Research the identified deficits. (1) List the deficits. (2) Research best practices to remediate. (3) Create a lesson plan for each deficit.(4) Explain rational for each.
Identifying Research Focus
An Evidence-Based Framework for Identifying and Remediating Student Learning Deficits
Part I: Foundational Deficits in Literacy
The acquisition of literacy is a cornerstone of academic and lifelong success. For a significant portion of the student population, however, the path to proficient reading and writing is impeded by neurodevelopmental learning disabilities. These challenges are not indicative of a student's intelligence or effort but stem from distinct differences in how the brain processes language.1
This section provides a detailed analysis of two primary literacy-based deficits: dyslexia and dysgraphia. It will establish the critical distinction between evidence-based instructional approaches, such as Structured Literacy, and other methodologies, setting a foundation for all subsequent remediation plans. A clear understanding of the unique characteristics of each deficit is paramount for accurate identification and the implementation of effective, targeted interventions.
Table 1: Comparative Overview of Foundational Literacy Deficits
1.1 Dyslexia: The Phonological Core Deficit
1.1.1 Defining Characteristics of Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a specific learning disability that is neurobiological in origin. It is characterized by difficulties with accurate and/or fluent word recognition and by poor spelling and decoding abilities.8 These difficulties typically result from a deficit in the phonological component of language that is often unexpected in relation to other cognitive abilities and the provision of effective classroom instruction.8 It is a language-based learning disability and is not caused by a lack of intelligence or a desire to learn.9
Primary Characteristics
The core of dyslexia lies in a cluster of specific language-based challenges. The three central features are difficulty with accurate word reading, poor spelling, and poor reading fluency.3 These observable struggles are manifestations of deeper, underlying deficits in language processing:
Phonological and Phonemic Awareness: The most fundamental deficit is a weakness in phonological awareness—the ability to recognize and manipulate the sound structure of spoken words. This extends to phonemic awareness, which is the more specific skill of identifying and manipulating individual sounds (phonemes) within words.2 A student may struggle to identify the first sound in the word "cat," blend the sounds /c/ /a/ /t/ together to form the word, or segment the word "ship" into its three distinct sounds /sh/ /i/ /p/. This deficit makes it profoundly difficult to grasp the alphabetic principle: the concept that letters and letter combinations represent the sounds of spoken language.9
Phonological Memory: Students with dyslexia often exhibit poor phonological working memory, which affects their ability to hold sound-based information in mind while they process it.3 This impacts their ability to remember the sequence of sounds in a word long enough to match them to letters for spelling or to blend them for reading.
Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN): Many individuals with dyslexia show difficulty with the rapid naming of familiar objects, colors, numbers, or letters of the alphabet.3 This challenge in quickly and automatically retrieving phonological information is strongly correlated with slow and effortful reading fluency.
Secondary Characteristics
The primary phonological deficit creates a cascade of secondary consequences that impact a student's broader academic performance and emotional well-being:
Poor Reading Comprehension: When a student must expend an enormous amount of cognitive energy on the laborious task of decoding each individual word, very few mental resources are left for the ultimate purpose of reading: comprehension.3 The student may successfully sound out every word in a sentence but have no understanding of what they just read.
Avoidance of Reading: Because reading is a frustrating, exhausting, and often embarrassing activity, students with dyslexia frequently develop strong avoidance behaviors.8 They may "forget" their book, act out during reading time, or make frequent trips to the bathroom or nurse's office to escape literacy-related tasks.11
Slow Reading Rate: Even after developing some decoding skills, students with dyslexia often read at a much slower pace than their peers. This lack of automaticity, or fluency, makes it difficult to keep up with academic demands, particularly on timed assignments and tests.3
It is crucial to address common misconceptions. Dyslexia is not a visual problem. The myth that students with dyslexia "read backwards" or primarily reverse letters is inaccurate.9 While letter reversals can occur in early writing for many children, persistent difficulty is tied to confusion with letter symbols for sounds, not a fundamental visual-perceptual deficit.9 The root of the disability is auditory and language-based.
Beyond academic metrics, behavioral patterns offer critical diagnostic information. A consistent pattern of avoidance behavior, such as feigning illness on days with a book report due or exhibiting sudden emotionality when asked to read aloud, should not be dismissed as mere defiance or laziness.11 This behavior often signals significant cognitive distress and is a protective mechanism against the repeated failure and anxiety associated with a task that is neurologically overwhelming for the student.6
Educators observing a pattern of avoidance specifically linked to literacy tasks should consider it a significant red flag for an underlying learning disability, prompting further investigation.
