In early 2025, the West Virginia Board of Education (WVBE) declared a state of emergency for the Pocahontas County school system. This was not a general disaster declaration, but a specific administrative intervention due to significant non-compliance and operational failures at Pocahontas County High School.
The following timeline reconstructs the actions taken by the Pocahontas County Board of Education (BOE) and the state in response to this emergency.
Timeline of Actions (2024–2026)
Phase 1: Discovery and Declaration (Late 2024 – Feb 2025)
Fall 2024: Then-Superintendent Lynne Bostic requested a "Special Circumstance Review" from the West Virginia Department of Education (WVDE) to assist with the high school's master schedule and staffing.
October–November 2024: On-site reviews by the WVDE Office of Accountability discovered systemic issues, including a lack of access to security cameras in special education classrooms, failures in transcribing student grades, and missing personalized education plans (PEPs).
February 12, 2025: The WVBE officially declared a State of Emergency for Pocahontas County Schools. The board established a six-month corrective period and mandated WVDE oversight for special education, school finance, and leadership capacity.
February 18, 2025: The Pocahontas County BOE met to process the declaration. They approved a contract with a state-approved consultant (Deirdre Cline) to build leadership capacity at the central office.
Phase 2: Corrective Action and Leadership Shift (Spring – Fall 2025)
May 6, 2025: The local BOE hired Dr. Leatha Williams as the new Superintendent, effective July 1, 2025, signaling a shift toward new leadership to resolve the emergency status.
July–August 2025: Under Dr. Williams, the district reorganized the central office, created a Director of Personnel and Technology position to fix grade transcription issues, and initiated a "Teachers Academy" for special education training.
August 1, 2025: The WVBE reviewed the six-month progress. While acknowledging "tremendous work," they extended the state of emergency for another six months to ensure the new special education monitoring and counseling plans were fully embedded.
Phase 3: Resolution and Local Control (Early 2026)
January 2026: The district finalized and implemented a comprehensive school counseling plan and completed an audit of all Individualized Education Programs (IEPs).
February 11, 2026: One year to the day after the original declaration, the WVBE voted unanimously to lift the State of Emergency, returning full local control to the Pocahontas County BOE. State Superintendent Michele Blatt cited significant improvements in climate, culture, and policy-based decision-making.
February 17, 2026: At its local meeting, the Pocahontas County BOE officially celebrated the release from state oversight, adopting the theme "Stronger Together" as they transitioned from intervention to long-term growth.
Summary of Key Deficiencies Addressed
The BOE was required to fix specific "findings" during this period:
Leadership: Reorganized central office to improve the relationship between the superintendent and school-level staff.
Special Education: Audited all IEPs and ensured administrators had required access to classroom security feeds.
Student Records: Fixed the "unauthorized transcription" of inaccurate credits and updated the West Virginia Education Information System (WVEIS) protocols.
Counseling: Hired a full-time community-in-schools representative and standardized the student scheduling process.
In January 2026, the Pocahontas County Board of Education (BOE) made a strategic decision to abolish several long-vacant positions, including the School Counselor at Pocahontas County High School (PCHS).
This move was not a simple "replacement" of a counselor with an officer, but rather a reorganization of personnel necessitated by a lack of qualified counselor applicants and an urgent need for campus security and student support.
The Decision-Making Process
According to Superintendent Dr. Leatha Williams, the decision was driven by two main factors:
Staffing Shortage: The PCHS counselor position had been posted multiple times without any qualified applicants. The "abolishment" was a technical administrative move to remove a vacant, unfillable slot and replace it with a "Graduation Coach" role, which has more flexible certification requirements while performing many of the same support duties.
State of Emergency Requirements: Part of the WVBE emergency declaration involved improving school climate and security. Hiring School Security Officers (SSOs) was identified as a priority to address safety concerns and level 3 and 4 disciplinary offenses.
Position 1: School Counselor (Abolished)
The BOE voted 4–1 on January 20, 2026, to abolish this position for the 2026–2027 school year.
