Create a report on the resurrection of Christ. Begin with his burial and conclude with the resurrection. Include a historical and theological background of the event. Use the King James version of the Bible when referencing verses. Conclude with a complete outline of the report.
The Burial and Resurrection of Jesus Christ: A Historical, Theological, and Narrative Analysis Based on the King James Version
I. Introduction
A. The Centrality of the Resurrection
The resurrection of Jesus Christ stands as the foundational event and cardinal doctrine of the Christian faith. As articulated by the Apostle Paul, "if Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain, and your faith is also vain" (1 Corinthians 15:14 KJV). Beyond its significance as a historical claim, the resurrection is presented in Christian scripture and tradition as the ultimate divine validation of Jesus' identity and mission, the source of hope for believers, and the catalyst that transformed a group of despairing followers into the progenitors of a global movement. Its proclamation formed the core of early apostolic preaching and remains central to Christian theology, worship, and eschatological hope.
B. Report Scope and Methodology
This report undertakes a detailed examination of the events surrounding the resurrection, commencing with the burial of Jesus following his crucifixion on Golgotha and concluding with the initial discovery of the empty tomb and the earliest recorded post-resurrection appearances. The analysis adheres strictly to the narrative accounts presented in the four Gospels—Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John—as rendered in the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible, a translation authorized in 1604 and published in 1611, which became the standard for English-speaking Protestants for centuries.1 Reliable online sources provide access to the KJV text for reference.3 To provide a richer understanding of the Gospel narratives, this report integrates relevant historical context concerning Roman practices and Jewish customs prevalent in first-century Judea, drawing upon archaeological findings 8 and literary sources. Furthermore, it explores the theological landscape of Second Temple Judaism, particularly beliefs surrounding death, the afterlife, resurrection, and Messianic expectations 10, providing a framework for interpreting the significance of the events described.
II. The Setting: Historical and Theological Landscape of First-Century Judea
Understanding the events surrounding Jesus' death and resurrection requires situating them within the complex political, social, and religious milieu of first-century Judea. This involves examining the harsh realities of Roman rule, including the practice of crucifixion, alongside contemporary Jewish perspectives on death, burial, and the anticipated future redemption.
A. Judea Under Roman Rule and the Reality of Crucifixion
1. Roman Occupation and Jewish Sentiment
In the first century CE, Judea existed as a province under Roman administration, a situation marked by recurrent tensions between the occupying power and segments of the Jewish population. Roman governors maintained order, collected taxes, and held the ultimate authority, including the power of capital punishment. This period witnessed sporadic uprisings and simmering resentment against foreign rule, often met with brutal Roman suppression. The Roman general Varus's crucifixion of 2,000 Jews in 4 BCE following unrest serves as a stark example of Rome's methods for quelling dissent.12 Josephus, the first-century Romano-Jewish historian, documents numerous instances of crucifixion employed against rebels and perceived threats to Roman authority in Judea.12
2. Crucifixion as Roman Capital Punishment
Crucifixion was a method of execution employed by various ancient powers, including the Persians and Carthaginians, but it was refined and extensively utilized by the Romans.12 It was widely regarded as one of the most brutal and shameful forms of death (summum supplicium), typically reserved for individuals considered outside the protection of Roman law or guilty of specific heinous crimes: slaves, foreigners, pirates, disgraced soldiers, and especially political insurgents.12 Roman citizens were generally exempt, reflecting the punishment's profound social stigma.12 The Roman orator Cicero famously declared that the very word "cross" should be far removed from the thoughts, eyes, and ears of Roman citizens, underscoring the deep cultural aversion to this form of execution.14
The process itself was designed for maximum pain and public humiliation.12 Condemnation was often preceded by severe scourging with a flagellum, a whip designed to lacerate the flesh, weakening the victim significantly.12 Contrary to popular depictions, the condemned typically carried only the horizontal crossbeam (patibulum) to the execution site, where the vertical stake (stipes) was permanently fixed.8
At the site, the victim was stripped and either tied or nailed to the patibulum. Archaeological and literary evidence suggests variation in method; while nailing through the wrists or forearms was possible 16, some analyses of skeletal remains and literary sources suggest tying the arms was also common.8 The patibulum was then hoisted onto the stipes. The feet were subsequently secured to the upright beam, again either by nailing or tying. The discovery in 1968 at Giv'at ha'Mivtar, near Jerusalem, of the skeletal remains of a first-century Jewish man named Yehohanan, crucified by the Romans, provides tangible evidence.9 His heel bones were found pierced by a single large iron nail, driven through a small wooden plaque likely intended to prevent him from pulling his feet free.8 While initial analysis suggested both heels were pierced together with the legs contorted 8, later re-examination proposed the legs likely straddled the upright beam, with each heel nailed separately.8
A titulus, or plaque stating the condemned's name and crime, was often displayed.13 Death was typically slow, resulting from a combination of factors including blood loss, shock, dehydration, and ultimately asphyxiation, as the body's weight made breathing progressively difficult.8 To hasten death, particularly if required by local custom or circumstance, Roman soldiers might break the victim's legs (crurifragium), preventing them from pushing up to inhale.9
The extreme degradation inherent in Roman crucifixion creates a powerful theological tension when considering the central Christian claim that Jesus, executed in this manner, is the Messiah and Lord. The cross, intended by Rome as the ultimate symbol of shame, defeat, and subjugation 12, becomes, through the lens of resurrection faith, the paradoxical site of divine glory and salvation.
