The Linguistics of Word Origins, Evolution, and Meaning
I. Introduction: The Dynamic Nature of Words
A. The Ever-Evolving Lexicon: An Overview of Word Origins, Evolution, and Meaning.
Language is not a static, immutable entity but rather a dynamic and perpetually evolving system.1 This inherent dynamism is most readily observed in its lexicon—the collection of words that form the building blocks of communication. Words are born, they mature, they adapt, and sometimes they fade into obsolescence. The study of these processes—word origins (etymology), their structural and phonetic transformations, and the often-surprising shifts in their meanings (semantic change)—constitutes a central and fascinating domain within linguistic inquiry. Investigating these phenomena offers profound insights not only into the mechanics of language itself but also into the broader tapestry of human history, cultural development, cognitive processes, and societal transformations.1 The journey of a word through time is often a reflection of the journey of the speech community that uses it.
The intricate ways in which words change are not isolated events. Changes at one level of linguistic structure, such as alterations in pronunciation (phonological change), can exert influence on other aspects, including a word's perceived meaning or its grammatical function. For instance, if phonological shifts cause two previously distinct words to become homophones (sounding alike), this can create ambiguity. Such ambiguity might lead to one of the words falling into disuse or, alternatively, acquiring a new, distinct meaning to differentiate it from its homophonic counterpart, a phenomenon related to the avoidance of homonymic conflict.5 These modifications are rarely purely internal to the language system; they are frequently intertwined with broader societal shifts, cultural exchanges, and the cognitive ways in which humans categorize and understand their world. Therefore, a holistic and integrated approach is essential to fully comprehend the complex life cycle of words. The study of etymology, for example, inherently involves examining the evolution of both sound and meaning units within words across time.6 Linguistic evolution itself is a multifaceted process encompassing phonological, grammatical, lexical, semantic, and syntactic changes, all of which can interact and influence one another.1
B. Interdisciplinary Approaches to a Multifaceted Phenomenon.
The exploration of word origins, their subsequent evolution, and the shifts in their meanings is an inherently interdisciplinary endeavor. It necessitates drawing upon the theoretical frameworks and methodological tools of a diverse array of linguistic subfields and related disciplines. Historical linguistics provides the overarching diachronic (time-based) perspective, tracing the development of languages and words through centuries.6 Etymology, as a core component, focuses specifically on the life history of individual words.6 Semantics and pragmatics delve into the nature of meaning itself—how it is encoded, interpreted, and used in context.8 Sociolinguistics illuminates the crucial role of social factors, cultural norms, and community dynamics in driving and shaping language change.10 Psycholinguistics investigates the cognitive processes underlying language comprehension, production, and acquisition, including how meanings are stored, accessed, and processed in the human mind.12 Philology, with its meticulous examination of historical texts, offers invaluable data and context for understanding past language states and word usages.14 More recently, computational linguistics and Natural Language Processing (NLP) have introduced powerful new methods for analyzing vast quantities of linguistic data, modeling language change, and uncovering patterns that might be invisible to traditional methods.15 Each ofthese disciplines contributes unique perspectives and analytical techniques, and their convergence allows for a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the multifaceted journey of words.
The relationship between traditional linguistic methods and these newer computational approaches is increasingly symbiotic. Traditional scholarship, particularly in historical linguistics and philology, laid the essential groundwork by developing methodologies for comparative analysis, textual criticism, and the qualitative study of language change.6 Computational linguistics does not supplant these established methods but rather builds upon them, offering ways to analyze linguistic phenomena at an unprecedented scale and with remarkable speed.17 For instance, computational models designed to detect semantic change over time often draw upon linguistic theories of change, such as the roles of metaphor and metonymy, and are frequently validated against historical data meticulously curated through philological research.19 This synergy represents an evolution in methodology itself, where the strengths of both qualitative, in-depth analysis and quantitative, large-scale computation are harnessed to deepen our understanding of the dynamic nature of words.
II. The Genesis of Words: Etymology and Mechanisms of Word Formation
A. Unearthing Origins: The Science of Etymology.
1. Defining Etymology: The Study of Word History.
Etymology, as a specialized subfield within linguistics, is dedicated to the scientific study of the origin and historical development of words. It meticulously traces the trajectory of words, chronicling changes in their forms (phonological and morphological) and meanings across time.6 This discipline is intrinsically linked with historical linguistics, which provides the broader framework for understanding language change, and philology, which offers methods for analyzing historical texts where earlier word forms and uses are documented.6 The very term "etymology" offers a window into its core pursuit. It is derived from the Greek etymon, meaning "true sense" or "literal meaning of a word according to its origin," and -logia, meaning "study of".6 This etymological heritage underscores the field's fundamental aim: to uncover the authentic, original meaning and the complete historical narrative of each word.
2. Core Concepts in Etymology.
Several core concepts are fundamental to etymological research:
Etymon: This term refers to the predicate, stem, root, or original word or morpheme from which a later word or morpheme is derived.6 For instance, the Latin word candidus, meaning 'white', serves as the etymon for the English word candid.6 The relationship is not always transparent; English place names like Winchester and Gloucester share a suffix originating from the Latin castrum ('fort'), though the connection is less obvious.6
Cognates: Lexical cognates are sets of words found in different languages (or sometimes within the same language as "doublets" or "etymological twins") that have been inherited through direct descent from a common etymological ancestor in a shared parent language.6 An example is the Modern English word 'heat,' which is a reflex of the Old English word hǣtu.6 Doublets, such as English shirt (native) and skirt (from Old Norse), share the same Indo-European root but entered English through different pathways and at different times, resulting in distinct forms and meanings.
Root: A root is the ultimate source morpheme from which a set of related words within a single language is derived, without crossing any language barriers.6 These related words are often formed through morphological processes. For example, the English words unhappy, happily, and unhappily are all derivatives of the root word happy.6
3. Methodological Toolkit of the Etymologist.
Etymologists employ a range of sophisticated methods to investigate word origins:
Philological Research: This involves the careful examination of older texts, manuscripts, and inscriptions to trace the historical changes in a word's form and meaning.6 Philologists meticulously analyze historical documents, considering script, orthography, and textual context to reconstruct past linguistic states.14
Dialectological Data: The study of variations in a word's form or meaning across different dialects of a language can yield crucial clues about its earlier history and evolution.6 Regional variations often preserve older features that have been lost in standard varieties.
The Comparative Method: This is a cornerstone of historical linguistics and etymology. It involves the systematic comparison of related languages to identify regular sound correspondences and shared vocabulary. This allows linguists to reconstruct features of the unattested common ancestor language (proto-language) and to distinguish words that were inherited from this ancestor from those that were borrowed at a later stage.6
Study of Semantic Change: Etymologists must often formulate hypotheses about how and why the meanings of particular words have shifted over time. These hypotheses are then tested against general knowledge of semantic shifts and by observing whether similar types of changes have occurred in other words or other languages.6
The field of etymology has undergone a significant transformation. Once sometimes characterized by speculative interpretations or "witty wordplay" 6, it has evolved into a more rigorously scientific discipline. This evolution was particularly propelled by the advancements in historical linguistics during the 18th and 19th centuries, which introduced systematic methodologies like the comparative method.6 This shift has allowed for more reliable and evidence-based reconstructions of word histories, moving beyond folk etymologies or superficial resemblances.23 The establishment of the Linguistic Society of America in 1924, with its focus on the scientific study of language, further solidified this rigorous approach.24
B. The Birth of New Words: Processes of Lexical Innovation.
Words are not static entities; new ones are constantly being created to meet the evolving communicative needs of a speech community. These lexical innovations arise through a limited number of fundamental mechanisms.6 Understanding these processes is key to comprehending how a language's vocabulary expands and adapts over time.
1. Primary Mechanisms of Word Formation.
Languages employ a diverse array of strategies to form new words from existing linguistic material. These mechanisms are often highly productive and reflect both systematic rules and creative linguistic play. The primary processes include 23:
Compounding: This involves combining two or more existing root morphemes (which can often be free words themselves) to create a new word with a distinct meaning. Examples include blackboard (black + board), sunrise (sun + rise), and doghouse (dog + house).23
Derivation (including Affixation): New words are created by modifying a root or base word, typically by adding affixes—prefixes (e.g., un- in unhappy), suffixes (e.g., -ness in happiness), or, less commonly in English, infixes. This process often changes the word's part of speech or its specific meaning.6
Blending: This creative process merges parts of two or more existing words to form a new word. The blend typically combines the sounds and meanings of its source words. Classic examples include smog (smoke + fog) and brunch (breakfast + lunch).23
Clipping: Clipping involves shortening a longer word by removing one or more syllables, while the clipped form retains the meaning of the original. Examples are prof (from professor), gym (from gymnasium), and phone (from telephone).23
Acronyms and Initialisms: Acronyms are words formed from the initial letters of a phrase and pronounced as a single word (e.g., NASA from National Aeronautics and Space Administration; scuba from self-contained underwater breathing apparatus). Initialisms are similar but are pronounced as a sequence of letters (e.g., FBI from Federal Bureau of Investigation).23
Back-formation: This process creates a new word (often a verb) by mistakenly removing what appears to be an affix from an existing word (often a noun). For example, the verb edit was back-formed from editor, and liaise from liaison.25
Conversion (Zero Derivation): A word changes its grammatical category (part of speech) without any change to its form. For instance, the noun email can be converted into the verb to email, and the noun google became the verb to google.25
Reanalysis and Folk Etymology: Reanalysis occurs when speakers reinterpret the morphological structure of a word, sometimes leading to new forms. For example, hamburger (originally Hamburger steak, meaning 'steak in the Hamburg style') was reanalyzed as ham + burger, paving the way for cheeseburger.23 Folk etymology is a specific type of reanalysis where an unfamiliar word is reshaped to resemble more familiar morphemes, often based on a mistaken understanding of its origin (e.g., bridegroom from Old English brydguma, where guma 'man' was reinterpreted as groom).6
Analogy: New words are often formed by analogy with existing words or patterns. If a particular morphological pattern is productive, speakers may extend it to create new forms. The creation of cheeseburger based on the reanalyzed hamburger is an example.23
Novel Creation (Coinage): Occasionally, words are created entirely from scratch, without any direct etymological connection to existing morphemes. These are true coinages. Examples include blimp, quark, and brand names like Kodak.23 Some coinages may exhibit sound symbolism, where the sounds of the word are intended to evoke its meaning (e.g., bling).23
Creative Respelling: Sometimes words are formed by intentionally altering the spelling of an existing word, often for branding or stylistic effect, such as Mr. Kleen or thru for through.23
The following table provides a summary of these key mechanisms:
Table 1: Key Mechanisms of Word Formation
2. The Influx of Neologisms and the Role of Borrowing.
Beyond these internal mechanisms of word formation, languages also enrich their lexicons through the adoption of entirely new terms, known as neologisms or coinages, and through the process of borrowing words from other languages.
Neologisms are newly formed words, terms, or phrases that are in the process of gaining, or have already achieved, popular or institutional recognition and are becoming accepted into the mainstream language.27 They are a direct manifestation of lexical innovation and are frequently spurred by changes in culture, society, and particularly technology.28 The path to acceptance for a neologism can be seen as a continuum: a protologism is a new term used by a very small group, a prelogism is gaining wider usage but is not yet mainstream, and a neologism has achieved broader recognition.28 The verb "to google," which emerged from the proper noun "Google" due to the search engine's ubiquity, is a prime example of a neologism that quickly became standard.26
Borrowing, or the adoption of loanwords, is another major avenue for lexical expansion.6 Throughout history, languages have readily incorporated words from other linguistic systems due to cultural contact, trade, conquest, or the prestige associated with another language. English, for instance, has an exceptionally rich vocabulary due to extensive borrowing from Latin, French, Old Norse, and numerous other languages worldwide.31
The diverse array of word formation processes and the continuous influx of neologisms and borrowings are not arbitrary phenomena. They reflect fundamental cognitive processes, such as analogy, categorization, and the ability to blend concepts, as well as the unceasing communicative imperative to name new experiences, objects, and ideas.29 When a society encounters a new technology, a new cultural trend, or a novel concept, language users must find ways to refer to it. Often, the most cognitively efficient path is to adapt existing lexical material through processes like metaphor or metonymy, or to combine existing elements in novel ways, rather than creating entirely new, unrelated forms. This drive for expressive power and referential clarity ensures that the lexicon remains a dynamic and responsive component of language.
III. Linguistic Evolution: The Broader Currents of Language Change
A. Defining Linguistic Evolution and its Pervasiveness.
Linguistic evolution refers to the continuous process by which languages transform over time. This phenomenon is not random but is shaped by a confluence of historical events, cultural shifts, and socioeconomic changes within a speech community.1 Much like biological evolution, languages adapt, diversify, and sometimes even become extinct. This inherent mutability is a fundamental characteristic of all living languages, driven by factors such as generational turnover, migration patterns, the advent of new technologies, and intercultural exchanges.2 No language remains static; it is in a constant state of becoming.
B. Dimensions of Change: Phonological, Grammatical, Lexical, and Syntactic Transformations.
Linguistic evolution manifests across all levels of language structure. The primary dimensions of these transformations include 2:
Phonological Changes: These involve alterations in the sound system of a language. Pronunciations of vowels and consonants can shift over time, leading to changes in a language's overall phonetic and phonemic inventory. A notable example is the Great Vowel Shift in English (c. 1400-1700), which systematically altered the pronunciation of long vowels.31
Grammatical Changes: The grammatical structure of a language also evolves. This can include modifications in morphological rules (e.g., the way words are inflected for tense, number, or case) and word order. For instance, Old English had a much richer system of inflectional endings than Modern English; over centuries, many of these endings were lost, and word order became more fixed to convey grammatical relations.31
Lexical Changes: This dimension concerns the vocabulary of a language. As discussed in Section II, new words are constantly being created through various formation processes or borrowed from other languages, while other words may fall into disuse and become archaic or obsolete.
Syntactic Changes: These are modifications in the rules governing sentence structure. This can involve changes in how phrases and clauses are constructed, the types of grammatical constructions that are permissible, or the typical order of elements within a sentence.
Semantic Changes: While listed as a dimension of linguistic evolution in some sources 2, the evolution of word meaning is a particularly complex and multifaceted area that will be explored in extensive detail in Section IV.
C. Factors Contributing to Linguistic Evolution.
A variety of interconnected factors drive the processes of linguistic evolution 2:
Contact and Interaction: When speakers of different languages or dialects come into contact through migration, trade, conquest, or colonization, their languages often influence one another. This can lead to the borrowing of vocabulary, grammatical structures, and even phonological features. The Norman Conquest of England in 1066, for example, led to a massive influx of Norman French vocabulary into English, profoundly reshaping its lexicon.2
Social and Cultural Influences: Language is deeply embedded in society and culture. As social norms, values, beliefs, and cultural practices evolve, language adapts to reflect these changes.4 For example, shifts in societal attitudes towards certain groups can lead to changes in the terminology used to refer to them, often involving processes like pejoration or amelioration of existing terms.
Technological Advances: The development of new technologies frequently necessitates the creation of new terms to describe novel concepts, objects, and processes.33 The digital revolution, for instance, has introduced a plethora of new words into English, such as internet, software, email, selfie, and blog.
Generational Differences: Younger generations are often at the forefront of linguistic innovation. They may introduce new slang, modify pronunciations, or adopt novel grammatical constructions. While some of these innovations may be ephemeral, others can gain wider acceptance and eventually become standard features of the language.
Internal Linguistic Pressures: Sometimes, changes arise from within the language system itself, driven by principles such as ease of articulation (leading to sound changes), the desire for clarity (leading to grammatical regularization), or the avoidance of ambiguity.
It is crucial to recognize that linguistic change is not a uniform or monolithic process. Different components of a language—its sound system, grammar, vocabulary, and semantics—evolve at varying rates and are influenced by different combinations of these internal and external factors. Lexical change, encompassing the introduction of new words and shifts in the meanings of existing ones, appears to be particularly responsive to sociocultural and technological pressures. The rapid adoption of vocabulary related to new technologies or social trends illustrates this responsiveness. In contrast, fundamental grammatical structures may change more slowly, though processes like grammaticalization (where lexical words evolve into grammatical function words) demonstrate that grammar is also subject to profound long-term evolution. A comprehensive model of linguistic evolution must therefore account for this inherent variability and the complex interplay of diverse causal factors.
IV. The Shifting Sands of Meaning: Understanding Semantic Change
A. Semantics and the Fluidity of Meaning.
Semantics is the sub-discipline of linguistics dedicated to the systematic study of meaning. It seeks to understand what meaning is as an element of language, how it is constructed by linguistic forms (words, phrases, sentences), and how it is interpreted, sometimes obscured, and constantly negotiated by speakers and listeners within a speech community.8 Meaning is not a static property inherent in words alone but is a dynamic construct influenced by linguistic and extralinguistic context.
Semantics is closely allied with pragmatics, which focuses on meaning in context—how utterances are used in actual situations to achieve communicative goals.9 While semantics often examines the literal, context-independent aspects of meaning (sense), pragmatics investigates how speakers convey and listeners infer meanings that go beyond the literal, such as implicatures, speech acts, and presuppositions.36 The boundary between semantics and pragmatics is not always sharply defined, and pragmatic factors frequently play a crucial role in initiating and driving semantic change. For instance, a meaning that is initially conveyed as a conversational implicature (an inferred meaning) can, over time, become conventionalized and incorporated into the semantic content of a word.36
This inherent dynamism leads to the phenomenon of semantic change, also referred to as semantic shift or semantic drift. This is a fundamental aspect of linguistic evolution where the usage and, consequently, the meaning of a word evolve over time, often to the point where its modern meaning can be radically different from its original sense.19 Semantic change involves alterations in a word's various senses (denotations) and its associated connotations (emotional or cultural associations). Every word can be seen as having a complex semantic history, a chronicle of the additions, removals, or modifications of its meanings.
B. A Typology of Semantic Change.
Linguists have identified and categorized various types of semantic change, providing a framework for analyzing how word meanings transform. These typologies, notably influenced by scholars like Leonard Bloomfield, Stephen Ullmann, and others, help to systematize the often complex and seemingly idiosyncratic shifts in meaning.19 The principal types include:
1. Changes in Scope:
These changes relate to the breadth or narrowness of a word's referential range.
Narrowing (Specialization): The meaning of a word becomes more restricted or specific over time. What was once a general term comes to denote a smaller, more particular subset of its original referents.
Example: The English word meat (Old English mete) originally referred to food in general (excluding liquids). Its meaning has narrowed to primarily denote animal flesh.19
Example: Corn in Old English could refer to any type of grain. In British English, it narrowed to mean 'wheat', and in American English, it further specialized to refer exclusively to maize.38
Example: The word skyline formerly denoted any horizon but has narrowed in American English to specifically refer to a horizon distinguished by skyscrapers.19
Widening (Generalization): The meaning of a word becomes broader or more inclusive. A term that originally denoted a specific item or concept expands to cover a wider category.
Example: The word barn evolved from the Old English compound bere-ærn ('barley-building') to refer to any agricultural storage building, not just one for barley.38
Example: Brand names often undergo widening to become generic terms for a product type, such as Kleenex for any facial tissue or Hoover for any vacuum cleaner (a process called genericide).19
Example: The word holiday originally meant a "holy day" but has broadened to encompass any day free from work or a period of recreation.39
2. Associative Changes:
These changes are driven by associations between concepts.
Metaphor: A word's meaning changes based on a perceived similarity or analogy between its original referent and a new referent.
Example: Broadcast originally meant "to scatter seeds widely." With the advent of radio and television, its meaning was extended metaphorically to describe the transmission of audio and video signals to a wide audience.19
Example: The word mouse, originally referring to a small rodent, was applied to the computer pointing device due to a perceived similarity in shape and movement.19
Metonymy: A word's meaning shifts based on contiguity, association, or a close conceptual relationship (e.g., cause for effect, container for contained, part for whole).
Example: The word jaw originally meant "cheek" but shifted to mean "mandible" due to the close anatomical association.19
Example: Referring to a monarch as "the crown" is a metonymic shift where an attribute or symbol stands for the entity itself.39
Synecdoche: Often considered a subtype of metonymy, synecdoche involves a part-to-whole or whole-to-part relationship.
Example: Using hands (part) to refer to sailors (whole), as in "all hands on deck".19
Example: Referring to a country by its capital city (e.g., "Washington announced a new policy").19
3. Changes in Connotation/Evaluation:
These changes involve a shift in the emotional or evaluative coloring of a word.
Pejoration (Degeneration): The meaning of a word becomes more negative or disparaging over time.
Example: Knave originally meant "boy" or "male servant" but degenerated to mean "a deceitful or despicable man".19
Example: Silly evolved from meaning "happy, blessed, innocent" in Old English to "pitiable," then "weak," and finally "foolish, lacking good sense".19
Example: Awful, originally meaning "inspiring awe" or "full of awe," underwent pejoration to mean "extremely bad" or "terrible".19
Amelioration (Elevation): The meaning of a word becomes more positive or favorable over time.
Example: Knight originally meant "boy" or "servant" (Old English cniht) but was elevated to denote a nobleman of high military rank and honor.19
Example: Nice, which in the 14th century meant "silly, foolish" (borrowed from French), gradually acquired positive connotations like "precise," "agreeable," and "kind".19
Example: Awesome, like awful, originally meant "inspiring awe (or fear)." However, it underwent amelioration, particularly in contemporary usage, to mean "extremely good" or "impressive" in a positive sense.19
The divergent paths of awful and awesome are particularly illustrative. Both words stem from the root concept of "awe," which historically encompassed feelings of both reverence and fear.19 The word awful came to emphasize the negative, fear-inducing aspect of awe, leading to its modern pejorative sense. In contrast, awesome (a later formation) initially shared the broader sense of "awe-inspiring" but eventually shifted towards an overwhelmingly positive connotation, signifying something exceptionally good or impressive.19 This bifurcation demonstrates how a single, emotionally potent or ambivalent root concept can serve as a starting point for semantic developments in opposing evaluative directions. The choice of derivational suffix (-ful vs. -some) might also have played a role in guiding these distinct trajectories, with -some often implying "tending to" or "characterized by" in a way that could lend itself to positive intensification in this context.47 This highlights the nuanced interplay of etymological roots, derivational morphology, and evolving usage patterns in shaping word meaning.
4. Changes in Intensity:
These changes relate to the strength or force of a word's meaning.
Hyperbole: A word's meaning shifts from weaker to stronger, often through exaggeration in common usage.
Example: Kill originally could mean "to strike or beat," later "to torment," before solidifying its modern meaning of "to cause death".19
Example: Decimate, which originally meant to kill one in every ten, is now commonly used hyperbolically to mean "to destroy a large proportion of".38
Meiosis (Understatement/Weakening): A word's meaning shifts from stronger to weaker.
Example: Astound originally meant "to strike with thunder" (related to astonish) but now means "to surprise strongly".19
Example: Soon in Old English meant "immediately," but its modern meaning is less temporally precise, indicating a weakening of its original immediacy.38
Many common intensifiers (e.g., terribly, awfully used to mean "very") have undergone weakening from their original literal senses.
5. Other Types:
Other recognized types of semantic change include:
Ellipsis: A word takes on the meaning of a longer phrase from which it was derived, with part of the phrase being omitted (e.g., daily from daily newspaper).19
Folk Etymology: As a mechanism, misanalysis of a word's origin can lead to changes in its form and sometimes its meaning to fit a more familiar pattern.19
Auto-antonymy (Contranym): A word develops a meaning that is the opposite of another of its meanings (e.g., sanction can mean 'to approve' or 'to penalize').
Semantic Bleaching: The meaning of a word becomes less specific and more general, losing much of its original semantic content, often occurring when words become grammaticalized or used as very general placeholders.
Example: Thing originally referred to an assembly or council in Old English but now is a vague reference to almost any entity or concept.48
The following table summarizes these principal types of semantic change:
Table 2: Principal Types of Semantic Change
C. The Impetus for Change: Linguistic, Psychological, Sociocultural, and Cultural/Encyclopedic Forces.
Semantic change is not a random process but is propelled by a complex interplay of various forces. Andreas Blank and other linguists have categorized these motivating factors, which can broadly be grouped as follows 19:
Linguistic Forces: These arise from the internal structure and dynamics of the language system itself. Factors include the inherent ambiguity of words, the need to avoid homonymic clashes (where two different words sound the same and could cause confusion), or the influence of syntactic context on word meaning.19 For example, if a word has multiple meanings (polysemy), one meaning might become dominant while others fade, or new meanings might arise to resolve potential ambiguities in specific contexts.
Psychological Forces: These relate to human cognitive processes and the way individuals perceive, categorize, and express their understanding of the world. Key psychological drivers include:
Cognitive Mechanisms: The propensity for metaphorical thinking (understanding one concept in terms of another), metonymic association (linking concepts based on contiguity), and analogical reasoning are powerful engines of semantic change.19
Expressive Needs: Speakers often seek more vivid, emphatic, or nuanced ways to express themselves, leading to the creative extension of existing word meanings or the adoption of new terms. This includes the use of hyperbole and meiosis.
Euphemism and Taboo: The desire to avoid direct reference to unpleasant, sensitive, or taboo subjects often leads to the creation of euphemisms (milder indirect terms) or dysphemisms (harsher terms). Over time, euphemisms themselves can acquire the negative connotations of what they replace, necessitating new euphemisms (the "euphemism treadmill").39
Sociocultural Forces: Language is a social phenomenon, and its evolution is profoundly shaped by social interactions, cultural norms, and societal shifts.2
Social Interaction and Group Identity: Different social groups may develop unique vocabularies or assign special meanings to words as markers of identity. The spread of these usages can lead to broader semantic change.
Prestige and Fashion: Words or meanings associated with prestigious social groups or current trends may be adopted more widely.
Politeness and Social Norms: The need to maintain social harmony and adhere to politeness conventions can influence word choice and lead to semantic shifts, particularly in the development of honorifics or indirect expressions.
Changes in Societal Values: As societal values and attitudes change, the connotations of words associated with those values can also evolve (e.g., words related to gender roles, social status, or morality).
Cultural/Encyclopedic Forces: These forces stem from changes in the external world, advancements in human knowledge, and shifts in how cultures understand and interact with their environment.2
Changes in the Referent: If the object or concept a word refers to changes, the word's meaning may adapt accordingly. For example, the word car originally referred to any wheeled vehicle but evolved with the invention of the automobile.
Technological Advancements: New inventions and technologies constantly create a need for new terminology or the adaptation of existing terms. This "need to name" is a powerful driver for certain types of semantic change, particularly metaphorical extension or the broadening of existing terms. When a novel concept or object emerges, especially in the realm of technology, language users often find it more intuitive and efficient to repurpose an existing word that shares some analogous feature rather than coining an entirely new and unfamiliar term. This is evident in the semantic evolution of words like mouse (from rodent to computer input device due to physical resemblance) 39, broadcast (from the agricultural scattering of seeds to the wide dissemination of radio and television signals) 40, and the verb to google (from the name of a specific search engine to the general act of searching online).26 This strategy leverages existing lexical knowledge and facilitates quicker adoption and understanding of terms for new phenomena.
New Knowledge and Worldview Shifts: Scientific discoveries, philosophical developments, and changes in a culture's overall worldview can lead to the reinterpretation of existing concepts and, consequently, the meanings of the words used to describe them.
These forces rarely act in isolation; semantic change usually results from a complex interplay of multiple factors.
V. Theoretical Lenses on Semantic Evolution
The study of how and why word meanings change has been approached from various theoretical perspectives within linguistics. These theories have themselves evolved, moving from descriptive classifications of change types to more explanatory models focusing on the underlying cognitive and pragmatic mechanisms.
A. Foundational Theories: From Structuralism to Cognitive Linguistics.
Early systematic studies of semantic change, emerging from 19th-century historical-comparative linguistics and later influenced by structuralism in the early to mid-20th century, often focused on classifying the outcomes of change.5 Linguists meticulously documented shifts like broadening, narrowing, metaphor, and metonymy, primarily analyzing lexical items (nouns and adjectives) often in isolation from their broader discourse context.
However, as linguistic theory developed, particularly with the rise of pragmatics and cognitive linguistics from the latter half of the 20th century onwards, the focus shifted. There was a growing recognition that language is fundamentally a communicative activity, deeply embedded in context—be it the immediate discourse, or broader social and ideological landscapes.54 Consequently, much recent work on semantic change has concentrated not merely on the results of change but on the pragmatic enabling factors and cognitive processes that drive these transformations within the dynamic flow of speech and interaction.5 Attention has increasingly turned to the contributions of analogical thinking, the ways speakers cue interpretations, how hearers perceive and infer meaning, and the specific mechanisms like metaphorization, metonymization, and subjectification, especially within the context of grammaticalization.5
B. Key Thinkers and Their Contributions.
Several influential linguists have shaped our understanding of semantic change:
Leonard Bloomfield: A key figure in American structuralism, Bloomfield proposed that each word possesses a central meaning alongside various occasional or marginal meanings. Semantic change, in his view, occurs when speakers cease to use the original central meaning and one of the marginal meanings is reinterpreted and adopted as the new central meaning.57 He illustrated this with the word sloth, which originally related to "slow" but shifted its central meaning to refer to the animal perceived to embody slowness, a previously marginal association.57
Stephen Ullmann: Ullmann made significant contributions to semantics, including the study of semantic change. He provided detailed classifications of the types of semantic change (such as metaphor, metonymy, narrowing, widening, pejoration, and amelioration) and also categorized the causes of these changes into linguistic, historical/cultural, social, and psychological factors.19 His work emphasized the dynamic relationship between the form of a word (its name) and its meaning (its sense).
Elizabeth Closs Traugott: A leading contemporary scholar in historical linguistics and grammaticalization, Traugott has profoundly influenced the study of semantic change by focusing on the role of pragmatics and cognitive processes. Her work highlights how meanings evolve through pragmatic inferencing in discourse, where hearers draw inferences that, if repeatedly made and adopted by a speech community, can become conventionalized as new semantic content.5 She is particularly known for her research on subjectification, the process whereby meanings become increasingly grounded in the speaker's subjective beliefs, attitudes, or perspective, a common pathway in grammaticalization.5 Her Invited Inferencing Theory of Semantic Change (IITSC) posits that speakers "invite" certain interpretations, and the conventionalization of these invited inferences drives semantic shifts.5 She has also extensively studied polysemy as a typical outcome of semantic change, where old and new meanings coexist.5
Dirk Geeraerts: A prominent figure in cognitive linguistics, Geeraerts has applied cognitive principles to the study of lexical semantics and semantic change. His work emphasizes the importance of prototype theory (where categories are structured around best examples or prototypes) and how changes in prototypical exemplars or category boundaries can lead to semantic shifts.5 He also explores the interplay between onomasiological perspectives (starting from a concept and examining the words used to express it) and semasiological perspectives (starting from a word and examining its range of meanings) in understanding lexical variation and change within a cognitive sociolinguistic framework.5
The trajectory of theoretical development in semantic change reveals a significant evolution in the field itself. Early theories, such as those by Bloomfield and Ullmann, were crucial for establishing classifications and identifying broad causal categories. They primarily focused on cataloging the what of semantic change—the types of shifts observed. In contrast, more recent work, heavily influenced by cognitive linguistics and pragmatics, as seen in the contributions of Traugott and Geeraerts, delves much deeper into the how and why. These process-oriented theories investigate the underlying cognitive mechanisms (like metaphor, metonymy, and inferencing) and the pragmatic dynamics of language use that actually drive these changes. This shift reflects a maturation of the discipline towards more robustly explanatory models that seek to understand the fundamental principles governing the evolution of meaning, rather than just describing its outcomes.
C. Cognitive Mechanisms: Conceptual Metaphor, Image Schemas, and Blending.
Cognitive linguistics offers powerful tools for understanding the mental processes that underpin semantic change. Three key concepts are particularly relevant:
Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Lakoff & Johnson): This influential theory posits that human thought processes are largely metaphorical. We understand and experience one kind of thing in terms of another, particularly by mapping concrete source domains onto abstract target domains.56 For example, the conceptual metaphor ARGUMENT IS WAR structures how we talk and think about disagreements (e.g., "attacking a position," "winning an argument"). Semantic change can occur when the conceptual metaphors prevalent in a culture evolve, or when new metaphors emerge to make sense of new experiences, leading to corresponding shifts in word meanings.56
Image Schemas (Johnson, Lakoff, Talmy): Image schemas are recurring, dynamic patterns of embodied experience that structure our understanding of the world at a pre-conceptual level. Examples include schemas like CONTAINER (in/out), PATH (source-path-goal), BALANCE, FORCE, and LINK.56 These schemas are derived from our physical interactions with the environment and provide a foundation for more abstract thought and meaning. Semantic change can be driven by the extension or reinterpretation of these basic image schemas to new conceptual domains. For instance, the PATH schema, initially related to physical movement, can be metaphorically extended to conceptualize abstract processes like "career paths" or "life's journey," influencing the semantic development of associated vocabulary.56
Conceptual Blending/Integration (Fauconnier & Turner): This theory describes a fundamental cognitive operation where elements and relations from diverse conceptual input spaces are selectively projected to a "blended" space, which then develops an emergent structure of its own.56 Blending is a dynamic, online process of meaning construction that accounts for creativity in language and thought. Semantic change can be understood as the conventionalization of particular blends over time. A novel conceptual blend that becomes frequently used and widely understood within a speech community can lead to a stable shift in the meaning of the linguistic expressions associated with it, effectively lexicalizing the emergent meaning of the blend.
These cognitive approaches collectively emphasize that semantics is not static or arbitrary but is grounded in human experience, perception, and cognitive processing.56 They provide frameworks for explaining how meanings can shift in systematic and motivated ways, reflecting the adaptive nature of human cognition and language.
VI. Disciplinary Intersections: Contributions to Understanding Word Evolution
The study of word origins, evolution, and meaning is a rich tapestry woven from the threads of various linguistic sub-disciplines. Each brings its unique perspective, methodologies, and insights, contributing to a more holistic understanding of lexical dynamics.
A. Historical Linguistics: Tracing Diachronic Pathways.
Historical linguistics, also known as diachronic linguistics, is the scientific study of how languages change over time.7 It provides the fundamental framework for understanding the long-term evolution of words. Its scope includes describing and explaining changes in individual languages, exploring the history of speech communities, reconstructing ancestral languages, and classifying languages into families based on shared ancestry.7
Key methodologies employed by historical linguists include the comparative method, which systematically compares related languages to identify regular sound correspondences and reconstruct proto-forms, and internal reconstruction, which infers earlier stages of a language by analyzing irregularities within that single language.7 These methods are applied to trace phonological, grammatical, and semantic changes. Etymology, the study of the history of individual words, including their source and changes in form and meaning, is a crucial subfield of historical linguistics.7 Academic publications such as the Journal of Historical Linguistics serve as platforms for disseminating research in this area, covering topics from diachronic corpus linguistics to the reconstruction of proto-languages.63
B. Sociolinguistics: Language as a Social Construct.
Sociolinguistics examines the intricate relationship between language and society. It studies how language use is shaped by, and varies within, different social contexts, and how it is influenced by social groups, cultural norms, and power dynamics.10 This field investigates how social factors such as class, gender, ethnicity, age, and education drive language variation and, crucially, language change, including shifts in word meaning.10
For example, the semantic trajectory of a word like queer—from 'strange' to a derogatory term for homosexuals, and its subsequent reappropriation by the LGBTQ+ community as a positive identity marker—can only be fully understood through a sociolinguistic lens that considers social movements, identity politics, and the power of language to reflect and shape social attitudes.5 Similarly, the rapid evolution of vocabulary and meaning driven by social media platforms is a prime area of sociolinguistic inquiry, demonstrating how new communication technologies and social trends can accelerate semantic change.50
C. Psycholinguistics: Meaning in Mind and Processing.
Psycholinguistics explores the cognitive mechanisms that underlie language processing. It investigates how word meaning is acquired, stored in the mental lexicon, accessed during comprehension, and retrieved for production.12 Key concepts include word recognition models (such as the Cohort Model, which describes how words are identified from auditory input), semantic priming (where exposure to a semantically related word speeds up the processing of a target word), and different modes of semantic processing (e.g., convergent processing, focusing on a single best meaning, versus divergent processing, activating a wider network of associations).12
The dual lexicon model proposes two parallel neural pathways for lexical processing: a ventral stream connecting sound to meaning, and a dorsal stream connecting sound to articulation.65 This model offers a neurobiological framework for understanding how semantic information (meaning) and phonological information (form) are represented and integrated in the brain. Such models have implications for how lexical evolution, including both sound changes and meaning shifts, might be instantiated and processed at a cognitive level. Understanding these psycholinguistic processes is crucial for explaining the cognitive basis of semantic stability as well as the mechanisms that permit and constrain semantic change.
D. Philology: The Scrutiny of Historical Texts.
Philology is the study of language as it appears in oral and written historical sources. Its primary aims are to establish the authenticity and original form of these texts and to determine their meaning within their historical and cultural contexts.6 Philology intersects significantly with textual criticism (reconstructing original texts from variant manuscripts), literary criticism, history, and linguistics, and has particularly strong ties to etymology.14
The meticulous analysis of ancient and historical texts undertaken by philologists provides invaluable data for tracing the long-term semantic evolution of words. By examining how words were used in different periods and diverse textual genres, philologists can reconstruct past meanings, identify shifts in usage, and understand the cultural and intellectual currents that may have influenced these changes.6 The emergence of digital philology has further enhanced these capabilities, allowing for the creation and analysis of large digital corpora of historical texts and facilitating new modes of scholarly editing and textual analysis.67
Across these diverse disciplinary approaches—from the broad diachronic sweep of historical linguistics to the socially embedded analyses of sociolinguistics, the cognitive explorations of psycholinguistics, and the text-centered investigations of philology—a unifying theme emerges: the indispensable role of context in understanding word meaning and its evolution. Whether it is the historical context essential for accurate etymological reconstruction 6, the social context that shapes sociolinguistic variation and change 10, the cognitive and situational context influencing psycholinguistic processing of meaning 12, or the textual and cultural context vital for philological interpretation 14, it is clear that meaning is not an immutable property of words in isolation. Instead, meaning is dynamically constructed, negotiated, and understood in relation to its multifaceted environment. This consistent emphasis across subfields underscores that words and their meanings cannot be fully comprehended in a vacuum; their evolution and interpretation are deeply interwoven with the various layers of context in which they are used.
The following table summarizes the primary contributions of these linguistic subfields to the study of word evolution:
Table 3: Linguistic Subfields and Their Contributions to Understanding Word Evolution
VII. External Influences on the Lexicon
The evolution of a language's lexicon is not solely an internal affair governed by linguistic principles. It is profoundly shaped by the external world, including major historical events, transformative technological advancements, and the ever-shifting dynamics of culture and society. These external forces can introduce new words, render old ones obsolete, and significantly alter the meanings and connotations of existing vocabulary.
A. Historical Events as Shapers of Vocabulary and Meaning.
Throughout history, significant events such as invasions, migrations, revolutions, and broad cultural movements have left indelible marks on the languages of the societies experiencing them.3 These events often lead to extensive vocabulary borrowing, the loss of native terms, and profound semantic shifts as languages adapt to new political, social, and demographic realities.
The history of the English language offers numerous examples. The Roman occupation of Britain, while not directly transforming the indigenous Celtic languages into Romance ones, laid a Latinate foundation that would be drawn upon later. The subsequent arrival of Germanic tribes (Angles, Saxons, Jutes) established Old English, the core of the language.31 The Christianization of Anglo-Saxon England from the late 6th century introduced a wave of religious and scholarly terms from Latin and Greek.31 The Viking invasions, beginning in the late 8th century, resulted in significant contact with Old Norse, leading to the incorporation of many common words like sky, skin, leg, and even the pronoun they into English.31
Perhaps the most transformative event was the Norman Conquest of 1066. For centuries, Norman French became the language of the ruling class, law, administration, and high culture in England. This resulted in an enormous influx of French vocabulary into Middle English, particularly in domains such as government (e.g., parliament, sovereign), law (e.g., judge, jury, felony), military (e.g., army, battle, soldier), fashion, and cuisine.2 This period also saw a simplification of Old English grammar. Even the word evolution itself has a history shaped by external contexts; it was first used in English in the 17th century, derived from Latin evolutio (unrolling of a scroll), to describe military maneuvers based on translations of ancient Greek tactical treatises, long before Charles Darwin applied a related concept to biology.70
B. Technological Advancements and their Linguistic Imprint.
Technological innovation has consistently been a powerful catalyst for lexical change. New inventions, scientific discoveries, and modes of production create new concepts and objects that require names, leading to the coining of neologisms or the repurposing of existing words with new, specialized meanings.2
The word broadcast exemplifies this. Originally an agricultural term meaning "to scatter seeds widely," its meaning was metaphorically extended in the early 20th century to describe the new technology of radio and television signal transmission.19 Similarly, mouse, referring to a small rodent, acquired a new meaning in the 1960s as the name for the computer input device, due to its physical resemblance.39 The verb to google emerged directly from the dominance of the Google search engine, transforming a proper noun into a generic term for online searching.26 The term deadline offers another compelling case: its modern sense of a "time limit" in journalism and beyond is thought to have been influenced by its grim 19th-century usage referring to a literal line in Civil War prisons that prisoners crossed at peril of death.72
More recently, the internet, mobile communication, and social media have dramatically accelerated the pace of language change. These platforms have fostered a plethora of neologisms (e.g., selfie, blog, emoji, tweet, hashtag), new meanings for existing words (e.g., viral, friend as a verb, thread in online discussions), and distinct communication styles characterized by abbreviations, acronyms, and informal language.33
C. Cultural and Societal Dynamics: Language as a Mirror and a Mold.
Language serves as both a mirror reflecting and a mold shaping cultural values, beliefs, social norms, and power structures.4 As these societal dynamics shift, so too does the language, particularly the meanings and connotations of words. The semantic histories of many common English words illustrate this close relationship:
The word nice underwent a remarkable amelioration from meaning "foolish, ignorant" in the 13th-14th centuries to its modern sense of "pleasant, kind".45 This shift likely reflects evolving social ideals of agreeableness and refinement.
Conversely, silly experienced pejoration, moving from "happy, blessed, innocent" in Old English to its current meaning of "foolish, lacking good sense".42
The words awful and awesome, both stemming from "awe," diverged dramatically, with awful becoming negative ("exceedingly bad") and awesome becoming positive ("excellent") in contemporary usage, reflecting different paths of evaluative specialization.43
Knight transformed from meaning "boy, servant" to "noble warrior," an elevation tied to the development of feudalism and chivalric culture.44
Salary traces its origin to Latin salarium ("salt-money"), referring to the allowance given to Roman soldiers for purchasing salt, a valuable commodity. Its meaning narrowed to "fixed periodic payment for services".81
Disaster originated from Italian disastro ("ill-starred"), reflecting astrological beliefs about planetary influence on misfortune, before broadening to mean any great calamity.83
Clue (originally clew) meant a "ball of thread," its modern sense of a "hint" or "guide to a solution" deriving metaphorically from the thread Ariadne gave Theseus to navigate the Labyrinth.86
Enthusiasm evolved from Greek enthousiasmos ("divine inspiration, possession by a god"), underwent a period of pejoration in 17th-century English (denoting "excessive religious emotion"), and then ameliorated to its current meaning of "intense fervor or zeal".89
Sinister, from Latin for "left," acquired negative connotations ("evil, ominous") due to ancient augural practices where omens appearing on the left were often considered unfavorable.90
Cross-linguistic examples further underscore the impact of cultural context:
Japanese kawaii evolved from meanings like "face-flushing," "embarrassed," or "pitiable" to its globally recognized sense of "cute, lovable," deeply embedded in contemporary Japanese popular culture and aesthetics.91
Latin virtus, derived from vir ("man"), initially signified "manliness" and "valor" in battle, then broadened to encompass "moral virtue" and "excellence" in general, reflecting Roman societal values.95
German Zeitgeist, a compound of Zeit ("time") and Geist ("spirit"), was coined to capture the defining intellectual, moral, and cultural spirit of an era, a concept that gained prominence during the Enlightenment and Romanticism.98
Mandarin Chinese guanxi (关系), literally "closed system" or "connections," refers to a complex and culturally crucial network of interpersonal relationships involving mutual obligations, trust, and favor exchange, essential in Chinese social and business life.101
French travail (and Spanish trabajar) meaning "work," has a striking etymology, tracing back to the Vulgar Latin *tripalium, an instrument of torture, reflecting historical perceptions of labor as arduous and compulsory.104
German böse, which in Middle High German could mean "bad, evil; worthless," later also developed the sense of "furious, angry," showcasing a shift in primary connotation depending on context.106
This dynamic interplay reveals a cyclical relationship: language does not merely passively reflect societal and cultural changes; it actively participates in constructing and reinforcing them.32 The evolution of word meanings can be both a symptom of underlying shifts in societal values, beliefs, or practices and a catalyst for further change in perception and behavior. For example, as the meaning of a word like nice shifts to denote qualities that are socially valued (e.g., "kindness"), the use of the word in its new sense helps to promote and validate those qualities within the society. This creates a feedback loop where language and society co-evolve, each influencing the trajectory of the other.
VIII. The Computational Turn: New Methods and Frontiers
The study of word origins, evolution, and meaning has been significantly reshaped in recent decades by the advent of computational methods and the availability of vast digital linguistic resources. These tools allow researchers to analyze language at an unprecedented scale, uncover subtle patterns of change, and test linguistic theories with greater empirical rigor.
A. Corpus Linguistics: Analyzing Language at Scale.
Corpus linguistics is an empirical approach to the study of language that relies on the analysis of corpora (singular: corpus)—large, structured, and often electronically stored collections of authentic written or spoken texts.108 By examining patterns of word usage in these real-world language samples, linguists can conduct quantitative analyses of word frequency, collocations (words that frequently appear together), grammatical structures, and, crucially for this report, semantic change over time.19
Historical corpora, such as the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts, the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA), and the Corpus of Founding Era American English (COFEA), are specifically designed to facilitate diachronic studies by including texts from different historical periods.110 These resources enable researchers to track changes in word usage and meaning across centuries. Methodologies common in corpus linguistics include concordance analysis (examining every occurrence of a word in its context), annotation (tagging texts with linguistic information like part-of-speech), abstraction (mapping annotated data to theoretical models), and various forms of statistical analysis.108
Despite its power, historical corpus linguistics faces challenges, including the "philologist's dilemma" (the risk that computational analysis might overshadow deep textual knowledge), the "God's truth fallacy" (the danger of overgeneralizing from a corpus that may not be perfectly representative), and the "mystery of vanishing reliability" (as more variables are coded, achieving statistical robustness for each sub-category becomes harder without extremely large corpora).110
B. Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing (NLP) in Semantic Studies.
Computational linguistics is the interdisciplinary field concerned with the scientific understanding and modeling of human language using computational methods and tools.16 Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a branch of artificial intelligence and computational linguistics that focuses on enabling computers to process, interpret, manipulate, and comprehend human language in a valuable way.16
A range of NLP techniques are fundamental to the computational study of semantics and semantic change. These include:
Tokenization: Breaking down text into individual words or meaningful units (tokens).
Stemming and Lemmatization: Reducing words to their base or dictionary form (e.g., "running" to "run").
Part-of-Speech (PoS) Tagging: Assigning grammatical categories (noun, verb, adjective, etc.) to words in context.
Syntactic Parsing: Analyzing the grammatical structure of sentences.
Word-Sense Disambiguation (WSD): Identifying the specific meaning of a word in a given context when the word has multiple senses (polysemy).16
These tools are increasingly being applied to historical linguistics and etymology to automatically process and analyze large historical text datasets, identify linguistic features, and model processes of language change.15
C. Modeling Lexical and Semantic Evolution.
A significant area of current research involves developing computational models to automatically detect, quantify, and characterize lexical and semantic evolution using diachronic corpora.15 Several approaches have proven fruitful:
Word Embeddings: These are techniques that represent words as dense vectors in a multi-dimensional semantic space, where words with similar meanings are located closer to each other. Popular models include Word2Vec (e.g., CBOW, Skip-gram), GloVe, SVD (Singular Value Decomposition), and PPMI (Positive Pointwise Mutual Information).17 By training separate embedding models on corpora from different time periods and then aligning these models (e.g., using Orthogonal Procrustes), researchers can track the movement of word vectors over time, quantifying shifts in meaning.18
Change Point Detection: Once time-series data representing word meanings (e.g., from aligned embeddings) have been generated, statistical techniques like the CUSUM (Cumulative Sum) algorithm can be applied to detect "change points"—specific moments in time when a word's meaning appears to have undergone a significant shift.17
Predictive Modeling: Researchers are also developing algorithms that aim to predict how word meanings might evolve. Some models are based on the idea of "chaining," where new meanings of a word tend to connect closely to related existing meanings in the semantic space, forming a pathway of semantic extension.117
Laws of Semantic Change: Computational analyses of large corpora have led to the formulation of statistical regularities in semantic change. For example, Hamilton, Leskovec, and Jurafsky proposed two such laws: (i) the Law of Conformity, which states that the rate of semantic change scales with an inverse power-law of word frequency (i.e., more frequent words change meaning more slowly), and (ii) the Law of Innovation, which posits that, independent of frequency, polysemous words (words with many senses) change meaning faster.17
D. Contemporary Research Directions and Unresolved Questions.
The computational study of lexical and semantic evolution is a vibrant and rapidly developing field.
Current Trends:
Improving the accuracy, robustness, and interpretability of semantic change detection models, including the use of advanced contextualized embeddings (e.g., from models like BERT).18
Applying these methods to analyze semantic shifts in specific domains, such as biomedical literature 18, political discourse 20, or social media content.50
Investigating the interplay between lexical replacement (one word replacing another) and semantic change within semantic fields.114
Developing techniques for cross-lingual lexical semantic change detection, comparing how meanings evolve across different languages.20
Striving to integrate insights from cognitive theories of semantics with computational models to build more explanatorily adequate systems.
Unsolved Problems and Challenges:
Evaluation and Gold Standards: A major hurdle is the lack of large-scale, manually annotated gold standard datasets for evaluating semantic change detection models across different languages and time periods. This hinders rigorous comparison and progress.118
Characterizing Change: While models can detect that a meaning has changed, characterizing how it has changed (e.g., narrowing, metaphor, pejoration) in an automated way remains a significant challenge.119
Distinguishing Signal from Noise: Differentiating genuine, lasting semantic change from temporary contextual variations, stylistic choices, or noise in historical data is difficult.114
Interplay of Changes: Understanding the complex interactions between different types of linguistic change (e.g., how phonological or morphological changes might influence semantic evolution) is still an open area.
Data Sparsity: Applying these computational methods to under-resourced languages or historical periods with limited textual data poses considerable challenges.
Adaptability and Ethics: Ensuring that NLP applications can adapt to the rapid evolution of online language and are developed and used in an ethically sound manner, respecting privacy and avoiding bias, is crucial.50
A persistent challenge within computational models of semantic change is what might be termed the "black box" problem. While increasingly sophisticated algorithms, especially those based on deep neural networks, can achieve high accuracy in detecting semantic shifts over time 17, their internal workings are often opaque. This makes it difficult to explain the detected changes in a way that is linguistically and cognitively plausible and aligns with established theories of semantic evolution, such as those involving metaphor, metonymy, or specific social drivers.114 Many models excel at prediction but may fall short in providing deep causal explanations that connect back to the rich theoretical frameworks developed in historical semantics by scholars like Traugott, Geeraerts, or Ullmann. Bridging this gap between computational detection and linguistic explanation is a key frontier for future research. The formulation of quantitative "Laws of Semantic Change" 17 represents a step in this direction, but much more work is needed to make these models truly interpretable and integrated with linguistic theory.
IX. Case Studies: Words on Their Journeys
The principles and processes of word origin, evolution, and meaning change are best illustrated through concrete examples. The following words, woven throughout this report, showcase diverse etymological paths and semantic trajectories, shaped by the various linguistic, cognitive, sociocultural, and technological forces discussed.
The words silly and nice offer compelling parallel studies in evaluative shifts. Silly began its journey in Old English (gesælig) meaning "happy, blessed, pious".45 This positive connotation gradually eroded through stages of "innocent," "harmless," then "pitiable," "weak," and finally, by the 16th century, "feeble in mind, foolish".38 This trajectory is a classic example of pejoration. Conversely, nice, borrowed from Old French in the late 13th century with the meaning "foolish, ignorant, senseless" (itself from Latin nescius, "ignorant") 45, underwent a remarkable amelioration. It passed through senses like "timid," "fussy," "dainty," "precise," eventually arriving at its modern positive meanings of "agreeable, delightful" and "kind, thoughtful" by the 18th-19th centuries.38 These opposing journeys highlight how societal values and perceptions can drastically reshape a word's evaluative load.
The concept of "awe" has spawned two words, awful and awesome, that have taken dramatically divergent semantic paths. Both originate from "awe," a term historically encompassing reverence, wonder, and fear.19 Awful, meaning "worthy of respect or fear" around 1300, largely retained and intensified the negative, fear-inducing aspect, undergoing pejoration to its contemporary meaning of "extremely bad" or "terrible".19 Awesome, a later formation, initially shared the meaning "inspiring awe (or fear)" but then underwent amelioration and a degree of semantic weakening in popular use to mean "extremely good" or "impressive" in a positive manner.19 This bifurcation from a single, potent root underscores how initial emotional ambivalence can lead to contrasting semantic developments.
Technological and cultural innovations frequently drive semantic change through metaphor and broadening. The word broadcast, initially an agricultural term from 1767 meaning "dispersed upon the ground by hand" (referring to seeds), was metaphorically extended with the advent of radio in 1922 to mean the wide dissemination of signals.19 Similarly, mouse, the small rodent, lent its name metaphorically to the computer input device in 1965 due to perceived similarities in shape and movement.39 The verb to google is a prime example of functional shift (noun to verb) and broadening, where the proper name of a dominant search engine became a generic term for online searching around 2000.26 Deadline transitioned from its grim 1864 meaning of a "do-not-cross" line in Civil War prisons to the newspaper jargon term for a "time limit" around 1920, a metaphorical transfer of a critical boundary.72 These examples illustrate the "need to name" new concepts, where existing words are often repurposed.
Socio-cultural roots deeply influence word histories. Salary traces back to Latin salarium, "salt-money," an allowance for Roman soldiers to buy salt, then a valuable commodity. It underwent narrowing and metonymy to mean a fixed, periodic payment for services.81 Disaster, from Italian disastro ("ill-starred"), originally reflected astrological beliefs that unfavorable planetary alignments caused calamities. It broadened metaphorically to mean any great misfortune.83 Clue, originally clew ("a ball of thread"), acquired its meaning of "a hint or guide to a solution" through a metaphorical extension from the Greek myth of Theseus using a thread to escape the Labyrinth.86 Enthusiasm, from Greek enthousiasmos ("divine inspiration"), experienced pejoration in 17th-century Puritan England to mean "excessive religious emotion," then ameliorated and broadened to its current sense of "fervor, zeal".89 Sinister, from Latin for "left," underwent pejoration to mean "evil" or "unfavorable," influenced by ancient augury practices where the left side was often associated with ill omens.90 The word philology itself evolved from Greek "love of words/learning" to a more specialized meaning of "the historical study of language" in some contexts, while retaining broader senses in others, demonstrating narrowing and contextual variation.14
Cross-linguistic examples further illuminate these processes. Japanese kawaii evolved from "face-flushing/embarrassed/pitiable" to "cute/lovable," an amelioration deeply tied to Japanese cultural aesthetics.91 Latin virtus, from vir ("man"), broadened from "manliness/valor" to "moral virtue/excellence" via metaphorical extension.95 German Zeitgeist ("time-spirit") is a semantic compound capturing the spirit of an era.98 Mandarin guanxi (关系), meaning "connections," broadened and became culturally embedded to signify a complex network of social and business relationships with mutual obligations.101 French travail ("work") traces its etymology to *tripalium, a Roman instrument of torture, reflecting a historical perception of labor as suffering, undergoing broadening and some amelioration.104 German böse shifted from primarily "bad/evil" to include "angry," showing a contextual shift in dominant connotation.106
The consistent appearance of metaphor and metonymy across such a diverse range of word histories—from broadcast and mouse to clue, disaster, salary, and virtus—strongly suggests that these are not merely occasional linguistic quirks but fundamental cognitive mechanisms that drive semantic evolution. These processes allow language to remain flexible and adaptive by enabling speakers to extend existing conceptual structures to new domains or to associate related concepts, thereby creating new meanings or nuances for existing words. They are powerful engines for lexical creativity and semantic expansion, reflecting the human capacity to perceive similarities and contiguities in the world and to map these perceptions onto linguistic forms.
