An In-Depth Analysis of School Performance, Systemic Challenges, and Strategic Pathways for Pocahontas County, West Virginia
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the Pocahontas County school district in West Virginia, examining academic performance data, systemic administrative challenges, and the broader socio-economic context. The analysis reveals a complex and paradoxical situation: while 2018 proficiency data shows the district outperforming state averages in key areas, this masks significant internal inconsistencies and is belied by a subsequent "State of Emergency" declaration by the West Virginia Board of Education (WVBE). This declaration stemmed from a Special Circumstance Review that uncovered profound administrative and leadership failures, particularly at the high school level, with serious implications for student outcomes and the district's operational integrity.1
Key findings indicate that county-wide proficiency rates in 2018—41.87% in Mathematics and 40.67% in Reading—obscure extreme performance volatility among the district's five schools.3 While Marlinton Middle School emerged as a high-performing outlier, other schools, particularly at the elementary level, showed significant weaknesses, and critical transition points between school levels appear to be failing. Furthermore, post-pandemic data from the Harvard Education Recovery Scorecard reveals that the district experienced significant learning loss, especially in math, from which it has only partially recovered, erasing any pre-pandemic gains and leaving students more than a grade level behind the national average.4
The root causes of this fragility are detailed in the WVDE's review, which identified a cascade of failures in core functions, including student counseling and planning, data management and scheduling, special education services, and school safety protocols.2 These internal deficiencies are compounded by external headwinds common to rural Appalachian districts: declining enrollment, an antiquated state funding formula, and challenges in recruiting and retaining high-quality educators.5
Despite these severe challenges, the district possesses notable strengths, including strong community partnerships, as evidenced by its Purple Star District recognition and the award-winning Nature's Mountain Classroom program.8 This report concludes with a four-pillar strategic framework for recovery, providing actionable recommendations for the district's new leadership. The pillars focus on: 1) restoring foundational integrity and achieving compliance with state mandates; 2) driving academic recovery through data-driven instruction; 3) rebuilding human capital and professional culture; and 4) cultivating strategic alliances to ensure long-term stability. The current crisis, while severe, presents a critical opportunity to overhaul dysfunctional systems and build a resilient, high-performing educational environment for all students in Pocahontas County.
Section 1: A Quantitative Baseline of Academic Performance in Pocahontas County (2018)
To understand the current state of Pocahontas County Schools (PCS), it is essential to establish a quantitative baseline using the most recent comprehensive dataset available prior to the major disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent declaration of a State of Emergency. The 2018 West Virginia General Summative Assessment (WVGSA) results provide this critical snapshot, revealing a district with overall proficiency rates that, on the surface, appear competitive, yet mask significant and concerning performance variations at the school and grade level.3
1.1 District-Level Proficiency Analysis
In the 2018 academic year, Pocahontas County's overall student proficiency—defined as the percentage of students scoring at the "Meets Standard" or "Exceeds Standard" level—was 41.87% in Mathematics and 40.67% in Reading across all tested grades.3 A closer examination of the full performance distribution reveals that a majority of students were not meeting grade-level expectations.
In Mathematics, 58.13% of students were not proficient. This figure is composed of 27.98% of students who were in the lowest performance category, "Does Not Meet Standard," and an additional 30.16% who were classified as "Partially Meets Standard".3 This indicates that for every two students meeting or exceeding the math standard, nearly three students were falling behind.
The situation in Reading was similar, with 59.33% of students failing to achieve proficiency. This was comprised of 27.18% of students who did not meet the standard and 32.14% who only partially met it.3 These baseline figures are crucial, as they represent the starting point from which the district would face the unprecedented challenges of the pandemic and the internal administrative crises that followed.
1.2 School-by-School Performance Deep Dive
While the district-level averages provide a broad overview, a granular analysis of individual school performance uncovers a landscape of extreme volatility. This variance suggests a lack of systemic coherence in curriculum implementation, instructional quality, and support systems across the district's five schools. The performance of each school tells a distinct story, highlighting both pockets of excellence and areas of profound weakness.
The data in Table 1 reveals several critical patterns:
Hillsboro Elementary School shows a concerning dip in 4th-grade performance, where both math (21.43%) and reading (28.57%) proficiency rates are substantially lower than in the 3rd and 5th grades. This suggests a potential grade-specific instructional or curricular challenge that requires investigation.