This transformation required a radical theological reinterpretation by the early followers of Jesus, who proclaimed that God's power, demonstrated in the resurrection, overturned the verdict of Rome and the apparent finality of the cross.
Furthermore, the specific interaction between Roman procedures and Jewish religious law is evident in the practice of crurifragium. While Roman crucifixions could last for hours or even days 12, Jewish law, citing Deuteronomy 21:23, mandated that the body of an executed person not remain exposed overnight, requiring burial before sunset.19 This was especially critical before a Sabbath or festival day.13 Consequently, in Judea, breaking the legs to expedite death was sometimes employed specifically to comply with this religious requirement.13
This intersection highlights the unique cultural and legal context of Jesus' crucifixion, lending historical plausibility to the Gospel of John's account of the request made to Pilate concerning the victims crucified alongside Jesus (John 19:31 KJV) and making the observation that Jesus' legs were not broken particularly noteworthy (John 19:33 KJV).
B. Jewish Perspectives on Death, Burial, and the World Beyond
1. Burial Customs
Jewish tradition placed strong emphasis on the respectful and prompt burial of the dead, considered a religious duty (mitzvah) incumbent upon the community.19 As noted, burial was ideally to occur on the day of death, before sunset, a practice underscored by the commandment in Deuteronomy 21:23 regarding executed individuals.19 Delay was particularly avoided before the Sabbath or a major festival.19
Preparation of the body involved several steps: the eyes were closed, the body was washed, and then anointed with aromatic oils and spices, such as myrrh and aloes.20 It was then wrapped in linen cloths or shrouds (tachrichim).20 In cases of violent death where significant blood was shed, Jewish law required that the blood be buried along with the body, meaning the body might not be washed in the usual manner, and bloodstained garments would be included in the burial.22 The body was typically carried to the tomb on a bier, not usually in a coffin, though wooden coffins were used in some periods.19
Jewish cemeteries in the Second Temple period were located outside city limits to maintain ritual purity within populated areas.23 The most common form of burial for those who could afford it was in rock-hewn family tombs.18 These tombs typically consisted of a central chamber, sometimes with a pit in the floor to allow standing room, and benches (arcosolia) or, more commonly, narrow, tunnel-like niches (kokhim or loculi) cut into the walls where bodies were placed.18 These family tombs were used over generations.18 The entrance was sealed with a heavy blocking stone, often square, or sometimes a large, disc-shaped rolling stone (golal).20 Simpler, individual trench graves dug into the earth also existed, likely for the less affluent.20
A distinctive feature of Jewish burial practices, particularly prominent from the first century BCE to the first century CE, was secondary burial (ossilegium).10 Approximately one year after the initial burial (primary burial), once the flesh had decomposed, family members would return to the tomb, collect the bones, and place them in a stone box known as an ossuary.9 These ossuaries, often made of local limestone and sometimes decorated or inscribed with the deceased's name, were then stored within the family tomb, allowing space for new primary burials.9 Thousands of such ossuaries have been discovered in the vicinity of Jerusalem.9 This practice is often linked by scholars to developing beliefs in the resurrection of the dead, providing a means of preserving the physical remains until that time.9
Against this backdrop of communal family tombs frequently containing the remains of multiple individuals, often gathered into ossuaries, the repeated emphasis in the Gospels that Jesus was laid in a new tomb, hewn for Joseph of Arimathaea, in which "never man before was laid" (Luke 23:53 KJV; cf. Matt 27:60; John 19:41 KJV) 21, takes on considerable significance. Standard practice involved multi-generational use and the potential commingling or relocation of remains during secondary burial.9 Placing Jesus in a previously unoccupied tomb effectively eliminates potential confusion regarding the identity of the body or the possibility that his remains were simply disturbed or relocated as part of routine tomb management or ossilegium.
This specific detail provides a clearer foundation for the subsequent claim that the specific tomb intended for Jesus was found empty, directly supporting the narrative of his unique, bodily resurrection.
2. Beliefs about Afterlife and Resurrection
Jewish thought concerning the afterlife during the Second Temple period was not monolithic but encompassed a spectrum of beliefs.11 Earlier Hebrew Bible texts often depict Sheol as a shadowy, undifferentiated underworld, the destination for all the dead, righteous and wicked alike, characterized by a diminished, ethereal existence rather than reward or punishment.11
However, by the late Second Temple period, distinct viewpoints had emerged among major Jewish groups.24 The Sadducees, largely composed of the priestly aristocracy, are generally understood to have rejected concepts of soul immortality and bodily resurrection, adhering to a stricter interpretation of the Torah that emphasized divine justice operating within the present life.24 In contrast, the Pharisees, a group influential among the populace, affirmed both the immortality of the soul and the future resurrection of the dead.11 The Essenes, known from the Dead Sea Scrolls and other sources, also held beliefs in an afterlife, though details vary.24
Where resurrection was affirmed, it was predominantly conceived as a bodily event 25, distinct from Greek ideas of inherent soul immortality. This belief finds explicit, though rare, expression within the Hebrew Bible itself, notably in Daniel 12:2 ("And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt" KJV) 11 and Isaiah 26:19 ("Thy dead men shall live, together with my dead body shall they arise. Awake and sing, ye that dwell in dust..." KJV).11 Rabbinic literature later elaborated on this, viewing resurrection as a cornerstone doctrine tied to the Messianic Age and the final judgment.11 There were differing opinions on the scope of the resurrection – whether it included only the righteous, the righteous and the exceedingly wicked, or all humanity.25 Some traditions also developed the concept of Gehinnom (Gehenna), often understood not as eternal hell but as a place of post-mortem purification for souls before their ascent to Gan Eden (Paradise), typically lasting no more than a year.24
The early Christian proclamation of Jesus' resurrection thus entered a complex and contested theological arena. The claim was not merely that Jesus' soul survived death, a belief shared with Pharisees and others.11 Rather, it was the assertion that Jesus had already experienced a bodily resurrection, prior to the general resurrection expected at the end of days.11 This claim was radical in its specificity and timing. While it resonated with existing Pharisaic hopes for bodily resurrection, it challenged the prevailing understanding of that resurrection as a future, collective event. Furthermore, it directly contradicted the Sadducean denial of any resurrection.24
The assertion that one specific individual had been raised bodily from the dead, inaugurating the promised resurrection, was therefore both potentially comprehensible within certain Jewish frameworks and simultaneously a profound challenge to established norms and theological positions.