Furthermore, a hallmark of dyslexia is the marked discrepancy between a student's intellectual capacity and their performance on written tasks.11 A student may be highly articulate, possess a sophisticated vocabulary, and demonstrate strong critical thinking skills in class discussions, yet be unable to reflect that intelligence on paper.6
This occurs because the phonological deficit acts as a bottleneck, preventing the student from efficiently accessing or expressing their knowledge through the medium of written text. This "not living up to potential" observation is a key indicator.11 Consequently, assessment practices must be diversified to include oral reports and projects to gain an accurate measure of a student's understanding, and remediation must be viewed as removing a barrier to expression, not teaching the underlying concepts themselves.
1.1.2 Best Practices in Dyslexia Remediation: The Structured Literacy Approach
Decades of research have converged on a clear consensus: the most effective intervention for students with dyslexia is an approach known as Structured Literacy. This is not a single program but an umbrella term for instructional methods that are systematic, cumulative, explicit, and diagnostic in their delivery of literacy content.12 The Orton-Gillingham (O-G) approach is the original and best-known example of Structured Literacy.14
Core Principles of Orton-Gillingham and Structured Literacy
Effective remediation programs for dyslexia are built upon the following instructional principles:
Multisensory Instruction: This is the hallmark of the O-G approach. It involves the simultaneous use of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic-tactile pathways to reinforce learning.14 For example, a student might see the letter 'm' (visual), hear the teacher say its sound /m/ (auditory), say the sound /m/ themselves while feeling the vibration of their lips (kinesthetic), and trace the shape of the letter in a sand tray (tactile).17 This simultaneous engagement of multiple neural pathways creates stronger, more redundant memory traces for the connections between letters and sounds, which is particularly crucial for students whose primary language-learning pathway is weak.19 The purpose is not simply to make learning "fun" but to employ a deliberate cognitive strategy to build robust, cross-modal representations of language in the brain.
Systematic and Cumulative: Instruction follows a logical, well-defined sequence, moving from the simplest and most common language concepts to more complex ones.4 Each new skill builds directly upon previously mastered concepts, ensuring there are no gaps in a student's knowledge.21 For instance, students master closed syllables (e.g., cat, run) before being introduced to vowel-consonant-e syllables (e.g., cake, hope).
Direct and Explicit Instruction: All concepts are taught directly and unambiguously by the teacher.4 Nothing is left to inference or discovery. The teacher models the skill, provides guided practice, and ensures the student understands the "how" and "why" behind a reading or spelling rule.12 This is essential because students with dyslexia do not naturally absorb the patterns of language from exposure alone.
Diagnostic and Prescriptive: The instructor continuously monitors the student's progress through observation and formal/informal assessment.4 This diagnostic information is then used to prescribe the next step in instruction, ensuring the teaching is always tailored to the student's specific needs.22 The pace of instruction is governed by the student's mastery, not by a predetermined curriculum calendar.
Contrast with Balanced Literacy
It is essential to contrast Structured Literacy with the Balanced Literacy approach, a methodology still prevalent in many classrooms.23 Balanced Literacy often combines some phonics instruction with a whole-language philosophy that emphasizes using context, pictures, and sentence structure to guess unfamiliar words (a strategy known as three-cueing or MSV).15
For a student with dyslexia, this approach is fundamentally misaligned with their neurological needs. Encouraging a student with a phonological deficit to look away from the word and guess is counterproductive; it reinforces poor reading habits and actively discourages the development of the essential decoding skills they lack.15 While Balanced Literacy may be sufficient for the approximately 30% of students who learn to read with relative ease, it is inadequate and potentially harmful for the significant population of students who require explicit, systematic instruction to build the neural pathways for reading.15
The widespread adoption of Balanced Literacy can be seen as a primary systemic reason why many students with dyslexia fail to receive effective instruction in schools. A school's choice of a core reading curriculum is not a matter of pedagogical preference but an issue of educational equity; it can either serve as the primary intervention for its most vulnerable readers or act as the primary barrier to their success.
1.1.3 Sample Lesson Plan: Multisensory Decoding of CVCe Words (Orton-Gillingham Based)
Grade Level: 1-3 (or as diagnostically appropriate)
Deficit Addressed: Dyslexia (difficulty decoding words with long vowel patterns).
Objective: Following direct instruction, the student will be able to read and spell one-syllable words with the consonant-vowel-consonant-e (CVCe) pattern (e.g., "make," "ride," "hope") with 90% accuracy.
Materials:
Phonogram cards for previously learned consonants and short vowels.
New phonogram card: "a_e".
Sand or salt tray.
Small whiteboard and marker for each student.
List of CVC and CVCe word pairs (e.g., mad/made, rid/ride, hop/hope).
Decodable sentences featuring CVCe words.
Procedure (45 minutes):
Review (5 minutes - Auditory/Visual Drill):
Teacher quickly flashes previously mastered phonogram cards (e.g., 't', 's', 'a', 'i').
Students respond by saying the sound(s) associated with the letter (e.g., for 'a', they say "/a/"). This activates prior knowledge and builds automaticity.18
Introduce New Concept (10 minutes - Explicit/Multisensory):
Teacher writes the word "mad" on the board. The student reads it.
