Brushy Mountain

 

Examining Brushy Mountain in the Sources

The sources provide a glimpse into the historical context of Brushy Mountain, a geographical feature that appears to hold significance in terms of land ownership and boundary demarcation. While the sources don't offer an in-depth description of the mountain itself, they do shed light on its role in defining property lines and its association with various individuals and families.

Brushy Mountain as a Boundary Marker: Similar to creeks, Brushy Mountain seems to have served as a prominent landmark for demarcating land ownership. Source, for example, lists "Most of Anthonys Creek & adjoins S. E. Corner Brushy Mountain" as a boundary description, indicating its use in defining property limits.
 
Land Transactions Involving Brushy Mountain: The sources record several land transactions that reference Brushy Mountain. Source mentions "Land, tree and clearing Yorkshire Brushy Mountain in Matthews – By Thomas – Matthew purchase of 180 acres – in Matthews 9.00 an acre lies in Pocahon—" suggesting that portions of Brushy Mountain were bought and sold, likely for timber harvesting or potential settlement.
 
Individuals and Families Associated with Brushy Mountain: The sources connect various individuals and families to land holdings on or near Brushy Mountain. Source names "Thomas Matthews" in relation to land on Brushy Mountain, while Source mentions "Anthony Creek," possibly referring to a family or individual with land holdings in the vicinity.
 
Brushy Mountain's Location and Context: The sources don't explicitly state the precise location of Brushy Mountain, but the frequent references to "Pocahontas" and "Greenbrier Co." suggest it lies within or near these areas in present-day West Virginia. It's important to note that multiple locations named "Brushy Mountain" exist in the Appalachian region, so further research would be needed to pinpoint the specific location referenced in these sources.
 
Significance of Brushy Mountain: The sources, though limited in their descriptions, imply that Brushy Mountain was more than just a geographical feature. Its use as a boundary marker and its association with land transactions suggest it held economic and social significance within the community.

The sources, while fragmented, offer valuable clues about the historical context of Brushy Mountain. They highlight its role in land ownership, its connection to specific individuals and families, and its likely location within a region known for its rugged terrain and complex history of settlement.