C. Messianic Hopes and Expectations in the First Century
The first century CE was a period of fervent Messianic expectation among many Jews, fueled by prophetic writings, historical circumstances under Roman rule, and apocalyptic literature. However, there was no single, universally agreed-upon portrait of the expected Messiah.31
1. Diversity of Expectations
Jewish texts from the Second Temple period reveal a range of Messianic concepts.31 Expectations varied, sometimes focusing more on a coming Messianic Age of peace and restoration than on a specific individual figure.31 When a figure was envisioned, conceptions included a kingly ruler, a priestly figure, a prophet, or even a combination or succession of figures.31
2. The Davidic King
Perhaps the most prominent expectation was for a royal Messiah, a descendant of King David, who would fulfill prophecies of national restoration.31 This figure was expected to liberate Israel from foreign domination (particularly Rome), gather the Jewish diaspora back to the Land of Israel, potentially rebuild or purify the Temple in Jerusalem, defeat Israel's enemies, and establish a reign of justice, peace, and adherence to God's Law.31 This expectation often carried strong political and military connotations.
3. Other Figures
Beyond the Davidic king, other Messianic paradigms existed. The Qumran community, known from the Dead Sea Scrolls, anticipated two Messianic figures: a royal Messiah ("Messiah of Israel") and a priestly Messiah ("Messiah of Aaron"), with the priestly figure often holding precedence.31 Some expected a prophet like Moses, who might perform signs and wonders.31 Apocalyptic texts, such as parts of 1 Enoch, described a pre-existent, heavenly "Son of Man," an angelic figure endowed with divine authority to execute judgment and inaugurate the new age.34
Some later Jewish traditions also developed the idea of a suffering Messiah, Messiah ben Joseph (son of Joseph), who would precede the triumphant Messiah ben David, potentially dying in battle before being resurrected.34
4. Messianic Age
The arrival of the Messiah or the dawn of the Messianic Age was associated with profound transformation: the ingathering of the exiles, the restoration of the Temple, universal recognition of the God of Israel, an era of unprecedented peace and prosperity, and, in many traditions, the resurrection of the dead.24 Some apocalyptic scenarios envisioned a temporary Messianic kingdom on earth as a transitional phase before the final judgment and the eternal age to come.37
The dominant expectation of a victorious, conquering, ruling Messiah 31 created an immediate and profound conflict with the manner of Jesus' death. Crucifixion represented the antithesis of victory; it was the ultimate symbol of Roman power, degradation, and the victim's utter failure to challenge that power.12 To proclaim a man executed by Rome as Israel's Messiah required overcoming immense cognitive dissonance, a difficulty reflected even among Jesus' own disciples (cf. Peter's reaction in Matthew 16:22 KJV, noted in 31).
The narrative of the resurrection, therefore, becomes the indispensable element that resolves this paradox. It functions as the divine act of vindication, reframing Jesus' death not as defeat but as a necessary, albeit unexpected, path to a different kind of victory and the inauguration of God's kingdom.
While the suffering and death of the Messiah were not mainstream expectations, the existence of traditions like the Suffering Servant of Isaiah 53 (interpreted Messianically by early Christians 31) and the concept of Messiah ben Joseph 34, coupled with the established link between the Messianic Age and resurrection 34, provided theological resources for the early church. These allowed Jesus' followers to interpret his crucifixion not as a disqualification but as the fulfillment of a specific, albeit less common, aspect of Messianic expectation.
His resurrection was then understood as the "firstfruits" (1 Corinthians 15:20 KJV) of the general resurrection, signaling the arrival, or inauguration, of the Messianic Age, even if its full consummation was yet to come.37 This concept of inaugurated eschatology addressed the apparent delay in the establishment of the full, earthly kingdom anticipated by many.37
III. "He Made His Grave with the Rich": The Burial of Jesus (KJV Narrative)
The Gospel accounts, read through the lens of first-century customs and laws, provide a detailed narrative of Jesus' burial, emphasizing its haste due to the impending Sabbath, the unexpected involvement of prominent individuals, and the specific nature of the tomb.
A. Securing the Body and Sabbath Preparations
The timing of Jesus' death late on Friday afternoon created immediate urgency. Mark explicitly notes the time as "the preparation, that is, the day before the sabbath" (Mark 15:42 KJV). John adds that this particular Sabbath was "an high day" (John 19:31 KJV), likely indicating it coincided with the Passover festival, adding to its solemnity. Luke states simply, "that day was the preparation, and the sabbath drew on" (Luke 23:54 KJV). This urgency directly reflects the Jewish legal requirement (Deut. 21:23) to bury the dead before sunset, especially prior to the Sabbath rest when such work was forbidden.19
Reflecting the intersection of Roman execution practice and Jewish law, John records that "the Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day... besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away" (John 19:31 KJV). This request for crurifragium aimed to hasten the deaths of the two thieves crucified alongside Jesus, allowing for their burial before the Sabbath began [Insight 2]. However, when the soldiers came to Jesus, "they saw that he was dead already, [and] brake not his legs" (John 19:33 KJV). Instead, to confirm his death, "one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water" (John 19:34 KJV).
