It can certainly be confusing when you are told that there is a law, but then you see or hear about things that seem to contradict it. There are a few reasons why this might happen, even with waste disposal and landfills.
Here's a breakdown of what might be happening with the Greenbrier situation and the landfill:
1. "Flow Control" Laws and Their Nuances:
The "law" you are likely referring to is something often called a flow control ordinance or law. These are very common at the local (county or city) level. The idea behind them is usually one (or more) of the following:
Protecting the Local Landfill: Counties invest a lot of money into building and managing their own landfills. Flow control laws can require that all trash generated within that county must go to the county's landfill. This ensures that the landfill gets a steady flow of waste, which is crucial for its financial viability (it needs the "tipping fees" that people or companies pay to dump trash).
Environment and Health: It can be easier for a county to monitor and regulate what goes into its own landfill rather than tracking waste shipped out to who-knows-where. This is for environmental and public health protection.
Planning and Forecasting: By controlling the waste flow, the county can better predict how quickly their landfill is filling up and plan for its future closure and the need for new waste solutions.
However, these laws are rarely absolute and often have exceptions.
2. Why Greenbrier Might Be "Taking It" (Even if a Law Exists):
This is the key part of your question. The statement "well, we are letting them now because the landfill is almost full" is the core explanation, and it highlights several common legal and practical reasons for exceptions:
Capacity or "Emergency" Exceptions: Most flow control laws are written to be practical. If a county's landfill reaches capacity, or if there's an emergency (like a disaster that creates a massive amount of waste, or a mechanical failure at the local landfill), the law might explicitly allow waste to be diverted elsewhere.
In your case, this seems to be exactly what's happening. The county official is saying that because the landfill is nearing its capacity limit, they have activated a policy or made a decision (which may be legally permitted under a specific clause of the flow control ordinance) to temporarily allow waste to be taken out of the county to another location, like a facility associated with Greenbrier. This is a common and responsible practice for waste management planning. If they didn't, and the landfill became completely full, they would have no way to dispose of the county's waste at all!
Intergovernmental Agreements (IGAs): Counties often enter into formal agreements with other nearby counties, cities, or even private regional solid waste authorities (like Greenbrier, if they manage waste regionally). These IGAs might establish that for a certain period, or under certain conditions (like the current landfill being nearly full), waste from one area can be sent to a landfill or waste management facility in another. The flow control ordinance would likely recognize and allow for such agreements.
The "Greenbrier" Factor: "Greenbrier" could be a few things:
A private company that manages waste and has a transfer station or landfill. If they are a regional provider, it's very common for them to accept waste from multiple surrounding counties.
A neighboring county or municipality.
A regional waste authority (a partnership between several counties).
If Greenbrier is a private or regional operator with its own permitted facility, they are likely legally allowed to accept waste from other areas as long as their own facility's permits allow it. The restriction you're thinking of applies to the people/companies originating the waste in your county, and that restriction has been lifted for the moment by the county itself.
3. "Really??? Wow!!!" - Your Reaction and Public Perception:
Your reaction is completely understandable. To a member of the public, it can seem hypocritical or arbitrary for a government to enforce a strict rule ("you can't take trash out!") and then suddenly change the rule.
This is a failure of communication, not necessarily of law. Here's why this information can be confusing:
Complexity of Environmental Law: Solid waste and environmental laws are incredibly complex. What seems like a simple rule on the surface almost always has layers of technical and legal exceptions.
Lack of Transparency: Officials may not do a good job of publicly explaining the full scope of the flow control laws, including the conditions under which exceptions can be made. This leaves people with a simplified, and therefore incorrect, understanding of the law.
Changes in Policy and Circumstances: In the world of waste management, circumstances change. A landfill filling up is a slow process, but once it gets close to capacity, it triggers a series of long-planned-for contingency measures, which the public might only see as sudden, arbitrary changes. The decision to "let them" wasn't likely a whim, but the execution of a pre-planned strategy.
In summary, there is a very high probability that everything you've seen and heard is perfectly legal. The apparent contradiction between the "law" (which you correctly understood as the general rule) and the "exception" (which is currently in place due to the landfill filling up) is a common feature of the complex systems that manage our everyday infrastructure.
No comments:
Post a Comment