Teacher adds an 'e' to the end to make "made."
Explicit Instruction: The teacher states, "Today we are going to learn a new pattern. It is called the vowel-consonant-e pattern. When we see this pattern, the 'e' at the end is silent. It doesn't say a sound. But it has a special job. Its job is to reach over the one consonant and make the first vowel say its name, or its long sound. So, the 'a' in 'mad' says /a/, but in 'made', the 'e' makes the 'a' say its name, /ā/." This is often called the "Magic e" or "Bossy e" rule.
The teacher introduces the phonogram card "a_e" and explains that the line represents where the consonant goes.
Tactile/Kinesthetic Practice (10 minutes):
The teacher says the new sound-symbol association: "a-consonant-e says /ā/."
Students repeat the phrase.
Students trace the letters "a_e" in their sand tray with two fingers, saying aloud, "a, consonant, e, says /ā/".17 This simultaneous action links the visual shape, the auditory sound, and the kinesthetic-tactile feeling. Repeat three times.
Blending Drill (5 minutes - Word Reading/Decoding):
The teacher presents a list of CVCe words on the whiteboard (e.g., cake, bike, note, Pete).
For the first word, the teacher models how to decode: "I see a vowel, a consonant, and an 'e'. I know the 'e' is silent and the 'a' says its name, /ā/. /k/ /ā/ /k/. The word is cake."
Students then take turns reading the remaining words from the list, with teacher feedback.25
Spelling (10 minutes - Encoding/Simultaneous Oral Spelling):
The teacher dictates a CVCe word, e.g., "hope."
Students repeat the word aloud: "hope."
Students segment the sounds while tapping a finger for each sound: "/h/ /ō/ /p/."
Students write the word on their whiteboard while saying the letter names aloud: "h-o-p-e."
Students read the word they just wrote: "hope." This structured process reinforces the sound-symbol connections for spelling.25
Sentence Reading (5 minutes - Application and Fluency):
Students read a few short, controlled sentences that include the new CVCe pattern and previously learned words (e.g., "Kate will ride her bike to the lake."). This moves the skill from isolated words to connected text.18
1.1.4 Rationale for Lesson Plan
This lesson plan is meticulously designed based on the evidence-based principles of Structured Literacy, which research has repeatedly shown to be the most effective intervention for dyslexia.12
Explicit Instruction: The "Magic e" rule is taught directly and clearly, with no expectation that students will infer it from exposure.4 This directness is essential for students with dyslexia, who struggle to identify linguistic patterns independently.
Systematic and Cumulative Structure: The lesson introduces only one new concept (the CVCe pattern) and explicitly connects it to previously mastered knowledge (CVC words and short vowel sounds).4 This systematic progression ensures a solid foundation and prevents the cognitive overload that can occur when too many new concepts are introduced at once.
Multisensory Engagement: The lesson deliberately integrates visual (seeing letters and words), auditory (hearing and saying sounds), and kinesthetic-tactile (tracing in sand, finger tapping) learning channels.14 This multisensory approach is the cornerstone of Orton-Gillingham methodology, as it builds stronger, more resilient neural pathways for language processing, bypassing the student's area of weakness.20
Reciprocal Teaching of Decoding and Encoding: The lesson plan intentionally includes both a word reading (decoding) component and a spelling (encoding) component.25 This reinforces the understanding that reading and spelling are two sides of the same coin, strengthening the student's overall grasp of the alphabetic code.
Scaffolded Application: The lesson moves logically from the smallest unit of sound to isolated words and finally to connected text in the form of sentences.18 This scaffolding provides the necessary support for students to apply their newly learned skill in a meaningful context, which is the first step toward building reading fluency.
1.2 Dysgraphia: The Challenge of Written Expression
1.2.1 Defining Characteristics of Dysgraphia
Dysgraphia is a specific learning disability that affects a person's ability to produce written language.2 This difficulty can manifest in various ways, impacting handwriting (graphomotor skills), spelling (orthographic skills), and the ability to organize and express thoughts in writing (composition).6 It is essential to recognize that dysgraphia is not simply "messy handwriting" but a complex neurodevelopmental issue that can exist independently or co-occur with other learning disabilities like dyslexia.8
Key Symptoms and Manifestations
The hallmarks of dysgraphia can be observed in the physical act of writing and the quality of the written product:
Graphomotor Difficulties: Many students with dysgraphia struggle with the mechanics of handwriting. This includes poor letter formation, inconsistent sizing and spacing of letters, an awkward or painful pencil grip, and an unusually slow rate of writing.2 The physical act of writing is laborious and requires intense concentration.