B. The Ministry of Joseph of Arimathaea and Nicodemus
In this context of haste and the official handling of executed bodies, the initiative passed to Joseph of Arimathaea. He is described variously as "an honourable counsellor" (Mark 15:43 KJV), indicating a member of the Sanhedrin; "a rich man" (Matt 27:57 KJV); "a good man, and a just," who had not consented to the council's actions against Jesus (Luke 23:50-51 KJV); and a disciple of Jesus, "but secretly for fear of the Jews" (John 19:38 KJV). Overcoming his previous fear, Joseph "went in boldly unto Pilate, and craved the body of Jesus" (Mark 15:43 KJV; cf. Matt 27:58; Luke 23:52; John 19:38 KJV). Pilate, surprised Jesus was already dead, summoned the centurion to confirm the death before granting Joseph's request (Mark 15:44-45 KJV).
Joseph was then joined by Nicodemus, identified as the Pharisee "which at the first came to Jesus by night" (John 19:39 KJV; cf. John 3:1-2 KJV). Nicodemus brought a significant quantity of spices, "a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about an hundred pound weight" (John 19:39 KJV).
The actions of Joseph and Nicodemus carried considerable personal risk. Identifying publicly with Jesus, a man condemned and executed by Roman authority on charges implying sedition 12, could have severe repercussions for men of their standing. Handling a corpse incurred ritual impurity according to Jewish law 22, and associating with a perceived enemy of the state could invite suspicion from both Roman officials and potentially hostile elements within the Jewish leadership.17
"Joseph, as a "rich man" and "honourable counsellor" [Matt 27:57, Mark 15:43 KJV], and Nicodemus, likely also a man of status, demonstrated profound courage and devotion by undertaking this task, moving from secret discipleship to public identification at the moment of greatest apparent defeat.
C. The Act of Burial: Linen, Spices, and the New Tomb
Having received Pilate's permission, Joseph (and Nicodemus) took the body down from the cross. Following Jewish burial custom 20, they "wrapped it in a clean linen cloth" (Matt 27:59 KJV) or "linen clothes" (plural in Luke 23:53, John 19:40 KJV), incorporating the large quantity of myrrh and aloes brought by Nicodemus, "as the manner of the Jews is to bury" (John 19:40 KJV).
The extraordinary amount of spices—approximately 75 pounds or 34 kilograms—mentioned by John 21 warrants attention. While anointing with spices was customary 20, this quantity far exceeds typical practice. It may suggest an act of profound reverence, perhaps signifying royal honor bestowed upon Jesus by Nicodemus. Alternatively, given the haste and the inability to complete full burial rites before the Sabbath, the lavish application of these aromatic resins might represent an attempt, however temporary, to counteract decomposition until further preparations could be made after the Sabbath rest. This contrasts with the intent of the women later, who planned to bring more spices to anoint the body properly (Mark 16:1, Luke 24:1 KJV).
The prepared body was then laid "in his own new tomb, which he [Joseph] had hewn out in the rock" (Matt 27:60 KJV). Mark concurs it was "a sepulchre which was hewn out of a rock" (Mark 15:46 KJV), while Luke and John emphasize it was a tomb "wherein never man before was laid" (Luke 23:53; John 19:41 KJV). This detail, as previously discussed, is crucial for distinguishing this burial site and preempting claims of mistaken identity or routine disturbance [Insight 3]. John specifies the tomb was located "in the place where he was crucified... [in] a garden" (John 19:41 KJV), allowing for a swift burial due to proximity and the approaching Sabbath (John 19:42 KJV).
Finally, Joseph "rolled a great stone to the door of the sepulchre, and departed" (Matt 27:60 KJV; cf. Mark 15:46 KJV). This method of sealing the tomb aligns with archaeological evidence of burial practices in the period.20 Several women witnessed these proceedings. Matthew names "Mary Magdalene, and the other Mary" sitting opposite the tomb (Matt 27:61 KJV). Mark identifies "Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of Joses" beholding where he was laid (Mark 15:47 KJV). Luke describes "the women also, which came with him from Galilee," who "beheld the sepulchre, and how his body was laid," after which they returned to prepare their own spices and ointments, resting on the Sabbath according to the commandment (Luke 23:55-56 KJV).
IV. "Setting a Watch": The Sealing and Guarding of the Tomb (KJV Narrative - Matthew Account)
The Gospel of Matthew includes a unique narrative detailing measures taken by the Jewish leadership to secure the tomb after Jesus' burial.
A. The Concerns of the Jewish Leadership
According to Matthew, "the next day that followed the day of the preparation" (i.e., the Sabbath itself), "the chief priests and Pharisees came together unto Pilate" (Matt 27:62 KJV). Their purpose was specific: they recalled Jesus' own words, "Sir, we remember that that deceiver said, while he was yet alive, After three days I will rise again" (Matt 27:63 KJV). This indicates their awareness of Jesus' resurrection predictions. Fearing the disciples might exploit this, they requested Pilate take preventative action: "Command therefore that the sepulchre be made sure until the third day, lest his disciples come by night, and steal him away, and say unto the people, He is risen from the dead: so the last error shall be worse than the first" (Matt 27:64 KJV). Their concern was that a fraudulent claim of resurrection, based on a stolen body, would cause greater turmoil than Jesus' activities during his lifetime.