Green Bank Elementary-Middle School presents a stark example of the "middle school cliff." While 3rd-grade math proficiency is a robust 64.29%, performance declines sharply through the middle school years, bottoming out at a very low 21.74% in 8th-grade math. This dramatic drop-off points to a significant problem in the middle-grade curriculum or instruction at this specific K-8 school.
Marlinton Elementary School posts the weakest overall results among the district's K-5 schools, with a particularly low 5th-grade math proficiency rate of just 24.49%. This indicates that students are leaving Marlinton Elementary with significant learning gaps, placing a greater burden on the middle school to provide remediation.
Marlinton Middle School stands out as a significant positive outlier. With an overall math proficiency of 51.88% and reading proficiency of 48.12%, it dramatically outperforms not only the district's other schools but also the county and state averages. The consistent strength across all three grade levels, particularly the 56.90% proficiency in 8th-grade math, suggests that highly effective instructional practices and strong leadership were in place at this school in 2018. The success at Marlinton Middle provides a crucial internal benchmark for the district; identifying and replicating these successful practices should be a top priority.
Pocahontas County High School shows 11th-grade proficiency rates of 42.19% in math and 45.31% in reading. While these numbers are not alarmingly low in isolation, they are deeply concerning when viewed in the context of the educational pipeline. The high school should be receiving a well-prepared cohort of students from the high-achieving Marlinton Middle School. The fact that high school proficiency is lower than that of its primary feeder middle school strongly suggests a systemic breakdown at the high school level—a conclusion that is overwhelmingly supported by the subsequent WVDE State of Emergency report.2 This discrepancy points away from issues with student aptitude and directly toward problems with high school curriculum, instruction, and administration.
Section 2: Comparative Analysis: Situating Pocahontas County in a Regional and Temporal Context
While the internal data reveals significant inconsistencies, a comparative analysis is necessary to situate Pocahontas County's performance within the broader landscape of West Virginia education. This involves benchmarking against neighboring counties and the state as a whole, as well as examining longitudinal trends to understand the district's trajectory over time. This analysis reveals that while PCS was performing favorably against state peers before the pandemic, its academic foundation was fragile and could not withstand the combined pressures of the pandemic and internal administrative collapse.
2.1 Benchmarking Against Peers and State (2018)
In the 2018 academic year, Pocahontas County's proficiency rates presented a mixed but generally positive picture when compared to its immediate neighbors and the state average. This context is critical, as it demonstrates that the district was not a chronic underperformer prior to its recent crisis.
As shown in Table 2, Pocahontas County's 2018 math proficiency rate of 41.87% was a significant bright spot. It exceeded the rates of all its geographic neighbors—Greenbrier, Randolph, and Pendleton counties—and was more than 10 percentage points higher than the West Virginia state average of 31.37%.3 This strong relative performance in mathematics suggests the district possessed effective instructional capacity in this core subject.
In reading, the story was different. The county's proficiency rate of 40.67% lagged behind the state average of 45.15% and was also lower than that of Greenbrier County (48.24%) and Pendleton County (49.54%). It did, however, outperform neighboring Randolph County (36.15%).3
The key takeaway from this 2018 benchmark is that Pocahontas County was not, by West Virginia standards, a failing district. Its strength in mathematics was particularly notable. This makes the subsequent administrative collapse and declaration of a State of Emergency all the more striking, suggesting an acute crisis rooted in non-instructional failures rather than a long-term, chronic academic deficit.
2.2 Longitudinal Performance Trends and Post-Pandemic Recovery
Examining the district's performance over time reveals a positive pre-pandemic trajectory that was severely disrupted and has yet to recover, particularly in mathematics. The data from the Harvard Education Recovery Scorecard, which uses a national benchmark, provides a more sobering view of the district's standing and the true depth of its post-pandemic learning loss.4
The pre-pandemic data (2015-2018) shows a district on the rise, especially in math. Proficiency rates climbed steadily from 26.4% in 2015 to 41.9% in 2018, an impressive improvement of over 15 percentage points in just three years.3 Reading proficiency remained more stable during this period. This positive momentum was completely derailed by the pandemic.