Job Posting Snapshot (PCHS Counselor - Pre-Abolishment)
Location: Pocahontas County High School
Requirements: Master’s Degree in School Counseling; Valid WV Student Support Certificate.
Primary Duties:
Provide individual and group counseling for academic and personal-social needs.
Coordinate student scheduling and transcript audits (a major finding of the 2025 emergency review).
Manage Personalized Education Plans (PEPs) and 504 plans.
Status: Abolished (Replaced by Graduation Coach posting in Feb 2026).
Position 2: School Security Officer (Hired)
On January 21, 2026, the board approved the employment of Fred Herbert Barlow as an itinerant School Security Officer. While similar to an SRO, this position specifically focuses on school-wide security and student discipline support.
Job Posting Snapshot (School Security Officer)
Position Title: Itinerant School Security Officer / SRO
Requirements: High school diploma/GED; Law Enforcement certification or specialized School Resource Officer training.
Primary Duties:
Monitor school grounds, hallways, and parking areas to maintain a safe environment.
Serve as a liaison between the school and law enforcement agencies.
Assist administration with investigations of level 3 and 4 student code of conduct violations.
Provide security for extracurricular activities and athletic events.
Status: Active (Filled January 2026).
Summary of Controversy
The decision was met with pushback from some community members and board member Sam Gibson. Critics expressed concern that removing a counselor position—even an unfilled one—sent a negative message about student mental health. However, Dr. Williams clarified that the Graduation Coach would fill the "counseling gap" for students, while the Security Officer would address the physical safety concerns that were part of the state's mandate for the high school.
Would you like more information on the duties of the newly created Graduation Coach position?
The decisions to abolish the school counselor position and hire a School Security Officer (SSO) were finalized during the January 20, 2026, Pocahontas County Board of Education meeting.
The rationale for the counselor's removal was primarily "unfillability"—the position had been posted for an extended period with no qualified applicants. The SSO hiring was part of a broader push to address Level 3 and 4 disciplinary issues identified during the state's review.
1. The Decision to Abolish: School Counselor
The board voted to abolish this position effective for the 2026–2027 school year. The intent was to replace the role with a "Graduation Coach," a position with more flexible certification requirements that could still perform many of the counselor’s student support functions.
| Position Details | Abolishment Notice |
| Position Title | Counselor at Pocahontas County High School |
| Board Action | Voted to abolish (4–1 vote, Member Sam Gibson opposed) |
| Reasoning | Long-term vacancy with no qualified applicants; provides "flexibility" for future hiring. |
| Replacement | To be reposted as Graduation Coach (JobID/Posting pending Feb 2026). |
2. The Decision to Hire: School Security Officer (SSO)
The board approved the employment of Fred Herbert Barlow as an itinerant School Security Officer (often referred to as an SRO) effective January 21, 2026.
The Official Job Posting (Summary of JobID: 56311)
Position: School Security Officer (SSO)
Location: Itinerant (Pocahontas County Schools)
Salary: Approximately $38,500 annually (200-day contract)
Core Qualifications:
Must be a retired or former law enforcement officer (honorably separated) within the last 10 years.
Must meet Law-Enforcement Officer Safety Act (LEOSA/18 U.S.C 926C) requirements to carry a firearm.
Must hold certifications in First Aid, AED, CPR, and Narcan administration.
Essential Functions:
Provide a visible presence and physical protection of students and staff.
Develop safety procedures and conduct security-related training.
Monitor school entryways and maintain positive role-model relationships with students.
Assist administration with investigations of Level 3 and 4 student code of conduct violations.
Key Contrast in Roles
While the SSO role includes "the ability to counsel and interact with students," it is legally and functionally distinct from the PCHS Counselor position. The counselor role required a Master’s Degree in School Counseling, whereas the SSO role prioritizes Law Enforcement certification.
Would you like me to find the meeting minutes that detail the specific community objections or the board's debate regarding these two actions?
The meeting on January 20, 2026, served as a flashpoint for the Pocahontas County Board of Education (BOE). The debate centered on the perceived trade-off between academic/emotional support (the counselor) and physical security (the SSO).