B. Pilate's Decree and the Roman Guard
Pilate acceded to their request, delegating the responsibility back to them: "Pilate said unto them, Ye have a watch: go your way, make it as sure as ye can" (Matt 27:65 KJV). The term "watch" could refer either to a detachment of Roman soldiers under Pilate's command or possibly the Temple guard, which operated under Roman oversight. Regardless of the precise identity, the deployment represented an official security measure. Consequently, "they went, and made the sepulchre sure, sealing the stone, and setting a watch" (Matt 27:66 KJV). The seal, likely bearing an official Roman or Sanhedrin insignia, served as a formal closure, making any unauthorized tampering a serious offense against authority.
Matthew's inclusion of this episode serves a distinct purpose within his narrative. By detailing the precautions taken by Jesus' opponents—the very individuals motivated to disprove any resurrection claim—Matthew preemptively addresses the most immediate and obvious naturalistic explanation for an empty tomb: that the disciples stole the body. The placement of an official guard and the application of a seal [Matt 27:65-66] are presented as formidable obstacles, rendering clandestine removal of the body by the disciples highly improbable, if not impossible. This narrative element aims to strengthen the case for a supernatural event by attempting to eliminate the primary alternative explanation. It also sets the stage for the subsequent account of the guards' report to the authorities following the events of the resurrection morning [Matt 28:11-15].
V. "He is Risen": The Discovery and Proclamation of the Resurrection (KJV Narrative)
All four Gospels converge on the morning of the first day of the week (Sunday) as the time when the absence of Jesus' body from the tomb was discovered, though they present complementary perspectives and details regarding the individuals involved and the sequence of events.
A. The First Day of the Week: The Women, the Stone, and the Angels
The KJV accounts describe women arriving at the tomb very early: "In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week" (Matt 28:1 KJV); "very early in the morning the first day of the week... at the rising of the sun" (Mark 16:1-2 KJV); "very early in the morning" (Luke 24:1 KJV); "when it was yet dark" (John 20:1 KJV). The named women vary slightly but consistently include Mary Magdalene [Matt 28:1, Mark 16:1, Luke 24:10, John 20:1 KJV]. Others mentioned are "the other Mary" (likely Mary the mother of James and Joses) [Matt 28:1 KJV], Salome [Mark 16:1 KJV], Joanna, and Mary the mother of James [Luke 24:10 KJV]. Their purpose, as stated in Mark and Luke, was to complete the burial rites by anointing Jesus' body with the spices they had prepared [Mark 16:1, Luke 24:1 KJV], an action prevented by the Sabbath's arrival on Friday evening.
Upon arrival, they encounter extraordinary circumstances. Matthew describes a dramatic scene: "there was a great earthquake: for the angel of the Lord descended from heaven, and came and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it. His countenance was like lightning, and his raiment white as snow: And for fear of him the keepers [guards] did shake, and became as dead men" (Matt 28:2-4 KJV). The other Gospels simply state the women found the stone already rolled away from the tomb entrance [Mark 16:4, Luke 24:2, John 20:1 KJV].
Inside or near the now-open tomb, the women encounter angelic beings who deliver the first proclamation of the resurrection.
In Matthew, the single angel sitting on the stone addresses Mary Magdalene and the other Mary: "Fear not ye: for I know that ye seek Jesus, which was crucified. He is not here: for he is risen, as he said. Come, see the place where the Lord lay. And go quickly, and tell his disciples that he is risen from the dead; and, behold, he goeth before you into Galilee; there shall ye see him" (Matt 28:5-7 KJV).
In Mark, Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, and Salome enter the tomb and see "a young man sitting on the right side, clothed in a long white garment" (Mark 16:5 KJV). He tells them, "Be not affrighted: Ye seek Jesus of Nazareth, which was crucified: he is risen; he is not here: behold the place where they laid him. But go your way, tell his disciples and Peter that he goeth before you into Galilee: there shall ye see him, as he said unto you" (Mark 16:6-7 KJV). Mark uniquely adds that the women fled trembling and amazed, initially saying nothing "for they were afraid" (Mark 16:8 KJV).
In Luke, the women from Galilee find the tomb empty, and as they were perplexed, "behold, two men stood by them in shining garments" (Luke 24:3-4 KJV). These figures ask, "Why seek ye the living among the dead? He is not here, but is risen: remember how he spake unto you when he was yet in Galilee, Saying, The Son of man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and the third day rise again" (Luke 24:5-7 KJV). Remembering his words, the women return and report everything to the eleven apostles and others, but their words "seemed to them as idle tales, and they believed them not" (Luke 24:8-11 KJV).
In John, Mary Magdalene arrives alone first, sees the stone taken away, and immediately runs to inform Peter and John, assuming the body has been removed: "They have taken away the Lord out of the sepulchre, and we know not where they have laid him" (John 20:1-2 KJV). Only later, after Peter and John have visited the tomb and left, does Mary, weeping outside the tomb, look in and see "two angels in white sitting, the one at the head, and the other at the feet, where the body of Jesus had lain" (John 20:11-12 KJV). They ask why she weeps, and she repeats her concern about the body being taken (John 20:13 KJV).