Orthographic and Spelling Challenges: Students may have trouble remembering and retrieving the letter sequences required for spelling words correctly. They may also struggle with punctuation and capitalization rules.6
Difficulties with Written Expression: Perhaps the most significant impact is on the ability to translate thoughts into coherent written text. Students with dysgraphia often produce written work that is poorly organized, contains grammatical errors, and is syntactically simplistic.2 There is frequently a stark and frustrating discrepancy between the student's articulate spoken language and the sparse, disorganized nature of their written output.2
The most profound impact of dysgraphia is not the poor legibility of the writing itself, but the immense cognitive load that the physical act of transcription places on the student's working memory. For a typical writer, forming letters is an automatic process that consumes minimal cognitive resources. For a student with dysgraphia, each letter requires conscious effort, planning, and execution.6
This intense focus on the low-level mechanics of writing depletes the finite pool of working memory, leaving little to no cognitive capacity for higher-order writing processes such as organizing ideas, selecting appropriate vocabulary, constructing complex sentences, and monitoring for clarity and coherence.2 Consequently, the student's written work appears simplistic not because they lack sophisticated ideas, but because their cognitive resources are completely exhausted by the task of getting words onto the page. This reframes the problem from a purely motor issue to a critical working memory and cognitive load issue, which must be the primary target of intervention.
1.2.2 Best Practices in Dysgraphia Remediation: Integrating Motor Skills and Composition Strategies
Effective remediation for dysgraphia requires a dual-pronged approach that addresses both the mechanical barriers and the challenges with composition. The primary goal is to reduce the cognitive load of transcription to free up mental resources for higher-level thinking.
Accommodations to Bypass Mechanical Barriers: The most immediate and impactful support is to provide tools that bypass the handwriting deficit. This is not "cheating" but rather a necessary accommodation that allows the student to demonstrate their knowledge and develop their composition skills. Key accommodations include:
Keyboarding and Assistive Technology: Allowing the use of a computer or tablet for written assignments is crucial. For students who also struggle with spelling or typing, speech-to-text software can be transformative, allowing them to dictate their thoughts directly.7
Reducing Copying Demands: Providing copies of class notes or allowing students to photograph the board eliminates the need for laborious note-taking, which is often an impossible task for students with dysgraphia.7
Focusing on Content: Grading assignments based on the quality of ideas rather than on handwriting or spelling (for first drafts) reduces anxiety and encourages students to focus on expressing their thoughts.7
Explicit Instruction: Alongside accommodations, direct instruction is necessary to build skills.
Handwriting Instruction: For younger students, explicit, multisensory handwriting programs that teach letter formation in a systematic way can be beneficial.
Composition Strategies: Students with dysgraphia need explicit instruction in the writing process. This involves teaching them how to use tools that externalize the organizational demands of writing, such as graphic organizers, outlines, and sentence starters.29 Models like the "hamburger paragraph" provide a concrete, visual structure for students to follow, reducing the cognitive load of planning and organizing their thoughts.29
1.2.3 Sample Lesson Plan: Sentence Scaffolding with Assistive Technology
Grade Level: 3-5
Deficit Addressed: Dysgraphia (difficulty with written expression and organization).
Objective: Using a graphic organizer and speech-to-text software, the student will compose a well-structured paragraph of 3-5 sentences on a familiar topic, including a topic sentence, at least two supporting details, and a concluding sentence.
Materials:
Computer or tablet with speech-to-text software enabled (e.g., Google Docs Voice Typing, Microsoft Word Dictate).
A simple paragraph graphic organizer (e.g., a "hamburger" model or a four-square template labeled: Topic Sentence, Detail 1, Detail 2, Concluding Sentence).
A list of high-interest, familiar topics (e.g., "The Best Part of a Snow Day," "My Favorite Video Game," "Why Dogs Are Great Pets").
Procedure (45 minutes):
Topic Selection and Brainstorming (10 minutes):
The teacher presents the list of topics, and the student chooses one.
The teacher leads a purely verbal brainstorming session with the student. All ideas are spoken; no writing is required at this stage. The teacher can jot down key ideas on a separate board to reduce the student's cognitive load.
Organizing with a Graphic Organizer (10 minutes):
Using the graphic organizer, the teacher and student verbally plan the paragraph.
The teacher asks guiding questions: "What is the main thing you want to say about your topic? That will be our topic sentence." "What is one reason or example? That's our first detail."
The student verbalizes their sentences for each box of the organizer. The teacher may scribe the key ideas into the boxes for the student.
Modeling and Practice with Assistive Technology (5 minutes):
The teacher opens the speech-to-text software and models how to use it: activate the microphone, speak clearly and at a moderate pace, and make simple corrections using the keyboard if needed. The teacher models dictating one simple sentence.7
Composition via Dictation (15 minutes):
The student, referring to their completed graphic organizer, begins to compose their paragraph by dictating it into the software.
Scaffolding with Sentence Starters: The teacher provides explicit sentence starters to bridge the ideas. For example:
"For your first detail, you could start with 'One reason is...'"
"For your second detail, try 'Another example is...'"
