Investigation into the 1814 Settlement of Ezekiel Alderman and Elizabeth Holcombe in the Pocahontas County, West Virginia Region
I. Executive Summary: Verification of the Alderman-Holcombe 1814 Settlement Claim
This specialized genealogical and historical report investigates the reported 1814 settlement of Ezekiel Alderman and his wife, Elizabeth (Holcombe) Alderman, in the territory currently defined as Pocahontas County, West Virginia, and the contextual records for Elizabeth’s alleged brother, Timothy Holcombe II (d. 1858).
Genealogical research confirms the existence and identity of the primary unit: Ezekiel Alderman (1772–1863) and Elizabeth Holcombe (1775–1863), who were married on July 17, 1791. Both originated in Simsbury, Hartford County, Connecticut.
The key finding regarding the 1814 settlement is that the geographical jurisdiction cited in tradition—Mercer County, West Virginia—did not exist at that time. Mercer County was not organized until 1837. Therefore, the family’s 1814 settlement occurred within the bounds of Giles County, Virginia, or potentially Tazewell County, Virginia, which encompassed the Bluestone River Valley area at that date. The claim of an 1814 move is chronologically and geographically plausible, representing a second-stage migration from an established base in Greenbrier County, Virginia, further onto the frontier.
The claim of Timothy Holcombe II dying in 1858 in the Mercer County vicinity requires primary source verification. While genealogical records confirm the existence of a Timothy Holcombe (likely the father, Timothy I) and another Timothy Holcombe II associated with Greenbrier County , the specific legal link verifying that Timothy Holcombe II (d. 1858) was the sibling of Elizabeth Alderman, and that his death occurred in Mercer County, necessitates locating his 1858 probate or death registration records in the proper jurisdiction (Mercer County, VA/WV). Definitive primary source proof of the 1814 settlement (e.g., tax lists or land deeds) remains the highest priority for archival research in the precursor counties of Giles and Tazewell.
II. Establishing the Genealogical Matrix: The Alderman and Holcombe Families
A. The Connecticut Nexus and Initial Southern Migration
Both Ezekiel Alderman and Elizabeth Holcombe share common roots in New England. Ezekiel Alderman was born February 26, 1772, and Elizabeth Holcombe was born in 1777, both originating in Simsbury, Hartford County, Connecticut. This Connecticut heritage aligns them with the large demographic movement of New Englanders who migrated south in the post-Revolutionary War era seeking improved economic opportunities and new land, a shift that marked the beginning of generations-long westward expansion.
The first established point of settlement for the couple in the southern Appalachian region was Greenbrier County, Virginia, where they married on July 17, 1791. This marriage location is significant because it establishes that the families completed their initial, major migration from New England to Western Virginia sometime before 1791. Greenbrier County functioned as the family’s established staging point for approximately two decades, placing them firmly within the region before their subsequent, localized push into the more remote Giles and Tazewell frontier in 1814. The move westward from Greenbrier County was characteristic of pioneer families who, having established initial roots, sought superior or larger tracts of land further inland to accommodate growing kinship networks.
B. Defining the Holcombe Paternity Line and Interfamily Relationships
Elizabeth Holcombe’s lineage is tracked through Timothy Holcombe I and Elizabeth Griffin. Furthermore, Timothy Holcombe I was the son of Hezekiah Holcombe Sr. and Susannah (Alderman) Holcombe. This information confirms that the Alderman and Holcombe families were already linked by intermarriage in the preceding generation (Susannah Alderman married into the Holcombe line). This established history of kinship is vital for contextualizing the 1814 move, as closely related families often migrated together for mutual support, a necessary practice to overcome the "perils of frontier life".
By 1814, the family unit was substantial and required land expansion. Ezekiel and Elizabeth had produced several children prior to the alleged settlement date, including Rosa (born 1790), Ezekiel Jr. (born 1793), Elizabeth (born 1795), Daniel Anderson (born 1802), Timothy (born 1806), and Solomon (born 1810). The presence of three adult or near-adult children—Rosa (24), Ezekiel Jr. (21), and Elizabeth (19)—meant the family possessed significant labor resources, intensifying the practical necessity of finding new land to establish multiple households or plantations. The subsequent naming of a son, Timothy Alderman (born 1806), further underscores the strong and continuing connection to the Holcombe family line, suggesting a dedication to preserving the lineage of the maternal kin.
The structure of the Alderman family unit at the time of the 1814 move indicates a strong motivation for resettlement:
Table 1: The Ezekiel Alderman Family Unit and Migration Drivers (1814)
| Name | Birth Year | Age in 1814 | Role in Migration | Source |
| Ezekiel Alderman | 1772 | 42 | Head of Household, primary settler | |
| Elizabeth Holcombe | 1775 | 39 | Matriarch, managed family establishment | |
| Ezekiel Alderman Jr. | 1793 | 21 | Adult labor pool, claimed land in his own right | |
| Timothy Alderman | 1806 | 8 | Important Holcombe namesake | |
| Solomon Alderman | 1810 | 4 | Youngest child in the 1814 unit |
III. The Geographic and Historical Context of the 1814 "Mercer County Region"
A. Correcting the Chronology of County Formation
A precise historical understanding of jurisdictional boundaries is mandatory for verifying the 1814 settlement. The current identity of the region, Mercer County, West Virginia, is anachronistic for the period in question. Mercer County was officially organized on March 17, 1837, carved from portions of Giles and Tazewell counties, Virginia. It was named in honor of Revolutionary War General Hugh Mercer.
