Image Analysis 2

 Research this image and develop an hypothesis as to the reason for the variation in the results based on the best pedagogical teaching practices of 2025.

 

Research Websites and Files

 

(1) Analyze the attached image, focusing on the \"CIVICS & GOVERNMENT\" data. Separate the learning objectives into two groups: those marked \"DEFICIT\" (where the \"LOC\" score is lower than the \"NAT\" score) and those not marked \"DEFICIT\" (where \"LOC\" is equal to or greater than \"NAT\"). (2) Compare the cognitive tasks required for each group. Contrast the skills needed for the \"DEFICIT\" items (e.g., \"Draw a conclusion about the intent of the Constitution,\" \"Relate cause and effect of Constitutional provisions\") with the skills for the non-deficit items (e.g., \"Identify a power of the judicial branch,\" \"Analyze the reasons for a law\"). (3) Characterize the first group of tasks (DEFICIT) in terms of cognitive complexity (e.g., abstract synthesis, conceptual inference) versus the second group (e.g., factual recall, analysis of specific, concrete items). (4) Research the best pedagogical teaching practices for social science and civics in 2025. Focus on methodologies for teaching higher-order thinking, critical analysis, abstract reasoning, and conceptual understanding, such as inquiry-based learning, project-based civics, and conceptual synthesis. (5) Compare the findings from step (4) with the skill gap identified in steps (2) and (3). (6) Formulate a hypothesis explaining the variation. The hypothesis should propose a reason, based on 2025 pedagogical practices, why the \"Local\" (LOC) students struggle with abstract, synthetic tasks but meet or exceed the \"National\" (NAT) benchmark on more concrete, knowledge-based tasks. (7) Propose a "pedagogical gap" as the core of the hypothesis: speculate that the \"Local\" curriculum may be strong in direct instruction and factual knowledge transfer but may lack sufficient implementation of modern practices designed to build abstract reasoning and the ability to \"draw conclusions\" about complex, unstated concepts (like \"intent\" or \"evolution\").

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/174etAee3XUQv04Skrfg5apPyO0QceqkLisJdmOzJl5g/edit?usp=sharing