The following table summarizes key comparative points from the KJV accounts of the initial discovery:
Table: Comparison of KJV Gospel Accounts: Discovery of the Empty Tomb
The consistent placement of women as the first witnesses to the empty tomb and recipients of the resurrection message across all four Gospels is historically noteworthy. In the socio-legal environment of first-century Judea and the broader Roman world, the testimony of women often carried less weight than that of men in formal or legal contexts. If the resurrection accounts were later fabrications designed for maximum persuasive effect, featuring prominent male disciples as the primary discoverers might have seemed a more strategic choice. The unanimous testimony of the Gospels that women played this primary role, despite the potential cultural hurdles to its acceptance, strongly suggests that this element reflects a core historical memory faithfully preserved in the earliest Christian traditions, rather than a later invention.
The variations in specific details—the exact number and appearance of the angels/messengers, their precise location (inside or outside the tomb), the specific women named, and their immediate reactions—are often highlighted by critics as contradictions. However, viewed through the lens of historical testimony, such variations are characteristic of multiple, independent accounts of a complex and startling event. Different individuals arriving at slightly different times or focusing on different aspects of the scene would naturally result in reports with overlapping cores but differing peripheral details. The fundamental agreement across the Gospels—women arrived early on the first day, found the stone moved and the tomb empty, and received a divine message proclaiming Jesus' resurrection—remains robust. These variations likely point to the existence of several converging streams of eyewitness tradition drawn upon by the Gospel writers, rather than indicating fabrication or irreconcilable conflict.
B. The Empty Tomb Verified by Disciples
John's Gospel provides the most detailed account of the male disciples' verification of the women's initial report. Upon hearing Mary Magdalene's distressed cry that the Lord's body had been taken (John 20:2 KJV), "Peter therefore went forth, and that other disciple [traditionally identified as John], and came to the sepulchre" (John 20:3 KJV). They ran together, with the "other disciple" outrunning Peter and arriving first (John 20:4 KJV). Stooping down, he saw the linen grave clothes lying inside but did not enter immediately (John 20:5 KJV). Peter then arrived, went directly into the tomb, and observed the scene: "he seeth the linen clothes lie, And the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself" (John 20:6-7 KJV). Luke provides a briefer, parallel account: Peter "ran unto the sepulchre; and stooping down, he beheld the linen clothes laid by themselves, and departed, wondering in himself at that which was come to pass" (Luke 24:12 KJV). After Peter entered, John also went in, "and he saw, and believed" (John 20:8 KJV), though the narrator adds the clarifying comment that "as yet they knew not the scripture, that he must rise again from the dead" (John 20:9 KJV).
The specific detail regarding the state of the grave clothes, particularly the head napkin being folded neatly and placed separately from the body wrappings [John 20:6-7 KJV], carries significant weight in the narrative. This observation stands as implicit evidence against the explanation of simple grave robbery or hasty removal of the body. Thieves would likely have either taken the body still wrapped in its valuable linen or, if unwrapping it, would probably have left the cloths in disarray. The orderly arrangement, especially the carefully folded napkin, suggests a deliberate and unhurried departure, inconsistent with theft or desecration. For the author of John's Gospel, this visual evidence appears to be a catalyst for belief (John 20:8 KJV), implying that the state of the grave clothes pointed away from human intervention and towards the reality of the resurrection.
C. The Initial Appearances of the Risen Christ
Following the discovery and verification of the empty tomb, the Gospels record appearances of the risen Jesus himself. According to John and Mark, the very first appearance was to Mary Magdalene. John describes her lingering weeping outside the tomb after Peter and John had left. She encounters Jesus, initially mistaking him for the gardener, until he calls her by name, "Mary." Recognizing him, she exclaims "Rabboni" (Master) [John 20:11-16 KJV]. Jesus then commissions her: "Go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God" (John 20:17 KJV). Mary obeys, telling the disciples, "I have seen the Lord" (John 20:18 KJV). Mark 16:9 KJV corroborates, stating Jesus "appeared first to Mary Magdalene."
Matthew describes an appearance to Mary Magdalene and the "other Mary" as they were running from the tomb to deliver the angel's message to the disciples. "And as they went to tell his disciples, behold, Jesus met them, saying, All hail. And they came and held him by the feet, and worshipped him. Then said Jesus unto them, Be not afraid: go tell my brethren that they go into Galilee, and there shall they see me" (Matt 28:9-10 KJV).
These initial appearances, particularly to Mary Magdalene, further underscore the prominent role assigned to women in the resurrection narratives. While subsequent appearances to the disciples (e.g., on the road to Emmaus in Luke 24, to the assembled disciples excluding Thomas in Luke 24 and John 20) are crucial for the development of the post-resurrection story, they fall slightly beyond the scope of the immediate discovery events focused on here.
D. The Guards' Report and the Official Response (Matthew Account)
Parallel to the women reporting the angelic message and Jesus' appearance, Matthew recounts the reaction of the guards stationed at the tomb. "Now when they [the women] were going, behold, some of the watch came into the city, and shewed unto the chief priests all the things that were done" (Matt 28:11 KJV). This implies the guards witnessed the supernatural events (earthquake, angel) described earlier (Matt 28:2-4 KJV) and reported them to the authorities who had posted them.
The response of the leadership, according to Matthew, was not investigation but suppression. "And when they were assembled with the elders, and had taken counsel, they gave large money unto the soldiers, Saying, Say ye, His disciples came by night, and stole him away while we slept" (Matt 28:12-13 KJV). They even offered to protect the soldiers from any repercussions from Pilate should their dereliction of duty (sleeping on watch) become known: "And if this come to the governor's ears, we will persuade him, and secure you" (Matt 28:14 KJV). The soldiers accepted the bribe and disseminated the fabricated story. Matthew concludes this section by noting the effectiveness of this disinformation campaign: "So they took the money, and did as they were taught: and this saying is commonly reported among the Jews until this day" (Matt 28:15 KJV).