"To wrap it up, you can say 'This shows why...'".29
The student dictates their sentences one at a time, with the teacher providing encouragement and technical support.
Review and Edit (5 minutes):
The student reads their completed, typed paragraph aloud. The software's read-aloud feature can also be used.
The student and teacher work together to make minor edits for clarity (e.g., adding a missing word, fixing a punctuation mark). The focus is on content, not mechanical perfection.
1.2.4 Rationale for Lesson Plan
This lesson is specifically engineered to address the core challenges of dysgraphia by strategically reducing cognitive load and providing robust structural support.
Bypassing the Primary Deficit: The central strategy of this lesson is the use of speech-to-text technology. This directly addresses the insight that the physical act of writing creates a cognitive bottleneck for students with dysgraphia.7 By removing the laborious task of handwriting and spelling, the student's finite working memory resources are freed up to be allocated to the higher-order cognitive tasks of idea generation, organization, and sentence formulation.
Externalizing Organization: The use of a graphic organizer and explicit sentence starters provides a clear, external scaffold for the writing process.29 Students with dysgraphia often struggle with the internal planning and sequencing required for composition. This lesson externalizes that structure, making the process visible, manageable, and less overwhelming.
Building Confidence and Reducing Avoidance: A primary emotional consequence of dysgraphia is intense frustration and anxiety related to writing, leading to avoidance.6 This lesson is designed to ensure a successful outcome. By leveraging technology and scaffolding, the student is able to produce a coherent, legible piece of writing that accurately reflects their ideas. This positive experience helps to build self-efficacy and demonstrates to the student that they are a capable writer, even if handwriting is a challenge.
Focus on Communication over Mechanics: The lesson prioritizes the primary goal of writing—communication of ideas. While mechanical skills are important, for a student with dysgraphia, an overemphasis on perfect handwriting and spelling can be paralyzing. This lesson strategically shifts the focus to content and clarity, allowing the student to develop their voice as a writer.
Part II: Foundational Deficits in Numeracy
While literacy deficits are widely recognized, challenges in acquiring mathematical skills can be equally debilitating to a student's academic progress and real-world functioning. A specific learning disability in mathematics, known as dyscalculia, affects a student's ability to develop a fundamental "number sense." This section will provide a detailed examination of dyscalculia, differentiating it from general math difficulties and outlining the evidence-based instructional approaches necessary for effective remediation.
2.1 Dyscalculia: The Deficit in Number Sense
2.1.1 Defining Characteristics of Dyscalculia
Dyscalculia is a specific and persistent learning disability that affects a person's ability to understand, learn, and perform math and number-based operations.30 It is a neurodevelopmental disorder, meaning it originates from differences in brain structure and function, and is not a reflection of a student's overall intelligence, motivation, or quality of instruction.32 It is sometimes colloquially referred to as "math dyslexia," an analogy that, while helpful in conveying its severity, can be misleading if taken too literally.30
The Core Deficit: A Weakness in "Number Sense"
At its heart, dyscalculia is a deficit in what is often called "number sense"—an intuitive, foundational understanding of numbers and their relationships.35 This core weakness manifests in several key areas:
Subitizing: A profound difficulty with subitizing, which is the ability to instantly recognize the quantity of a small group of objects without consciously counting them.34 While a typical five-year-old can subitize up to six objects, a child with dyscalculia may need to count a group of three or four dots one by one.34
Magnitude Comparison: A struggle to intuitively grasp the relative magnitude of numbers, such as quickly identifying which of two numbers is larger or smaller.34 This points to a less precise "mental number line."
Estimation: A significant challenge in approximating quantities, time, distance, or volume.30 A student with dyscalculia may be unable to reasonably estimate how long a 15-minute task will take or which of two containers holds more liquid.
Manifestations in the Classroom and Daily Life
This fundamental lack of number sense creates a wide range of observable difficulties in academic and real-world settings:
Difficulty with Basic Math Facts: Students with dyscalculia struggle immensely to memorize and automatically recall basic arithmetic facts, such as addition pairs or multiplication tables.6
Reliance on Immature Strategies: They often rely on finger counting long after their peers have moved on to more efficient mental strategies.35 When adding 8 + 5, they may start counting from one rather than "counting on" from eight.
Procedural and Conceptual Difficulties: There is often confusion with mathematical symbols (+, -, ×, ÷, <, >) and difficulty following multi-step procedures or algorithms.31 They may also struggle with core concepts like place value, fractions, and understanding word problems.6
Real-World Impact: The challenges extend beyond the classroom. Individuals with dyscalculia often have trouble telling time on an analog clock, managing money and making change, following sequential instructions in a recipe, or navigating using maps and directions.30
While the "math dyslexia" analogy can be useful for explaining the neurobiological basis of the disorder to parents and teachers, it can also be counterproductive for instruction. Dyslexia is primarily a deficit in the phonological processing of language sounds, whereas dyscalculia is a deficit in the processing of quantity and magnitude.34 Their underlying cognitive mechanisms are distinct. Therefore, applying remediation strategies that focus on the "language" of math (e.g., memorizing vocabulary terms) without first building the student's foundational, pre-symbolic understanding of quantity will be largely ineffective. Intervention must begin at a more fundamental level, connecting abstract numbers to concrete quantities.
Furthermore, the persistent struggle and failure associated with dyscalculia frequently lead to significant math anxiety.31 This anxiety is not merely a side effect; it becomes an exacerbating factor in a debilitating cycle. The process is as follows: a student with dyscalculia approaches a math task and struggles due to their core deficit in number sense. This struggle leads to frustration and repeated failure, which cultivates a strong sense of anxiety. Cognitive science research demonstrates that anxiety consumes critical working memory resources.
Since mathematical problem-solving is a highly working-memory-intensive activity, the anxiety produced by the dyscalculia further depletes the very cognitive resource needed to perform the task. This makes the math problem even more difficult, reinforcing the cycle of failure and intensifying the anxiety. Therefore, any effective intervention for dyscalculia must incorporate strategies to lower this affective filter, such as ensuring high rates of success, avoiding the pressure of timed tests, and providing tools like calculators to reduce the cognitive load of basic calculations.
2.1.2 Best Practices in Dyscalculia Remediation: From Concrete to Abstract
The most effective instructional approach for students with dyscalculia is one that systematically builds their conceptual understanding of numbers before moving to abstract procedures. The evidence strongly supports a Concrete-Representational-Abstract (CRA), sometimes called Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract (CPA), sequence of instruction.38 This approach is essential for students who lack an innate number sense and cannot intuitively grasp what abstract symbols represent.
Concrete Phase: This is the foundational stage. Instruction begins with the use of physical, hands-on manipulatives to represent numbers and mathematical operations. Students use objects like counters, base-ten blocks, number lines, or fraction tiles to physically build, combine, and separate quantities.39 This allows them to see, touch, and feel mathematical concepts, making them tangible and less abstract.
Representational (or Pictorial) Phase: Once a student demonstrates a solid understanding at the concrete level, the instructor guides them to the representational phase. Here, students learn to translate their work with physical objects into drawings or visual representations. For example, they might draw dots or tally marks to represent counters, or draw lines and squares to represent base-ten blocks.33 This phase acts as a critical bridge between the concrete object and the abstract symbol.
Abstract Phase: Only after mastery in the first two phases is the student moved to the abstract level. This is where they work with standard numerals and mathematical symbols (+, -, =).38 Because they have built a strong conceptual foundation, these symbols now have meaning anchored in concrete and pictorial experiences.
Additional High-Impact Strategies
Alongside the CRA framework, several other strategies are vital for supporting students with dyscalculia:
Break Down Problems: Complex or multi-step problems should be broken down into smaller, manageable steps to avoid overwhelming the student.40
Use Graph Paper: Providing graph paper can help students align numbers correctly in columns for multi-digit calculations, reducing errors caused by spatial organization difficulties.28
Explicit Vocabulary Instruction: The specific language of mathematics (e.g., sum, difference, product) should be taught explicitly, often using graphic organizers.28
Leverage Technology: The appropriate use of calculators can be a powerful accommodation. By offloading the cognitive burden of basic calculations (which a student with dyscalculia may never fully automatize), the calculator frees up working memory for the student to focus on higher-level problem-solving and reasoning.38
Ample Review and Practice: Students with dyscalculia require significant, structured review of previously learned concepts to build retention and move skills into long-term memory.33
2.1.3 Sample Lesson Plan: Using Manipulatives to Teach Place Value
Grade Level: 2-4 (or as diagnostically appropriate)
Deficit Addressed: Dyscalculia (difficulty understanding place value and the magnitude of two-digit numbers).
Objective: Following the CRA sequence, the student will be able to represent two-digit numbers using concrete base-ten blocks and pictorial representations, and correctly state the value of the tens and ones digits.
Materials:
Set of base-ten blocks (unit cubes and ten-rods).
A place value mat for each student, with a "Tens" column and a "Ones" column.
Whiteboard and marker for each student.
Worksheet with two-digit numbers and space for drawing representations.
Procedure (45 minutes):
Concrete Introduction (10 minutes):
The teacher introduces the manipulatives. "This small cube is a 'one.' We put it in the Ones house." (Places it in the Ones column on the mat). "This long rod is a 'ten.' Let's count the ones that make it up." (Counts 10 units next to the rod). "We put the tens in the Tens house."
The teacher models building a number, e.g., "32." "The number is thirty-two. That means I need three tens." (Places 3 rods in the Tens column). "And I need two ones." (Places 2 units in the Ones column). "Three tens and two ones make thirty-two."