X. Conclusion: The Unceasing Evolution of Words and Their Meanings
A. Synthesis of Key Findings.
This exploration into the linguistics of word origins, evolution, and meaning has revealed the profoundly dynamic nature of the lexicon. Words are not static tokens with fixed definitions but are, in essence, living entities that are born, adapt, and transform over time. Their genesis is rooted in complex processes of etymology and word formation, where new lexical items are crafted from existing material through mechanisms like compounding, derivation, blending, and borrowing, or coined anew to meet expressive needs.6 Once part of a language, words embark on an evolutionary journey, subject to broader currents of linguistic change that affect phonology, grammar, and syntax.1
Perhaps most strikingly, the meanings of words are in constant flux, undergoing various types of semantic change such as narrowing, widening, metaphor, metonymy, pejoration, and amelioration.19 These shifts are not arbitrary but are driven by an intricate interplay of internal linguistic pressures, human psychological and cognitive processes, pervasive sociocultural forces, and transformative cultural or technological developments.4 The study of these phenomena is inherently interdisciplinary, drawing crucial insights from historical linguistics, sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, philology, and increasingly, computational linguistics.6
B. The Interplay of Internal Mechanisms and External Pressures.
A central theme emerging from this analysis is that the evolution of words is governed by a complex interplay between the internal mechanisms of language and cognition, and the external pressures exerted by the world in which language is used. Internal factors, such as the inherent structure of language, the cognitive propensity for analogy and metaphor, and the psychological need for clear and expressive communication, provide the pathways and potential for change.19 For instance, the human ability to perceive similarities allows for metaphorical extension, a prolific source of new meanings.19
Simultaneously, external pressures—historical events like invasions or revolutions 31, technological breakthroughs that introduce novel concepts 33, shifts in cultural values and social norms 4, and contact with other languages and cultures 2—create the impetus and context for these changes to occur and become conventionalized. The "need to name" new technologies, for example, often leads to the repurposing of existing words through metaphor, as seen with "mouse" or "broadcast".40 Similarly, changing social attitudes can lead to the pejoration or amelioration of terms associated with certain concepts or groups.19 Thus, word evolution is neither a purely abstract linguistic process nor a simple reflection of external events, but a dynamic interaction where the inherent capacities of language and human cognition respond to, and are shaped by, the evolving human experience.
C. Future Perspectives in the Study of Lexical Dynamics.
The study of word origins, evolution, and meaning remains a vibrant and evolving field. The increasing availability of large-scale diachronic corpora and the sophistication of computational linguistic tools are opening new frontiers for research, allowing for the analysis of language change at an unprecedented scale and with greater quantitative rigor.17 This computational turn, however, also brings challenges, notably in ensuring that models are not mere "black boxes" but offer linguistically and cognitively plausible explanations for change, and in developing robust evaluation benchmarks.118
Continued interdisciplinary collaboration will be essential. Insights from cognitive science into how humans process and represent meaning 56, from sociolinguistics into the social mechanisms of innovation and spread 10, and from historical studies into the specific contexts of past changes 31 must be integrated to build more comprehensive theories of lexical dynamics. Understanding the nuances of language change has practical implications for fields such as natural language processing (enabling machines to better understand and adapt to evolving language), translation (ensuring historical and cultural accuracy), and education (fostering a deeper appreciation of language's richness and history).
Ultimately, the unceasing evolution of words and their meanings serves as a dynamic and finely grained record of human adaptation. As societies encounter new environments, develop new ideas, and forge new ways of interacting, their languages transform to reflect and facilitate these changes. The lexicon, therefore, is not merely a static inventory of labels but a living archive of human thought, culture, and societal development. The study of its evolution offers profound insights into the trajectory of the human experience itself, underscoring the deep and enduring connection between language and life. The constant flux of words is a testament to the creativity and adaptability of the human mind and the societies it constructs.
Works cited
www.98thpercentile.com, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.98thpercentile.com/blog/linguistic-evolution-how-language-changes-over-time#:~:text=Language%20is%20a%20dynamic%20and,time%2C%20much%20like%20biological%20evolution.
Language Evolution - Learn How Language Changes - 98thPercentile, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.98thpercentile.com/blog/linguistic-evolution-how-language-changes-over-time
www.researchgate.net, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_does_historical_context_influence_the_meaning_of_words_and_why_is_it_important_in_translation#:~:text=Historical%20context%20plays%20a%20crucial,technological%20advancements%2C%20or%20societal%20transformations.
THE INFLUENCE OF CULTURE ON LANGUAGE AND SPEECH ..., accessed May 14, 2025, https://fledu.uz/language/en/the-influence-of-culture-on-language-and-speech/
Semantic change - Elizabeth Traugott, accessed May 14, 2025, https://traugott.people.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj28616/files/media/file/traugott2017a.pdf
Etymology - Wikipedia, accessed May 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etymology
Historical linguistics - Wikipedia, accessed May 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_linguistics
www.sheffield.ac.uk, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/linguistics/home/all-about-linguistics/about-website/branches-linguistics/semantics#:~:text=Semantics%20is%20a%20sub%2Ddiscipline,speakers%20and%20listeners%20of%20language.
www.sheffield.ac.uk, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/linguistics/home/all-about-linguistics/about-website/branches-linguistics/pragmatics/what-pragmatics#:~:text=A%20Definition%20of%20Pragmatics,in%20actual%20situations.%5B1%5D
Sociolinguistics - Wikipedia, accessed May 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociolinguistics
Sociolinguistics | Definition, Examples, History, William Labov ..., accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/sociolinguistics
Semantic processing - Wikipedia, accessed May 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_processing
sites.socsci.uci.edu, accessed May 14, 2025, https://sites.socsci.uci.edu/~lpearl/courses/ling200_2004sum1/LING200/Psycholinguistics.pdf
Philology - Wikipedia, accessed May 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philology
Computational modeling of semantic change - ACL Anthology, accessed May 14, 2025, https://aclanthology.org/2024.eacl-tutorials.1/
What is NLP? - Natural Language Processing Explained - AWS, accessed May 14, 2025, https://aws.amazon.com/what-is/nlp/
Diachronic Word Embeddings Reveal Statistical Laws of Semantic Change - Stanford University, accessed May 14, 2025, https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/pubs/paper-hist_vec.pdf
Changing word meanings in biomedical literature reveal pandemics ..., accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.06.27.497742v1.full-text
Semantic change - Wikipedia, accessed May 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_change
Computational modeling of semantic change Tutorial at EACL 2024 ..., accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.changeiskey.org/event/2024-eacl-tutorial/
ETYMOLOGY Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/etymology
Historical linguistics | Language Change, Comparative Method ..., accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/historical-linguistics
Words in English: Types of Word Formation - Rice University, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.ruf.rice.edu/~kemmer/Words/wordtypes.html
Linguistic Society of America - Wikipedia, accessed May 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_Society_of_America
WORD FORMATION PROCESSES | PPT - SlideShare, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/word-formation-processes-251626093/251626093
Google (verb) - Wikipedia, accessed May 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_(verb)
en.wikipedia.org, accessed May 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neologism#:~:text=In%20linguistics%2C%20a%20neologism%20(%2F,becoming%20accepted%20into%20mainstream%20language.
Neologism | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/language-and-linguistics/neologism
Neologism - Wikipedia, accessed May 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neologism
Etymology of "google" by etymonline, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.etymonline.com/word/google
The History of the English Language - ThoughtCo, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.thoughtco.com/events-history-of-the-english-language-1692746
dialnet.unirioja.es, accessed May 14, 2025, https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/9334328.pdf
How and Why Does Language Change Over Time? | Prestige Network, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.prestigenetwork.com/insights/how-and-why-does-language-change-over-time/
Technology's Impact on Language - Greenfield High School, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.greenfieldhs.org/apps/pages/TechnogloysImpactOnLanguage_JavierDominguezTrejo
Semantics | Linguistic Research | The University of Sheffield, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/linguistics/home/all-about-linguistics/about-website/branches-linguistics/semantics
PRAGMATICS IN LINGUISTICS, accessed May 14, 2025, https://pbi.ftk.uin-alauddin.ac.id/artikel-3531-pragmatics-in-linguistics
ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub, accessed May 14, 2025, https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/essentialsoflinguistics2/chapter/14-6-semantic-change/#:~:text=Change%20in%20the%20meanings%20of,older%20and%20the%20newer%20meanings.
Chapter 13.1 Methods of Semantic Change – ALIC – Analyzing ..., accessed May 14, 2025, https://alic.sites.unlv.edu/chapter-13-1-semantic-change/
Semantic Change - Historical Linguistics - Socratica, accessed May 14, 2025, https://learn.socratica.com/en/topic/linguistics/historical-linguistics/semantic-change
en.wikipedia.org, accessed May 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_change#:~:text=For%20example%2C%20broadcast%20originally%20meant,of%20audio%20and%20video%20signals.
The Relationship Between English Etymology and Semantic Change - ResearchGate, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385150161_The_Relationship_Between_English_Etymology_and_Semantic_Change
www.dictionary.com, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.dictionary.com/browse/silly#:~:text=The%20word%20acquired%20the%20senses,foolish%2C%20irrational%2C%20ridiculous.%E2%80%9D
en.wikipedia.org, accessed May 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_change#:~:text=Awful%20%E2%80%93%20Literally%20%22full%20of%20awe,word%20means%20%22extremely%20good%22.
The changing meanings of 'nice' and 'silly' - Michigan Public, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.michiganpublic.org/arts-culture/2013-10-27/the-changing-meanings-of-nice-and-silly
The Not-So-Nice Origins of 'Nice' - Today's Catholic, accessed May 14, 2025, https://todayscatholic.org/the-not-so-nice-origins-of-nice/
Why do the words "awesome" and "awful" have such different meanings despite both containing "awe"? : r/etymology - Reddit, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/etymology/comments/ahxjqf/why_do_the_words_awesome_and_awful_have_such/
Why is semantics studied? | Linguistic Research | The University of Sheffield, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/linguistics/home/all-about-linguistics/about-website/branches-linguistics/semantics/why-semantics-studied
revistia.com, accessed May 14, 2025, https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejls_v1_i3_15/Sonila.pdf
(PDF) Impact of social media on the evolution of English semantics ..., accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379124307_Impact_of_social_media_on_the_evolution_of_English_semantics_through_linguistic_analysis
How does historical context influence the meaning of words, and ..., accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_does_historical_context_influence_the_meaning_of_words_and_why_is_it_important_in_translation
Etymology of "mouse" by etymonline, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.etymonline.com/word/mouse
Etymology of "broadcast" by etymonline, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.etymonline.com/word/broadcast
Semantic Change | Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, accessed May 14, 2025, https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-323
Semantic Change | Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, accessed May 14, 2025, https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-323?d=%2F10.1093%2Facrefore%2F9780199384655.001.0001%2Facrefore-9780199384655-e-323&p=emailAa3vp1KdwzqQ.
Cognitive Semantics - Linguistics - Oxford Bibliographies, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780199772810/obo-9780199772810-0279.xml
www.sfu.ca, accessed May 14, 2025, http://www.sfu.ca/~mcrobbie/Ling407/Lecture14.pdf
Semantics - An Introduction To The Science of Meaning | PDF | Linguistics - Scribd, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/739385473/Semantics-An-Introduction-to-the-Science-of-Meaning
Ten Lectures on Cognitive Sociolinguistics - Dirk Geeraerts, accessed May 14, 2025, https://brill.figshare.com/collections/Ten_Lectures_on_Cognitive_Sociolinguistics_-_Dirk_Geeraerts/3784517
Fundamental cognitive-semantic theories in linguistics - Revista Eduweb, accessed May 14, 2025, https://revistaeduweb.org/index.php/eduweb/article/download/464/497/793
en.wikipedia.org, accessed May 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_linguistics#:~:text=documented%20languages'%20divergences.-,Etymology,meaning%20have%20changed%20over%20time.
www.britannica.com, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/historical-linguistics#:~:text=historical%20linguistics%2C%20the%20branch%20of,among%20languages%20can%20be%20demonstrated.
Journal of historical linguistics (John Benjamins Publishing Company) | 60 Publications | 7 Citations | Top authors - SciSpace, accessed May 14, 2025, https://scispace.com/journals/journal-of-historical-linguistics-32g0kh7f
Journal of Historical Linguistics | John Benjamins, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/22102124
The cortical organization of lexical knowledge: A dual lexicon model ..., accessed May 14, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3348354/
Philology | Historical Linguistics, Textual Criticism & Comparative Studies - Britannica, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/philology
Digital Philology - Language Technologies and Digital Humanities - Università degli Studi di Torino, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.digitalhumanities.unito.it/do/corsi.pl/Show?_id=ehy6
Digital Philology: A Journal of Medieval Cultures | Hopkins Press, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.press.jhu.edu/journals/digital-philology-journal-medieval-cultures
The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-formal-semantics/A8D746530C47859ECFC940C92B1E2C73
The evolution of the word 'evolution' | OUPblog, accessed May 14, 2025, https://blog.oup.com/2015/05/word-evolution-etymology/
Defining Evolution | National Center for Science Education, accessed May 14, 2025, https://ncse.ngo/defining-evolution
Etymology of "deadline" by etymonline, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.etymonline.com/word/deadline
Why Are They Called Deadlines? - Wonderopolis, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.wonderopolis.org/wonder/why-are-they-called-deadlines
Exploring Cultural Differences in Language Meaning: The Intriguing World of Semantics, accessed May 14, 2025, https://tcllab.org/exploring-cultural-differences-in-language-meaning-the-intriguing-world-of-semantics/
www.michiganpublic.org, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.michiganpublic.org/arts-culture/2013-10-27/the-changing-meanings-of-nice-and-silly#:~:text=Originally%2C%20nice%20was%20borrowed%20from,changed%20to%20precise%20about%20reputation.
Etymology of "nice" by etymonline, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.etymonline.com/word/nice
Etymology of "silly" by etymonline, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.etymonline.com/word/silly
Etymology of "awful" by etymonline, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.etymonline.com/word/awful
Why Is "Knight" Spelled Like That? (Essential Etymologies) - Parchment Lore, accessed May 14, 2025, https://parchmentlore.com/knight-etymology/
Etymology of "knight" by etymonline, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.etymonline.com/word/knight
www.etymonline.com, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.etymonline.com/word/salary#:~:text=late%2013c.%2C%20salarie%2C%20%22,for%20the%20purchase%20of%20salt%22%20%5B
Etymology of "salary" by etymonline, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.etymonline.com/word/salary
Astrology vs. Astronomy: Exploring the Meaning and Difference | Merriam-Webster, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/is-it-astrology-or-astronomy
Disaster - aster means star and dis - against or negative connotation. In ancient times, people believed that destiny of human being is decided by stars. So if any misfortune or anything happens then it is due to the fact that star is against. : r/etymology - Reddit, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/etymology/comments/10qgzjq/disaster_aster_means_star_and_dis_against_or/
Etymology of "disaster" by etymonline, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.etymonline.com/word/disaster
www.merriam-webster.com, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/clue#:~:text=The%20word%20clue%20was%20originally,way%20out%20of%20a%20maze.
CLUE Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/clue
Etymology of "clue" by etymonline, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.etymonline.com/word/clue
Etymology of "enthusiasm" by etymonline, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.etymonline.com/word/enthusiasm
Etymology of "sinister" by etymonline, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.etymonline.com/word/sinister
www.reddit.com, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/etymology/comments/1i3oodd/japanese_kowai_and_kawaii_connection/#:~:text=Modern%20Japanese%20kawaii%20is%20from,attested%20from%20the%20early%201100s.
Exploring the True Meaning of Kawaii - FutureLearn, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/intro-to-japanese-subculture/0/steps/23571
(PDF) How the Japanese Term Kawaii Is Perceived Outside of Japan: A Study in Israel, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335120965_How_the_Japanese_Term_Kawaii_Is_Perceived_Outside_of_Japan_A_Study_in_Israel
From a Word to a Commercial Power : A Brief Introduction to the Kawaii Aesthetic in Contemporary Japan, accessed May 14, 2025, https://ir.library.osaka-u.ac.jp/repo/ouka/all/73599/irjs_3_013.pdf
italiansintogasayingitsallgreektome.wordpress.com, accessed May 14, 2025, https://italiansintogasayingitsallgreektome.wordpress.com/2017/10/23/virtus-virtu-and-virtual-reality-the-case-for-an-etymological-missing-link/#:~:text=The%20Latin%20word%20virtus%2C%20drawing,desirable%20in%20a%20man%20%E2%80%93%20ie.
Virtue - Wikipedia, accessed May 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtue
virtus - Wiktionary, the free dictionary, accessed May 14, 2025, https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/virtus
www.merriam-webster.com, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/zeitgeist#:~:text=In%20German%2C%20such%20a%20spirit,referring%20to%20a%20noisy%20ghost.)
ZEITGEIST Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/zeitgeist
Etymology of "zeitgeist" by etymonline, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.etymonline.com/word/zeitgeist
1. definition, principles, and philosophy of guanxi - World Scientific Publishing, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/9789811210556_0001
Two Diverging Roads: A Semantic Network Analysis of Chinese Social Connection (“Guanxi”) on Twitter - Frontiers, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/digital-humanities/articles/10.3389/fdigh.2017.00011/full
Guanxi - Wikipedia, accessed May 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guanxi
Etymology of "travail" by etymonline, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.etymonline.com/word/travail
The term for work in French "Travailler" and spanish "Trabajar" come from an ancient latin word "Tripalium" which is an ancient torture device. Look it up im not making stuff up : r/antiwork - Reddit, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/antiwork/comments/m056af/the_term_for_work_in_french_travailler_and/
Last name BOESE: origin and meaning - Geneanet, accessed May 14, 2025, https://en.geneanet.org/surnames/BOESE
My German last name means evil man? - Reddit, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/German/comments/1251hon/my_german_last_name_means_evil_man/
Corpus Linguistics | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/language-and-linguistics/corpus-linguistics
Corpus linguistics - Wikipedia, accessed May 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_linguistics
Corpora and historical linguistics, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fss/courses/ling/corpus/Corpus4/4HIST.HTM
Corpora and Historical Texts | Duke Center for Firearms Law, accessed May 14, 2025, https://firearmslaw.duke.edu/2021/07/corpora-and-historical-texts
What Is Natural Language Processing (NLP) & How Does It Work? - Levity.ai, accessed May 14, 2025, https://levity.ai/blog/how-natural-language-processing-works
aclanthology.org, accessed May 14, 2025, https://aclanthology.org/W14-0602.pdf
Towards Computational Lexical Semantic Change Detection | University of Gothenburg, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.gu.se/en/research/towards-computational-lexical-semantic-change-detection
[2404.16341] PILA: A Historical-Linguistic Dataset of Proto-Italic and Latin - arXiv, accessed May 14, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16341
An Examination of the Statistical Laws of Semantic Change in Clinical Notes - PMC, accessed May 14, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8378619/
U of T study uses algorithms to predict how word meanings change ..., accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.utoronto.ca/news/u-t-study-uses-algorithms-predict-how-word-meanings-change-over-time
SemEval-2020 Task 1: Unsupervised Lexical Semantic Change Detection - arXiv, accessed May 14, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.11464
Survey in Characterization of Semantic Change - arXiv, accessed May 14, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2402.19088v1
No comments:
Post a Comment