This episode serves as a direct counter-apologetic within Matthew's Gospel. Having established the official guarding of the tomb to prevent fraud [Matt 27:65-66], Matthew now explicitly identifies the origin of the competing narrative—the stolen body theory—attributing its creation and propagation directly to the Jewish authorities acting deliberately against the (supernatural) evidence provided by their own guards. By presenting this alleged cover-up, Matthew seeks to discredit the primary naturalistic explanation for the empty tomb that was apparently circulating within the Jewish community at the time he was writing.
VI. Conclusion
A. Synthesis of Events
The King James Version Gospel narratives, beginning immediately after Jesus' death on the cross, depict a sequence of events marked by urgency, devotion, and ultimately, astonishment. The burial, undertaken hastily before the Sabbath by Joseph of Arimathaea and Nicodemus, was performed with honor and care, utilizing a new, unused rock-hewn tomb sealed with a large stone. According to Matthew, official measures involving a seal and a guard were taken by Jesus' opponents to prevent any tampering or fraudulent claims. Despite these precautions, on the morning of the first day of the week, women arriving to complete burial rites found the stone removed and the tomb empty. Angelic messengers proclaimed that Jesus had risen from the dead, instructing the women to inform the disciples. Verification by Peter and John confirmed the tomb's emptiness and the peculiar, orderly state of the grave clothes. Initial appearances of the risen Christ, first to Mary Magdalene and other women, followed shortly thereafter. Matthew's account concludes this initial phase by describing the guards reporting the events to the chief priests, who allegedly bribed them to spread the false narrative that the disciples had stolen the body.
B. Convergence of History, Theology, and Narrative
The significance of these narrated events is amplified when viewed against the historical and theological backdrop of first-century Judea. The brutal reality and profound shame associated with Roman crucifixion 12 starkly contrast with the Christian claim of Jesus as the glorified Messiah, a paradox resolved only through the resurrection. Jewish burial customs, including the importance of prompt burial, the use of family tombs, and the practice of secondary burial 19, illuminate the specific choices made in Jesus' burial—the haste, the new tomb 21—and lend weight to the details reported. The diverse landscape of Jewish beliefs about the afterlife and resurrection 11 provides the context for understanding both the potential resonance and the radical challenge posed by the claim of an individual, bodily resurrection before the end times. Similarly, the varied Messianic expectations of the era 31 highlight the tension inherent in proclaiming a crucified man as Messiah and the necessity of the resurrection as divine vindication. The consistent role of female witnesses [all Gospels], the details of the grave clothes [John 20:6-7 KJV], and the explicit mention of the competing stolen body narrative [Matt 28:11-15 KJV] all contribute layers of meaning and address potential historical and apologetic questions.
C. Foundational Significance
The resurrection, as depicted in the KJV Gospels, stands as the pivotal event that validated Jesus' life and claims, transformed the despair of his followers into fervent proclamation, and launched the Christian movement. It is presented not merely as resuscitation but as the inauguration of a new creation and the ultimate triumph over sin and death. While the narrative itself acknowledges that the event was contested from the very beginning, with competing explanations offered [Matt 28:15 KJV], its proclamation became the non-negotiable core of early Christian identity and theology. The historical circumstances, theological currents, and specific narrative details surrounding the burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ, as conveyed in the King James Version, continue to be subjects of intense study and reflection, underscoring their enduring impact on religious history.
VII. Final Report Outline
I. Introduction
A. The Centrality of the Resurrection
B. Report Scope and Methodology
II. The Setting: Historical and Theological Landscape of First-Century Judea
A. Judea Under Roman Rule and the Reality of Crucifixion
Roman Occupation and Jewish Sentiment
Crucifixion as Roman Capital Punishment
B. Jewish Perspectives on Death, Burial, and the World Beyond
Burial Customs
Beliefs about Afterlife and Resurrection
C. Messianic Hopes and Expectations in the First Century
Diversity of Expectations
The Davidic King
Other Figures
Messianic Age
III. "He Made His Grave with the Rich": The Burial of Jesus (KJV Narrative)
A. Securing the Body and Sabbath Preparations
B. The Ministry of Joseph of Arimathaea and Nicodemus
C. The Act of Burial: Linen, Spices, and the New Tomb
IV. "Setting a Watch": The Sealing and Guarding of the Tomb (KJV Narrative - Matthew Account)
A. The Concerns of the Jewish Leadership
B. Pilate's Decree and the Roman Guard
V. "He is Risen": The Discovery and Proclamation of the Resurrection (KJV Narrative)
A. The First Day of the Week: The Women, the Stone, and the Angels (Including Table: Comparison of KJV Gospel Accounts)
B. The Empty Tomb Verified by Disciples
C. The Initial Appearances of the Risen Christ
D. The Guards' Report and the Official Response (Matthew Account)
VI. Conclusion
A. Synthesis of Events
B. Convergence of History, Theology, and Narrative
C. Foundational Significance
VII. Final Report Outline (Self-referential as requested)
Works cited
King James Version (KJV) - Version Information - BibleGateway.com, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.biblegateway.com/versions/King-James-Version-KJV-Bible/
King James Version KJV - Bible Study Tools, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.biblestudytools.com/kjv/