Guided Practice - Concrete (15 minutes):
The teacher says a series of two-digit numbers (e.g., 15, 41, 28).
Students work in pairs or individually to build each number on their place value mat using the base-ten blocks.39
The teacher circulates, providing immediate feedback and asking clarifying questions: "Show me 28. How many tens did you use? How many ones? What is the value of the two tens? (20)."
Representational Transition (5 minutes):
The teacher models how to draw the blocks on the whiteboard. "When we can't use our blocks, we can draw them. We draw a simple line for a ten-rod and a small square or dot for a one-unit."
The teacher draws the representation for "32" next to the concrete model, explicitly linking the physical object to the drawing.40
Independent Practice - Representational (10 minutes):
Students are given a worksheet with several two-digit numbers.
For each number, they must draw the pictorial representation (lines for tens, squares for ones) in the correct columns.
Abstract Connection (5 minutes):
The teacher writes the abstract numeral "32" on the board and points to the concrete blocks and the drawing.
Explicit Connection: "When we see the number 32, we know it's not a 3 and a 2. The '3' is in the tens place, so it means three tens, which has a value of 30. The '2' is in the ones place, so it means two ones, which has a value of 2. Thirty and two make thirty-two." This direct connection is the final step in anchoring the abstract symbol to a concrete meaning.
2.1.4 Rationale for Lesson Plan
This lesson plan is grounded in the most effective, research-supported practices for teaching students with dyscalculia, with a primary focus on building foundational conceptual understanding.
Adherence to the CRA Sequence: The lesson strictly follows the Concrete-Representational-Abstract progression, which is considered the gold standard for building number sense in struggling learners.38 It begins with tangible objects, moves to pictures, and only then connects these to the abstract numerals. This systematic sequence ensures that the abstract symbols are imbued with meaning, rather than being memorized without comprehension.
Multisensory and Kinesthetic Learning: By requiring students to physically manipulate the base-ten blocks, the lesson incorporates tactile and kinesthetic learning channels.39 This reinforces the visual and auditory information provided by the teacher, creating a richer and more durable understanding of quantity and place value.
Systematic and Explicit Instruction: The lesson breaks down the complex and often confusing concept of place value into small, manageable steps.40 The teacher's role is direct and explicit, modeling each step, providing clear language, and offering immediate corrective feedback during guided practice.38 This prevents students from developing or practicing misconceptions, a critical component of effective remediation.33
Reduction of Cognitive Load: The lesson is intentionally focused on a single, foundational skill: representing quantity. It deliberately avoids asking for computation (e.g., adding or subtracting two-digit numbers) at this stage. This isolates the learning objective and prevents the student's working memory from becoming overloaded, which is a common barrier for learners with dyscalculia.33 By ensuring mastery of this prerequisite skill, the lesson sets the stage for future success with more complex operations.
Works cited
Common Disabilities : Faculty : Office of Disability Resources - University of Rochester, accessed October 16, 2025, https://www.rochester.edu/college/disability/faculty/common-disabilities.html
7 Learning Disabilities Every Psychology Professional Should Study | Walden University, accessed October 16, 2025, https://www.waldenu.edu/online-masters-programs/ms-in-psychology/resource/seven-learning-disabilities-every-psychology-professional-should-study
Characteristics and Signs of Dyslexia - Lake Oswego School District 7J, accessed October 16, 2025, https://www.losdschools.org/student-services/dyslexia-handbook/characteristics-and-signs-of-dyslexia
8 Research-Based Instructional Recommendations for Students with ..., accessed October 16, 2025, https://www.discoveryeducation.com/blog/teaching-and-learning/8-research-based-instructional-recommendations-for-students-with-signs-of-dyslexia/
What is the Orton-Gillingham Approach? | Academy of Orton-Gillingham Practitioners and Educators, accessed October 16, 2025, https://www.ortonacademy.org/resources/what-is-the-orton-gillingham-approach/
Learning disorders: Know the signs, how to help - Mayo Clinic, accessed October 16, 2025, https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/childrens-health/in-depth/learning-disorders/art-20046105
Kids Can't Wait: Strategies to Support Struggling Readers - Yale Dyslexia, accessed October 16, 2025, http://dyslexia.yale.edu/resources/educators/instruction/kids-cant-wait-strategies-to-support-struggling-readers/
Dyslexia - Texas Education Agency, accessed October 16, 2025, https://tea.texas.gov/academics/special-student-populations/special-education/dyslexia.pdf
Dyslexia Basics, accessed October 16, 2025, https://dyslexiaida.org/dyslexia-basics/
www.losdschools.org, accessed October 16, 2025, https://www.losdschools.org/student-services/dyslexia-handbook/characteristics-and-signs-of-dyslexia#:~:text=Dyslexia%20has%20three%20central%20features,person%2C%20from%20mild%20to%20severe.