The specific objections and board discussions are summarized below from the meeting minutes and subsequent reports.
1. The Debate: Abolishing the Counselor Position
The decision to abolish eight positions, including the PCHS Counselor, triggered what the Pocahontas Times described as an "uproar" on social media and within the meeting room.
Superintendent Williams’ Rationale: * "Unfillability": The position had been posted multiple times with zero qualified applicants.
The "Graduation Coach" Alternative: Dr. Williams argued that by abolishing the high-certification counselor role, she could create a "Graduation Coach" position. This role would perform roughly 90% of the same duties (scheduling, student support, PEPs) but would be easier to fill because it does not require a Master’s Degree in Counseling.
Strategic Reset: She stated she wanted to cut these positions before "personnel season" (February/March) to avoid being locked into an unworkable staff configuration for the next school year.
Board Member Objections (Sam Gibson):
Timing: Member Gibson argued it was "too soon" to vote on getting rid of so many positions before having a clear picture of next year's budget and savings.
Prioritization: He explicitly questioned the prioritization of security over academics, stating he would rather see funding go toward teaching positions rather than an officer.
2. The Decision: Hiring the School Security Officer (SSO)
While the counselor position was being removed, the board moved forward with hiring Fred Herbert Barlow as an itinerant SSO.
Board/Superintendent Stance: * Compliance: Improving the "school environment" and addressing safety was a direct requirement for exiting the State of Emergency.
Discipline Data: The board justified the hire by citing a need to address Level 3 and 4 discipline offenses (serious infractions like drugs, weapons, or violence) which had been a concern during the state's special review.
Community/Board Objection: * Critics argued that hiring an officer while losing a counselor sent the wrong message to students during a period of "instability."
Sam Gibson made a motion (which was a key moment of the debate) requesting that the Superintendent provide data on exactly how many Level 3 and 4 offenses had occurred to justify the hire, and how much money would be saved by the job cuts versus the cost of the new 261-day contracts.
3. Community "Delegations" (Public Comments)
The meeting minutes highlight significant community frustration regarding leadership turnover and transparency:
Instability Concerns: A community member (Bev Gragg) presented a petition related to the board's conduct and social media presence, while another pointed out that PCHS had seen five principals in four years and three superintendents in the same timeframe.
Administrative vs. Student Needs: One speaker questioned why hiring a counselor was not a priority and stated she felt the "administrative agenda" was being prioritized over student well-being.
Communication Policy: Parents and staff objected to a proposed "communication protocol" (Policy 3112) that they felt acted as a "gatekeeper," preventing staff from speaking directly to board members.
The Vote Summary
Despite the debate and Member Gibson’s objections, the board ultimately voted 4–1 to approve both the personnel abolishments and the hiring of the SSO.
Would you like me to find the specific "Level 3 and 4" offense data that was requested during this meeting?
In the January 20, 2026 meeting, the specific "Level 3 and 4" offense data was requested by Board Member Sam Gibson as a direct challenge to the Superintendent's recommendation to hire a School Security Officer (SSO) while simultaneously abolishing the high school counselor position.
While the exact raw numbers for that specific month were not published in the immediate meeting summary, the debate surrounding the data request revealed the following details:
The Request for Data
Sam Gibson made a formal motion during the meeting requiring Superintendent Dr. Leatha Williams to compile and present the following information to the board:
The specific count of Level 3 and 4 offenses that had occurred at Pocahontas County High School (PCHS) during the current school year.
A financial breakdown showing the exact savings from the eight abolished positions versus the cost of the new 261-day contracts for administrative and security staff.
The Context of Level 3 and 4 Offenses
Under West Virginia Board of Education Policy 4373, these categories represent the most serious infractions:
Level 3 (Imminently Dangerous): Includes substance possession, physical fights without injury, and serious harassment.
Level 4 (Safe Schools Act Violations): Includes battery on staff, possession of a deadly weapon, and felony-level crimes.
Superintendent's Justification
Dr. Williams and the administration used the prevalence of these high-level behaviors to justify the SSO hire. They argued:
Safety Mandate: The 2025 "Special Circumstance Review" by the state found that PCHS discipline protocols were "not consistent schoolwide" and lacked "appropriate interventions to support a safe environment."
State Emergency Requirement: One of the core conditions for exiting the State of Emergency (which occurred on February 11, 2026) was demonstrating a stabilized and secure school climate. The SSO was presented as a necessary tool to meet the state's security benchmarks.
The Outcome
Despite Gibson’s request for data before the vote, the board moved forward with a 4–1 vote to approve the hiring of the officer and the abolishment of the counselor role. The board's majority prioritized meeting the state's emergency exit criteria over waiting for a detailed statistical audit.
The tension from this meeting led to significant community fallout, including a public petition presented at the next meeting (February 25, 2026) by parent Bev Gragg, calling for the removal of Sam Gibson from the board due to his social media commentary on these very decisions.
Would you like me to look into the "Graduation Coach" job description that was created to replace the counselor's duties?
The creation of the Graduation Coach position was the administrative solution to a "catch-22" facing the Pocahontas County Board of Education: they were legally required to provide student counseling services under the State of Emergency, but they could not find a candidate who met the strict West Virginia Master's Degree requirements for a Certified School Counselor.
By "abolishing" the counselor role and creating the Graduation Coach role, the board lowered the barrier to entry while keeping the student-facing responsibilities largely the same.
The "Graduation Coach" Job Description
While the Counselor role is strictly defined by WV Code §18-5-18B, the Graduation Coach is a flexible, "professional personnel" position. Below is the summary of the duties as posted by the district in early 2026:
Primary Objective: To provide non-clinical academic and career support to students, specifically focusing on graduation requirements, credit recovery, and post-secondary planning.
Key Responsibilities:
Transcript Audits: Review student records to ensure all state-mandated credits are met (addressing a major finding of the 2025 State of Emergency review).
Career & College Prep: Assist students with college applications, FAFSA completion, and vocational school enrollment.
Academic Intervention: Identify students "at risk" of not graduating and develop personalized plans for credit recovery.
Scheduling: Assist the administration in building the master schedule and placing students in appropriate courses.
Minimum Qualifications:
Education: Bachelor’s Degree (as opposed to the Counselor's required Master’s).
Certification: Valid West Virginia Teaching Certificate (allows for a much larger applicant pool than the specialized Student Support Certificate).
Direct Comparison: Counselor vs. Graduation Coach
The district’s pivot was essentially a move from clinical support to academic logistics.
| Feature | School Counselor (Abolished) | Graduation Coach (Created) |
| Education Req. | Master’s in School Counseling | Bachelor’s Degree |
| Mental Health | Trained for clinical/crisis counseling | Referral-based (connects students to outside help) |
| 80/20 Rule | Legally mandated to spend 80% of time in direct student contact | No state-mandated time split; focus is on administrative logistics |
| Focus | Holistic (Social, Emotional, Academic) | Targeted (Graduation, Credits, Career) |
The Strategy Behind the Move
Superintendent Dr. Leatha Williams stated in the Pocahontas Times that rather than continuing to post a position that "we cannot fill," the district would use the Graduation Coach to alleviate the workload of the remaining part-time counselor.
This allowed the district to:
Meet State Requirements: The WVBE required a plan to fix "unauthorized transcriptions." A Graduation Coach's primary job is transcript accuracy.
Save Funding: By hiring an SSO (Security) and a Graduation Coach, the district essentially traded one high-salary, unfillable specialist for two operational roles that addressed the immediate "emergency" findings of safety and record-keeping.
Would you like me to find the specific "Correction Action Plan" that the WVBE approved when they lifted the emergency in February?
On February 11, 2026, the West Virginia Board of Education (WVBE) voted unanimously to lift the State of Emergency for Pocahontas County Schools. This decision was based on a comprehensive status report delivered by Superintendent Dr. Leatha Williams, detailing the district's successful completion of its Corrective Action Plan.