King James Bible Online, accessed April 10, 2025, https://thekingsbible.com/
The King James Version of the Bible - Project Gutenberg, accessed April 10, 2025, http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/10
BibleGateway.com: A searchable online Bible in over 150 versions and 50 languages., accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.biblegateway.com/
King James Version - The Holy Bible, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.o-bible.com/kjv.html
Bible: King James Version, accessed April 10, 2025, https://quod.lib.umich.edu/k/kjv/
Roman Crucifixion Methods Reveal the History of Crucifixion - Biblical Archaeology Society, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/crucifixion/roman-crucifixion-methods-reveal-the-history-of-crucifixion/
A Tomb in Jerusalem Reveals the History of Crucifixion and Roman Crucifixion Methods, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/crucifixion/a-tomb-in-jerusalem-reveals-the-history-of-crucifixion-and-roman-crucifixion-methods/
Jewish Funerary Customs, Practices and Rites in the Second Temple Period | Brill, accessed April 10, 2025, https://brill.com/display/title/7592
Afterlife in Judaism - Jewish Virtual Library, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/afterlife
Jesus wasn't the only man to be crucified. Here's the history behind this brutal practice., accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.livescience.com/65283-crucifixion-history.html
Crucifixion: The Exhumed Evidence - Israel My Glory, accessed April 10, 2025, https://israelmyglory.org/article/crucifixion-the-exhumed-evidence/
The Crucifixion | Religious Studies Center - BYU, accessed April 10, 2025, https://rsc.byu.edu/new-testament-history-culture-society/crucifixion
Crucifixion | Description, History, Punishment, & Jesus - Britannica, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/crucifixion-capital-punishment
Crucifixion - Wikipedia, accessed April 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucifixion
Crucifixion in the Roman World: Ideology Behind the Brutal Practice - Tragovi Prošlosti, accessed April 10, 2025, https://tragoviproslosti.eu/2023/05/09/crucifixion-in-the-roman-world-ideology-behind-the-brutal-practice/
Burial Sites & Tombs in Jerusalem of the Second Temple Period - Jewish Virtual Library, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/burial-sites-and-tombs-in-jerusalem-of-the-second-temple-period
Death & Bereavement in Judaism: Ancient Burial Practices - Jewish Virtual Library, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/ancient-burial-practices
Burial Practices in Roman Period Judea - Drive Thru History®: Adventures, accessed April 10, 2025, https://drivethruhistoryadventures.com/burial-practices-roman-period-judea/
Jesus and the Ossuaries: First-Century Jewish Burial Practices and the Lost Tomb of Jesus | Religious Studies Center, accessed April 10, 2025, https://rsc.byu.edu/behold-lamb-god/jesus-ossuaries-first-century-jewish-burial-practices-lost-tomb-jesus
Jewish Burial Customs and the Shroud - Digital Sindonological Lexicon, accessed April 10, 2025, https://leksykonsyndonologiczny.pl/en/specific-entries/jewish-burial-customs-and-the-shroud/
(PDF) Jewish Funerary Customs During the Second Temple Period, in the Light of the Excavations at the Jericho Necropolis - ResearchGate, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266022756_Jewish_Funerary_Customs_During_the_Second_Temple_Period_in_the_Light_of_the_Excavations_at_the_Jericho_Necropolis
Jewish eschatology - Wikipedia, accessed April 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_eschatology
Afterlife and Resurrection Beliefs in the Second Temple Period - Bible Interpretation, accessed April 10, 2025, https://bibleinterp.arizona.edu/articles/afterlife-and-resurrection-beliefs-second-temple-period
Afterlife beliefs of the second temple Jews : r/AcademicBiblical - Reddit, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AcademicBiblical/comments/xlirkz/afterlife_beliefs_of_the_second_temple_jews/
Second Temple Judaism - Wikipedia, accessed April 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Temple_Judaism
Jewish Resurrection of the Dead, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/jewish-resurrection-of-the-dead/
Resurrection from the Dead: Were Jews Influenced by Zoroastrianism?, accessed April 10, 2025, https://ehrmanblog.org/resurrection-from-the-dead-were-jews-influenced-by-zoroastrianism/
Jewish beliefs and Hell : r/religion - Reddit, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/religion/comments/1gth55k/jewish_beliefs_and_hell/
Jewish Messianic Hope - Tabletalk Magazine, accessed April 10, 2025, https://tabletalkmagazine.com/article/2022/02/jewish-messianic-hope/
Messianic Expectations of Second Temple Judaism - Pursuing Veritas, accessed April 10, 2025, https://pursuingveritas.com/2015/02/10/messianic-expectations-of-second-temple-judaism/
Six Messianic Expectations and One Messiah - CJF Ministries, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.cjfm.org/blog/2020/12/15/six-messianic-expectations-and-one-messiah/
Messiah in Judaism - Wikipedia, accessed April 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messiah_in_Judaism
Messianic Expectations in the Second Temple Period | Bible & Archaeology LIVE!, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-e-LtAmUYY4
Do Jewish People Expect Messiah to Resurrect? - Messianic Bible, accessed April 10, 2025, https://www.messianicbible.com/feature/messiah-ben-joseph/
THE TEMPORARY MESSIANIC KINGDOM IN SECOND TEMPLE JUDAISM AND THE DELAY OF THE PAROUSIA: PSALM 110:1 AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF EARLY - Evangelical Theological Society, accessed April 10, 2025, https://etsjets.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/files_JETS-PDFs_59_59-2_JETS_59-2_255-270_Stewart.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment