20 Different Logical Fallacies:
- Ad hominem: Attacking the person making the argument instead of the argument itself. (e.g., "You shouldn't listen to her, she's a terrible musician anyway.")
- Appeal to authority: Assuming something must be true because an authority figure says it is, regardless of evidence. (e.g., "The textbook says it, so it must be true.")
- Appeal to ignorance: Assuming something must be true because it can't be proven false (or vice versa). (e.g., "Nobody can prove ghosts don't exist, so they must be real.")
- Appeal to pity: Manipulating someone's emotions to get them to agree with you, rather than presenting logical reasons. (e.g., "If you don't give me extra time on this paper, I'll fail and my dreams will be crushed.")
- Appeal to popularity (bandwagon fallacy): Assuming something must be true because it's popular or widely believed. (e.g., "Everyone's doing it, so it must be good.")
- Circular argument: Restating your conclusion as evidence for your conclusion. (e.g., "She must be guilty because she's acting suspicious; her acting suspicious proves she's guilty.")
- False dilemma: Presenting only two options when there are actually more than two. (e.g., "Either you're with us or you're against us.")
- Genetic fallacy: Judging something based on its origin rather than its own merits. (e.g., "This movie must be bad because it was made by that terrible director.")
- Hasty generalization: Drawing a conclusion based on a small or unrepresentative sample. (e.g., "I saw three dogs barking today, so all dogs must be vicious.")
- Loaded question: Asking a question that already assumes a certain answer or puts the respondent in a difficult position. (e.g., "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?")
Bonus 10:
- Post hoc ergo propter hoc: Assuming that because one event happened after another, the first event must have caused the second. (e.g., "I ate ice cream and then got a stomachache, so the ice cream must have made me sick.")
- Red herring: Introducing irrelevant information to distract from the main point of the argument. (e.g., "Sure, we might have exceeded the budget, but the CEO has a really nice family.")
- Slippery slope: Assuming that if one thing happens, a series of increasingly negative events will inevitably follow. (e.g., "If we allow same-sex marriage, then polygamy and bestiality will be next.")
- Strawman fallacy: Misrepresenting or exaggerating someone's argument to make it easier to attack. (e.g., "You want to ban all guns? What about self-defense?")
- Tu quoque: Responding to an accusation by accusing the other person of doing the same thing. (e.g., "You say I'm being rude? Well, you're being even ruder!")
- Appeal to probability: Using vague or misleading statistics to make something seem more likely or unlikely than it is. (e.g., "You have a one-in-a-million chance of winning the lottery.")
- Existential fallacy: Assuming that because something exists, it must be good or desirable. (e.g., "Natural things are always better for you than synthetic things.")
- Fallacy of the undistributed middle: Assuming that because something is true for one part of a group, it must be true for all parts of the group. (e.g., "Some birds can fly, therefore all animals can fly.")
- Non-sequitur: Making a conclusion that doesn't logically follow from the premises. (e.g., "The sky is blue, therefore dinosaurs must have existed.")
- Begging the question: Assuming the truth of the conclusion in the process of trying to prove it. (e.g., "God must exist because the universe is so complex.")
Remember, understanding and recognizing these fallacies can help you evaluate arguments more critically and avoid making them yourself.
No comments:
Post a Comment