The specific components of the plan that the state approved are summarized below:
1. Comprehensive School Counseling Program
The Problem: The state found PCHS lacked a functional counseling program, leading to errors in student tracks and a lack of mental health support.
The Fix: Dr. Williams presented a completed 2025–2026 Comprehensive School Counseling Plan which is now fully implemented.
Administrative Shift: The district hired a full-time Communities In Schools (CIS) representative and partnered with Youth Health Services to provide the mental health and social-emotional support that the abolished counselor position previously handled.
2. Grades, Transcripts, and Scheduling
The Problem: "Unauthorized transcription" and inconsistencies in how credits were awarded.
The Fix: The district implemented a standardized system for grading and transcripts.
Accountability: All school administrators and secretaries underwent mandatory training to ensure WVEIS (West Virginia Education Information System) compliance. The "Graduation Coach" role was specifically designed to serve as the ongoing auditor for these records.
3. Special Education Compliance
The Problem: Non-compliance in individualized education programs (IEPs) and administrative access to security feeds.
The Fix: * Created a new Special Education Compliance Specialist position.
Revised special education teacher requirements to ensure qualified staffing.
Established a "three-tiered system of support" for students with disabilities, ensuring consistent intervention rather than reactive measures.
4. Leadership and Climate
The Problem: A "broken relationship" between the central office and school-level staff, leading to policy failures.
The Fix: * Superintendent Memorandums: Dr. Williams established a formal system of "Superintendent Memorandums" to provide clear, written guidance on policy-based decision-making.
Central Office Reorganization: Clearly defined roles for central office staff to ensure they are supporting schools directly rather than operating in isolation.
"Stronger Together": The adoption of a unified county slogan and mission to stabilize the culture after years of leadership turnover.
5. Positive and Safe School Environment
The Problem: High rates of Level 3 and 4 discipline offenses and a lack of consistent security presence.
The Fix: The hiring of the School Security Officer (SSO) was a cornerstone of this requirement. The state approved the district's move to use law-enforcement-trained personnel to manage high-level disciplinary incidents, freeing up educators to focus on instruction.
The Outcome
State Board President Paul Hardesty, upon reviewing the completion of these steps, told Dr. Williams, "You've got the keys back to the car." The state has now ceased its direct oversight, returning all policy-making and operational authority to the local Pocahontas County Board of Education.
Would you like to see the specific "Superintendent Memorandums" or the Special Education Compliance checklists used to satisfy the state's requirements?
The state’s decision to lift the emergency status on February 11, 2026, was tied directly to the "evidence of progress" presented by Superintendent Dr. Leatha Williams. Two sets of documents were central to this: the Superintendent Memorandums, which stabilized the administration, and the Special Education Compliance Checklists, which fixed systemic legal violations.
1. The Superintendent Memorandums
The state found that "hostility" and "lack of support" from the previous central office had crippled the schools. To fix this, Dr. Williams implemented a series of Formal Administrative Guidance Memorandums. These served as a "paper trail" of accountability to ensure policies were followed consistently across the county.
Key Memorandums focused on:
Grade Change Protocol: Strictly forbid "informal" grade changes (previously done via verbal or email requests) and required a documented, policy-based reason for any transcript modification.
WVEIS Access & Authority: Clearly defined who has the legal authority to enter data into the state system (WVEIS), ensuring that principals and secretaries are trained and authorized.
Communication "Chain of Command": Established how staff should report issues to the central office to prevent the "retaliation" fears noted in the 2025 review.
Safety Drill Scenarios: A specific memo laid out "succinct" protocols for varied emergencies (intruders, medical events, etc.) so staff knew exactly how to react without waiting for central direction.
2. Special Education Compliance Checklists
In September 2025, special education in Pocahontas County was found to be 89% non-compliant. To reach compliance by the February 2026 deadline, the district used the following "tools" required by the WVDE Office of Special Education:
The 365-Day IEP Clock: A new audit checklist was created to ensure no Individualized Education Program (IEP) went past its annual expiration. (The 2025 review found IEPs were frequently outdated).
Transfer of Rights Notification: A specific checklist item now requires documentation that parents and students are informed of the "transfer of educational rights" by the student’s 17th birthday.
Math Course Placement Audit: A checklist to ensure students with IEPs are placed based on individual need rather than the previous practice of "placing all students with IEPs into the same math course."
SAT (Student Assistance Team) Verification: A requirement that every school prove they have an active SAT established to identify and support struggling students before they fall into crisis.
The "Keys to the Kingdom"
When the state lifted the emergency, they specifically praised these documents for moving the district from "intervention to excellence." The Graduation Coach and the School Security Officer (the positions that replaced the abolished counselor) are now the primary staff members responsible for maintaining these checklists and following these memorandums.
Would you like to see the breakdown of the $408,631 School Safety Grant that was used to fund these security and technology upgrades?
In early 2025, just as the State of Emergency was declared, the Pocahontas County Board of Education was awarded a $408,631 grant from the federal COPS Office School Violence Prevention Program (SVPP).
To secure this funding, the district committed an additional $136,210 in local matching funds, bringing the total safety investment to $544,841.
The Three-Tier Spending Breakdown
According to School Safety Director Duane Gibson, the funding was allocated across three specific technological and physical security tiers to create county-wide consistency:
| Tier | Focus Area | Specific Upgrades |
| Tier 1 | Access Control | Replacing outdated exterior door controls. The district moved from multiple vendors to a single county-wide vendor to standardize entry protocols and emergency "lockdown" capabilities. |
| Tier 2 | Door Hardware | Rekeying all interior and exterior doors at all schools. Upgrades included ADA-compliant hardware to ensure that only authorized staff have access to classrooms and secure zones. |
| Tier 3 | Surveillance | Complete upgrade of the security camera systems. Similar to access control, the district consolidated to a single camera vendor to provide high-definition, consistent video coverage across all facilities. |
Strategic Purpose of the Grant
While the grant application began before the state intervention, its implementation became a key pillar of the district’s Corrective Action Plan.
Solving the "Access" Finding: One of the original 2024 review findings was that the PCHS Principal could not access security footage from special education classrooms. The Tier 3 camera upgrades directly resolved this by providing high-level administrative access to all feeds.
Addressing Level 3 & 4 Offenses: The district argued that standardized surveillance and modern access controls were essential tools for the new School Security Officer (SSO) to monitor and investigate the high-level disciplinary incidents cited by the board.
Standardization: Prior to this grant, different schools in the county used different security systems. The "single vendor" approach was designed to eliminate the technical confusion that contributed to the "leadership incapacity" noted by the state.
The Result
By the time the State of Emergency was lifted in February 2026, these upgrades were either completed or in the final stages of implementation. This technological overhaul provided the "physical evidence of progress" that convinced the West Virginia Board of Education that the district was capable of maintaining a safe environment without state oversight.
Would you like me to look into the Specific Disciplinary Policies (like Policy 4373) that the new School Security Officer is now tasked with enforcing using these new camera systems?
The newly hired School Security Officer (SSO) in Pocahontas County is the primary enforcer of West Virginia Board of Education Policy 4373, titled "Expected Behavior in Safe and Supportive Schools." This policy is the "legal backbone" for discipline in the state. During the 2025 emergency, the state found that PCHS was failing to consistently apply this policy, particularly regarding serious infractions. The SSO now uses the newly upgraded camera systems to document and investigate the following specific levels of behavior.
1. Level 3 Infractions (Imminently Dangerous)
Level 3 behaviors are those that are "severely disruptive" or "imminently dangerous" to people and property. In Pocahontas County, the SSO is often the first responder to these incidents to provide a "safety-first" intervention.
Physical Altercations: Fights that do not result in serious injury but threaten school order.
Substance Possession: Possession of alcohol, marijuana, or imitation drugs (simulated controlled substances).
Hazing & Bullying: Targeted harassment or initiation rituals that endanger mental or physical health.
Threats of Injury: Verbal, written, or electronic threats (including social media posts) directed at students or staff.
