowhere to dump it legally within the county before leaving for the weekend.

Many of these visitors, as they travel home, bring their accumulated trash across the border into Greenbrier County.

The Destination: Greenbrier County Green Boxes

Once in Greenbrier County, many of these tourists stop at and use public roadside dumpsters known as "Green Boxes."

These Green Boxes were explicitly designed for the use of Greenbrier County residents, particularly those in areas where curbside trash pickup is not available. They are meant to be a convenient disposal solution funded by the local community.

The Local Controversy: Residents vs. Tourists

The fundamental conflict arises because Greenbrier County residents argue that the Green Boxes are being overwhelmed by an influx of trash generated in a completely different county (Pocahontas).

Local residents have raised several complaints:

• System Overload: Green Boxes, designed for local residential use, are often found completely overflowing and buried in trash, creating a significant public mess.

• Aesthetics and Hygiene: Overflowing trash attracts wildlife, smells, and creates an eyesore on public roadsides.

• Cost Burden: Greenbrier County taxpayers are, in effect, subsidizing the disposal of waste generated by tourism in a different county. They believe that Pocahontas County, which benefits economically from the tourism, should also bear the burden and the cost of managing the waste it generates.

This has led to heated community discussions, with some residents aggressively policing the dumpsters, taking license plate numbers of cars with non-local plates (e.g., Maryland or Virginia), and reporting them to authorities for "illegal dumping."

The Greenbrier County Solid Waste Authority (GCSWA) has installed a surveillance camera and has been actively fining and even citing non-residents who use the containers, treating it as illegal dumping. A sign on one major dumping spot clearly states "GREENBOXES RESERVED FOR GREENBRIER RESIDENTS."

Possible Solutions

The situation is widely seen as untenable in its current state. Proposed solutions have focused on addressing the infrastructure deficit in Pocahontas County, which is the root of the problem:

• Pocahontas County SWA Action: The PCSWA has been called upon to expand its hours of operation at the existing transfer station or to establish a secondary drop-off location that is accessible and convenient for departing tourists, especially on Sunday evenings.

• Tourism Industry Responsibility: Another proposed solution is for large tourism operators within Pocahontas County (such as resorts and rentals) to be required to manage all waste generated by their guests on-site, using commercial hauling contracts, rather than expecting tourists to transport and dispose of the trash themselves. This would internalize the cost of waste management into the tourism business model.

In summary, this conflict is not just about trash; it is a jurisdictional and economic dispute over who is responsible for the negative consequences of tourism. It highlights the strain that can be put on local infrastructure when neighboring regions have vastly different levels of services and amenities.

Nightmare

 

The decentralized Green Box system of unattended dumpsters will remain a necessity for Pocahontas County, as private haulers are unwilling to provide affordable curbside collection to remote mountainous residences. However, the transition to a regional transfer station model will force significant logistical and financial changes upon the system.

Financial Impacts and Fee Increases To fund the costly transition to the new transfer station, the annual Green Box fee is projected to increase dramatically. Currently set at $120 per year, officials estimate the fee may need to rise to between $300 and $600 per household to cover the new operating costs. To help mitigate this massive hike, the Solid Waste Authority (SWA) is considering expanding the fee base by assessing the fee on all deeded properties in the county, including unimproved lots and farms, rather than just occupied residences. Additionally, the County Commission has proposed a "Green Box Fee assistance" program to help elderly residents on fixed incomes manage the sudden cost jump.

Logistical Challenges and Weekend Operations The Green Box system currently requires collection seven days a week to prevent the boxes from overflowing. A major impending crisis is that the regional destination landfills, such as the one in Greenbrier County, operate on traditional industrial schedules—closing early on Saturdays and remaining entirely closed on Sundays. Landfill Manager Chris McComb has warned that this creates a massive logistical gap for weekend waste; if the Green Boxes cannot be emptied over the weekend, they will overflow and likely trigger increased illegal dumping and cleanup costs.

Stricter Enforcement and Abandoned Upgrades The SWA previously considered upgrading the low-tech Green Boxes to higher-efficiency compactor sites to reduce pickup frequency, but the upfront capital costs for the equipment were deemed too high. Instead, the system will require stricter enforcement to maintain its financial viability. Because the system is plagued by vandalism and unauthorized use, the SWA must aggressively prevent commercial businesses and tourists from illegally dumping waste into the residential Green Boxes, which drives up the county's disposal costs without generating corresponding revenue.

Ultimately, the SWA has argued that adopting "Flow Control" (mandating all waste goes to the new transfer station) is an absolute necessity; without it, the authority could face bankruptcy, which would lead to a total collapse of the Green Box system that serves the county's most remote residents.

Beware!

 

Based on data from the Pocahontas County Assessor's office and land valuation platforms, the number of deeded parcels in Pocahontas County, West Virginia, ranges between approximately 14,500 and 16,800, depending on the inclusion of specific parcel types like agricultural or utility-related land.

Parcel Count Breakdown

Data Source	Reported Parcel Count	Scope/Type
Acres GIS (2026)	16,839	Total parcel records
FBN AcreVision	14,552	Specifically agricultural/plat map parcels
AcreValue	14,737	"Fields" and ownership plots

---

Key Data Insights

• Tax Assessments: Current counts are generally tied to the July 1, 2024, data collection period used for the 2025 tax assessments.

• Land Use Categories: The parcels are categorized by the Assessor into several classes, which may account for the variation in reported numbers:

  • Residential (101-105): Single-family homes to mixed-use.

  • Condominiums (106-107): Fee simple and common elements (relevant to your interest in Snowshoe property regimes).

  • Exempt (X): Public lands and non-taxable entities.

• GIS Limitations: While platforms like MapWV provide search tools, the public viewing results are often capped at 500–1,000 records per search, making the total county-wide aggregate only accessible through specific statistical reports or direct assessor databases.

The Assessor's office (led by Johnny Pritt) maintains the most granular "taxable unit" count, which often differs slightly from the "deeded boundary" count provided by GIS mapping services.

Are you looking for the parcel breakdown of a specific district, such as Green Bank or Edray, for your analysis?

In the Edray District (District 03), there are approximately 3,800 to 4,200 deeded parcels.

This district is the most complex in Pocahontas County to calculate because it contains both the Town of Marlinton (an incorporated municipality) and the high-density developments around Snowshoe Mountain Resort.

Edray District Parcel Distribution

Area	Estimated Parcels	Characteristics
Marlinton (Corp)	~1,150	Small, high-density residential and commercial lots.
Rural Edray	~2,200	Larger agricultural tracts and riverfront properties.
Snowshoe/Silver Creek	~850*	High volume of "stacked" condominium units and resort sub-parcels.

Note on Snowshoe: Because many properties at Snowshoe are organized under condominium regimes, a single physical "footprint" on a tax map may actually represent dozens of deeded interior parcels (Class 106/107).

Administrative Details for your Research:

• District Code: For GIS and database queries, Edray is designated as District 03.

• Tax Maps: There are over 60 specific tax maps just for the Edray District (ranging from Map 1 to Map 60+). Map 34 and 35 are particularly dense as they cover the central Edray/Marlinton interface.

• Data Source: The Pocahontas County Assessor’s Office (located at 900 10th Avenue in Marlinton) maintains the "Master Summary Table" which provides the exact year-end count for the 2025-2026 tax cycle.