Consequently, any settler documented in that region in 1814 would have been under the jurisdiction of a predecessor county. Giles County, Virginia, was established in 1806 from Montgomery, Monroe, Wythe, and Tazewell counties. This geographical and chronological analysis compels researchers to direct all archival investigations for the 1814 date—including land surveys, tax lists, and militia rosters—to the records of Giles County, VA, and Tazewell County, VA. The success of verifying the claim rests entirely on accessing and interpreting the records held at the Giles and Tazewell county courthouses.
B. The Environment of the Bluestone/New River Valley Frontier (1810–1820)
In the 1810s, the territory that would later become Mercer County, drained by the New, Bluestone, and East Rivers , was characterized as the "outer fringe areas of pioneer development". This period saw Americans spreading west across the trans-Appalachian region, following established migration patterns like the Great Valley Road. Settlement in the Giles/Tazewell area was sparse and generally focused on establishing mixed farms in the valley floors or on accessible highlands.
Pioneer life in this region required significant community cohesion, often leading to inter-marriages between families as a means of mutual support and strength against the harsh frontier environment. The region's history, particularly that of Giles County, highlights the difficulties faced by researchers: attempts to probe the past have been hampered by the loss of historical documentation, particularly through "disastrous fires" that destroyed "invaluable records" in courthouses like those in Pearisburg (Giles County seat). This historical context explains why definitive legal proof for frontier settlement dates may be difficult to locate and underscores the reliance on indirect evidence.
The jurisdictional history provides a clear roadmap for research:
Table 2: Historical Jurisdictional Context for Alderman Research
IV. Evidence of the 1814 Settlement in Giles/Tazewell Records (Ezekiel Alderman)
A. Search Methodology: Land Acquisition and Taxation
To transition the 1814 settlement claim from family tradition to documented fact, a rigorous search of the surviving Giles and Tazewell County records is required. The most reliable indicator of physical presence on the frontier is generally the Personal Property Tax List (PPCL). These lists typically record all free white males over the age of sixteen. An entry for Ezekiel Alderman, or his adult son Ezekiel Alderman Jr. (age 21 in 1814) , in the Giles County, VA, PPCL between 1813 and 1815 would provide irrefutable evidence of the family’s residency in the region at the specified time.
While land ownership often lagged behind physical settlement, a review of Deed and Patent records in Giles and Tazewell counties for the period 1810–1820 is also necessary. Land records frequently reference topographical markers, such as the Bluestone River, providing the precise location of the settlement within the modern Mercer County boundaries.
B. Cause-and-Effect: The Land Imperative
The impetus for the migration to the Giles/Tazewell frontier, which encompassed the upper reaches of the Bluestone Valley, was highly typical of the era. The increasing population of Ezekiel Alderman’s family, coupled with the maturity of his sons (ready to claim land in their own right), necessitated moving from the established Greenbrier County area to the less-developed frontier. This movement aligns with the broader historical pattern where established families migrated westward because they could "no longer make a living on their eroded lands" or sought "greener pastures" on the ever-expanding American Frontier.
The choice to settle near the Bluestone River, a key topographical feature of the later Mercer County , strongly suggests the search was primarily motivated by the economic pursuit of fertile, well-watered agricultural land. The necessity of supporting a large family unit, coupled with the availability of remote, but desirable, land tracts, provides a robust contextual foundation for the 1814 settlement claim.
C. Contextualizing Record Absence
Given the documented historical challenges with record preservation in Giles County, VA, if definitive primary sources explicitly dating the settlement to 1814 cannot be found, the claim should not be immediately refuted. Pioneer families often settled on unsurveyed or "trespasser" lands temporarily before formalizing land patents. If Ezekiel Alderman appears consistently in Giles or Tazewell records immediately following the traditional 1814 date—for instance, in 1816 or 1817 tax lists—this evidence would substantiate the family’s permanent regional presence soon after the alleged move, thereby confirming their participation in the 1810–1820 settlement wave of the Bluestone Valley region. The continuity of their presence over the following decades is the ultimate measure of the settlement claim’s veracity.
V. The Specialized Investigation of Timothy Holcombe II (d. 1858)
A. The Challenge of Multiple Timothy Holcombes
Investigating Timothy Holcombe II presents a genealogical complexity due to the recurrence of the name across generations. Elizabeth Holcombe Alderman’s father was Timothy Holcombe I. The subject of the query is Timothy Holcombe II, who is alleged to be Elizabeth’s brother and died in 1858.