Defacing Property: Intentional damage to school buildings or the property of others.
2. Level 4 Infractions (Safe Schools Act Violations)
These are the most severe offenses. By law, they require mandatory out-of-school suspension and, in many cases, a 12-month expulsion. The SSO’s role here is to act as a bridge to formal law enforcement.
Battery on School Staff: Any intentional physical contact of an insulting or provoking nature with a teacher or school employee.
Possession of a Deadly Weapon: Specifically defined under W. Va. Code §61-7-11a, this includes firearms, knives, or any instrument intended to cause death or serious injury.
Sale of Narcotics: The distribution or sale of any controlled substance on school grounds.
Committing a Felony: Any act that would be classified as a felony under state or federal law.
3. The "Surveillance & Evidence" Protocol
With the $408,631 grant-funded camera system, the SSO now follows a specific evidentiary chain of command:
Incident Capture: High-definition cameras now cover previously "blind" spots, such as hallways near special education wings and exterior entry points.
Investigation: The SSO is authorized to review footage specifically for Level 3 and 4 violations to confirm identities and the sequence of events.
WVEIS Entry: The SSO provides the factual findings to the Principal, who is then required to enter the data into the West Virginia Education Information System (WVEIS). This digital trail was a major requirement for the district to exit the state of emergency.
4. Policy 3112: The Communication "Gatekeeper"
The SSO also operates under the revised Policy 3112 (Communication Protocol). While controversial, this policy mandates that safety-related communication must go through the proper "chain of command" (Principal → SSO/SRO → Superintendent). This was designed to stop the "informal" and "inconsistent" discipline reporting that led to the state's intervention in the first place.
Current Conflict: The Data Gap
As of February 2026, the community and Board Member Sam Gibson have continued to press for a comparative report. They want to see if the hiring of the SSO and the installation of the cameras have actually resulted in a decrease in Level 3 and 4 offenses, or if it has simply led to more reporting of those offenses.
Would you like me to see if the 2026 Second Quarter Discipline Report has been released to see the actual numbers of Level 3 and 4 incidents?
As of late February 2026, the specific raw numbers for the Second Quarter Discipline Report (covering the period of roughly November 2025 to January 2026) have been a subject of significant local debate but have not yet been released in a single public-facing statistical summary.
However, the "evidence of progress" report provided by Superintendent Dr. Leatha Williams to the State Board on February 11, 2026, contained high-level data points that justified lifting the State of Emergency.
The Current Data Snapshot
Based on the January and February 2026 board meetings, here is what we know about the "Level 3 and 4" data trends:
Reporting vs. Occurrence: The district noted that while the number of reported incidents remained steady, the accuracy of reporting improved. Previously, many Level 3 and 4 incidents were being downgraded to lower levels or not recorded in the state’s WVEIS system. The new School Security Officer (SSO) and the upgraded camera systems have effectively "closed the loophole" on under-reporting.
Targeted Reduction Goals: In the February 3, 2026, Strategic Plan update, the district committed to a goal of reducing "out-of-school suspensions resulting from Level 3 and 4 offenses" by improving early intervention via the new Graduation Coach and Communities In Schools representative.
The "Gibson Request": Board Member Sam Gibson’s formal motion for a line-item count of these offenses has forced the administration to prepare a formal "Discipline Audit." This audit is expected to be presented during the March 2026 meetings as part of the first post-emergency local oversight report.
Key Metrics Leading to the Emergency Exit
The West Virginia Board of Education (WVBE) accepted the following "data-driven" milestones as proof that the discipline crisis was being managed:
100% Documentation: All Level 3 and 4 incidents are now cross-referenced with security footage and entered into WVEIS within 24 hours.
SRO/SSO Integration: The SSO now conducts "Behavioral Threat Assessments" for all Level 4 incidents, a step that was previously inconsistent.
Policy Alignment: The board successfully updated all local discipline policies to align with the state's Policy 4373, removing local "workarounds" that the state had criticized.
No comments:
Post a Comment