Tips for Recognizing Learning Disorders in the Classroom - Child Mind Institute, accessed October 16, 2025, https://childmind.org/article/recognizing-learning-disorders-in-the-classroom/
Structured Literacy vs. Balanced Literacy: Where Orton-Gillingham Fits, accessed October 16, 2025, https://www.orton-gillingham.com/structured-literacy-vs-balanced-literacy/
Structured Literacy and Orton Gillingham - Nessy, accessed October 16, 2025, https://www.nessy.com/en-us/dyslexia-explained/how-to-help-dyslexia/structured-literacy-and-orton-gillingham
Orton-Gillingham - Wikipedia, accessed October 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orton-Gillingham
Structured vs. Balanced Literacy: Why It Matters When Learning to Decode - McLean School, accessed October 16, 2025, https://www.mcleanschool.org/structured-versus-balanced-literacy/
The Orton-Gillingham Approach, accessed October 16, 2025, https://www.orton-gillingham.com/approach/
Orton–Gillingham: What You Need to Know | Reading Rockets, accessed October 16, 2025, https://www.readingrockets.org/topics/dyslexia/articles/orton-gillingham-what-you-need-know
What is Orton-Gillingham? - Pride Reading Program, accessed October 16, 2025, https://pridereadingprogram.com/what-is-orton-gillingham/
Introducing an Orton-Gillingham Curriculum in the Classroom - IMSE - Journal, accessed October 16, 2025, https://journal.imse.com/introducing-orton-gillingham-curriculum/
What Is The Orton-Gillingham Method? - Reed Charitable Foundation, accessed October 16, 2025, https://reedcharitablefoundation.org/what-is-the-orton-gillingham-method/
The Orton-Gillingham Approach to Reading and Spelling - All About Learning Press, accessed October 16, 2025, https://www.allaboutlearningpress.com/blog/orton-gillingham/
Understanding the Orton Gillingham Approach: A Guide for Parents and Teachers, accessed October 16, 2025, https://ortongillinghamonlineacademy.com/blog/understanding-the-orton-gillingham-approach/
The Science of Reading vs. Balanced Literacy: Why Evidence-Based Instruction Wins Out, accessed October 16, 2025, https://www.lexialearning.com/blog/the-science-of-reading-vs-balanced-literacy
What the Balanced Literacy Approach Gets Wrong About Teaching Kids to Read, accessed October 16, 2025, https://ignite-reading.com/insights/balanced-literacy-approach-teaching-kids-to-read/
O-G for General Education - Orton-Gillingham, accessed October 16, 2025, https://www.orton-gillingham.com/general-education/
The Ultimate Guide to Reading Programs for Dyslexics - Structured Literacy, accessed October 16, 2025, https://pridereadingprogram.com/best-reading-program-dyslexics/
Common Characteristics of Dyslexia - IDA Tennessee, accessed October 16, 2025, https://tn.dyslexiaida.org/common-signs-of-dyslexia/
Strategies to Support Students with Math Learning Disabilities - Frax, accessed October 16, 2025, https://frax.explorelearning.com/resources/insights/dyscalculia-dysgraphia-learning-strategies
Help for Executive Functions | Child Mind Institute, accessed October 16, 2025, https://childmind.org/article/helping-kids-who-struggle-with-executive-functions/
Dyscalculia Explained - Common signs and symptoms - Center School, accessed October 16, 2025, https://www.centerschoolpa.org/apps/news/article/1831811
Dyscalculia: What It Is, Causes, Symptoms & Treatment - Cleveland Clinic, accessed October 16, 2025, https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/23949-dyscalculia
Dyscalculia: Symptoms and Causes - LD Network, accessed October 16, 2025, https://ldnetwork.org/learning-difficulty/dyscalculia-a-learning-difficulty-affecting-the-development-of-mathematical-ability/
What are strategies for teaching a student with a math-related learning disability? | AccessComputing - University of Washington, accessed October 16, 2025, https://www.washington.edu/accesscomputing/what-are-strategies-teaching-student-math-related-learning-disability
Dyscalculia - Wikipedia, accessed October 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyscalculia
10 Common Signs of Dyscalculia - Touch Math, accessed October 16, 2025, https://touchmath.com/10-common-signs-of-dyscalculia/
Dyscalculia Characteristics, Symptoms and Signs - Edublox Online Tutor, accessed October 16, 2025, https://www.edubloxtutor.com/dyscalculia-characteristics-symptoms-signs/
Learning and Cognitive Disorders - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed October 16, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4539272/
How to Effectively Support Students with Dyscalculia - Spark - Bethel ..., accessed October 16, 2025, https://spark.bethel.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1869&context=etd
Unlocking Mathematical Potential at Mclean School: Strategies for Supporting Students with Dyscalculia, accessed October 16, 2025, https://www.mcleanschool.org/unlocking-mathematical-potential-at-mclean-school-strategies-for-supporting-students-with-dyscalculia/
No comments:
Post a Comment