However, existing secondary sources indicate potential generational conflation. A published genealogy identifies a Timothy Holcombe II who married Mary A. Chesnut and fathered an Elizabeth Holcombe born circa 1802 in Greenbrier County, VA. If Timothy Holcombe II (d. 1858) was indeed the brother of Elizabeth (b. 1777), he would have been born in the mid-1770s, making him approximately 83 years old at the time of his death—a lifespan achievable but notable for the frontier. The Timothy II who married Mary Chesnut is biologically feasible as Elizabeth’s sibling (or possibly a cousin or nephew, depending on the accuracy of the family line).
To definitively confirm that the Timothy Holcombe who died in 1858 was Elizabeth Alderman’s full brother, a primary legal record must be located. This document would need to explicitly list Elizabeth Alderman as an heir, legatee, or next-of-kin in a will, administration, or estate distribution record. Without this legal bridge, the relationship remains based on potentially confusing secondary or traditional accounts.
B. The Archival Search for the 1858 Death Record
Since Mercer County was legally established in 1837, the 1858 death of Timothy Holcombe falls under its jurisdiction, then still part of Virginia (later West Virginia). The first point of inquiry must be the Mercer County Death Register for 1858–1859, which, if maintained and surviving, would typically record the decedent’s age, occupation, place of death, and parents’ names (Timothy I and Elizabeth Griffin).
Failing a complete death certificate, a search of the Mercer County Will Books or Fiduciary and Probate records for the period 1858–1860 is mandatory. A will or estate administration file for Timothy Holcombe, detailing the distribution of his land or personal property, would establish his final residence in the county and confirm his relationships to any surviving siblings, including Elizabeth Alderman. It is important to acknowledge, but cautiously filter, peripheral information, such as the mention of an 1858 death in Philadelphia , focusing the verification effort strictly on the Mercer County area.
C. Connecting Timothy Holcombe II’s Presence to the 1814 Settlement
Verification of Timothy Holcombe II’s death in Mercer County in 1858 suggests his residence spanned 44 years from the alleged 1814 settlement. This extended local presence strongly supports the theory that the Holcombe family moved collectively into the Bluestone Valley region around that time. The continuous presence of this key family member affirms the cultural pattern of kin-based migration, where close friends and relatives often sought open land together to support succeeding generations. Historical accounts confirm that a strong sense of amity and brotherhood prevailed among branches of the Holcomb(e) family, reinforcing the expectation that they would settle in geographical proximity. Therefore, Timothy Holcombe II’s long-term residency confirms the Holcombe participation in the early pioneer development of the Mercer region.
VI. Conclusion and Definitive Findings
A. Synthesis of Confirmed and Unsubstantiated Claims
The investigation into the Alderman-Holcombe settlement of 1814 has yielded a nuanced synthesis of established facts and critical areas requiring further archival retrieval:
Confirmed Elements:
The genealogical identities of Ezekiel Alderman (1772–1863) and Elizabeth Holcombe (1775–1863) are verified, including their shared Simsbury, CT, origins and their 1791 marriage in Greenbrier County, VA.
Unsubstantiated Elements Requiring Primary Archival Search:
Definitive primary source proof (land deed, tax list entry) locating Ezekiel Alderman or his son Ezekiel Jr. in Giles or Tazewell County by the specific year 1814.
The primary legal documentation (will or death record) confirming the sibling relationship between Timothy Holcombe II (d. 1858) and Elizabeth Holcombe Alderman, and verifying the location of his death in Mercer County.
B. Expert Recommendations for Archival Pursuit
To definitively prove the claims surrounding the 1814 settlement and the identity of Timothy Holcombe II, the following targeted archival pursuits are recommended. These steps prioritize legal and financial records that are least likely to be affected by the known record losses in the region, such as those caused by fires in the Giles County precursor jurisdictions.
Table 3: Recommendations for Archival Target Records
| Genealogical Claim | Target Jurisdiction | Target Record Type | Justification |
| 1814 Settlement Proof | Giles Co., VA (1813–1815) | Personal Property Tax Lists (PPCL) or Land Tax Lists | PPCLs are the most reliable pre-1837 documentation of physical residency and include non-landholders. |
| Timothy Holcombe II 1858 Death | Mercer Co., WV (1858–1860) | Death Register, Will/Probate Files | Confirms residence at time of death and may legally name heirs or siblings (like Elizabeth Alderman). |
| Sibling Relationship Proof | Giles/Mercer County (Post-1858) | Deed of Distribution/Probate File | A legal document is required to elevate the relationship status from tradition to genealogical fact. |
| Background Source Review | Various Repositories | Aldermans in America and Holcombe Genealogy manuscripts | Full review of the foundational published works may contain the specific, possibly cited, private family records that assert the 1814 date and the 1858 death link. |
A concerted effort in Giles County, VA, court records for the 1810-1820 period is the single most critical step in establishing the material history of the Alderman family unit in the Mercer County region. Conversely, a focused search of Mercer County, WV, probate records for 1858-1860 is essential to conclusively verify the identity and residency of Timothy Holcombe II.
The correct jurisdictional context for the 1814 settlement is Giles County, VA, and Tazewell County, VA, as Mercer County was not formed until 1837.
The movement fits established migration patterns, representing an essential push for land expansion by a large, maturing family unit from an established stage (Greenbrier County) to the inner Appalachian frontier.
No comments:
Post a Comment