The Harvard Scorecard data, which measures student performance in terms of grade levels relative to the 2019 national average, illustrates the severity of the setback.4 In math, Pocahontas County students, who were already -0.81 grade levels behind the national average in 2019, plummeted to -1.41 grade levels behind by 2022. While there has been some recovery to -1.05 by 2024, the district is still further behind than it was before the pandemic, representing a net loss of nearly a quarter of a grade level of learning. In reading, the situation has slightly worsened, moving from -1.23 grade levels behind in 2022 to -1.27 in 2024.
This longitudinal analysis yields two critical conclusions.
First, the district's pre-pandemic gains proved fragile and were not sustained through the disruption, suggesting that the systems in place were not resilient. The administrative chaos at the high school, as documented by the WVDE, undoubtedly hampered any coordinated academic recovery effort and contributed directly to this sustained learning loss.2 Second, there is a stark contradiction between state and national benchmarks. While Pocahontas County may outperform the West Virginia average, its students remain significantly behind their national peers. This context is vital for the Board of Education; the goal cannot simply be to beat the state average. To truly prepare students for post-secondary success, the district must aim to close the gap with national standards of achievement.
Section 3: The State of Emergency: A Diagnosis of Systemic and Administrative Deficiencies
The academic performance data, with its internal inconsistencies and post-pandemic decline, serves as a symptom of a deeper institutional malaise. In February 2025, the West Virginia Board of Education took the extraordinary step of declaring a State of Emergency for Pocahontas County Schools.1 This decision was the culmination of a process that began in the spring of 2024, when the county superintendent requested assistance from the West Virginia Department of Education (WVDE) regarding the high school's master schedule. The subsequent Special Circumstance Review, conducted in October 2024, uncovered "significant concerns" that went far beyond scheduling, revealing a systemic breakdown of core administrative and leadership functions.2 The WVDE's findings paint a picture of a high school in operational crisis, enabled by a lack of district-level oversight and support.
3.1 Analysis of Core Non-Compliance Findings
The WVDE's review was organized into five focus areas. The findings within each area were not isolated incidents but rather interconnected components of a cascading failure.
A thematic analysis of these findings reveals the depth of the crisis:
Failure of Student Guidance and Planning: The absence of a certified school counselor and the complete failure to develop Personal Education Plans (PEPs) represents a catastrophic breakdown of a fundamental high school function.2 This means students were navigating their high school careers without formal guidance on course selection, graduation requirements, or post-secondary planning, directly jeopardizing their futures.
Collapse of Data Management and Academic Administration: The review found that the school's basic operational and data-keeping functions had disintegrated. The failure to prepare a master schedule before the school year began, the reliance on a single, undertrained individual for all WVEIS data entry, and the resulting inaccuracies in student transcripts created a crisis of academic integrity.2 These failures have tangible consequences, potentially impacting college admissions, NCAA eligibility, and scholarship opportunities for students.
Breakdown in Leadership, Communication, and Culture: The WVDE report points to a toxic and dysfunctional organizational culture, characterized by a lack of central office support for school leadership, an absence of a shared mission, a breakdown in the chain of command, and a staff culture of blame rather than collaborative problem-solving.2 This environment makes sustainable improvement nearly impossible, as trust and communication—the prerequisites for any successful reform—were clearly absent.
Compromised School Safety and Security: The findings on inconsistent discipline, the principal's inability to access required security camera footage, an outdated crisis plan, and unsecured access to sensitive student data in WVEIS represent significant legal and safety liabilities for the district.2 These lapses violate both state policy and the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
Systemic Failure in Special Education: The review uncovered what can only be described as a systemic failure to meet the legal and ethical obligations to the district's most vulnerable students. With the county already designated as "Needs Assistance" in special education, the findings of unverified services, lapsed IEPs, a non-functional Student Assistance Team (SAT), and improper student placements are particularly damning.2 These failures not only expose the district to significant legal action but represent a profound moral failing.
The interconnectedness of these issues cannot be overstated. The lack of leadership capacity and data management expertise at the district and school levels created a vacuum where fundamental processes collapsed. This administrative chaos, in turn, made it impossible to implement the very programs—such as a functional counseling department or a multi-tiered system of support for special education—that are designed to ensure student success. While the high school was the epicenter of this crisis, the repeated citations of a lack of central office support and guidance make it clear that this was a district-wide failure of leadership.
Section 4: The Macro-Level Context: Navigating the Headwinds of Rural West Virginia Education
The internal administrative crisis in Pocahontas County did not occur in a vacuum. It unfolded against a backdrop of formidable statewide and regional challenges that disproportionately affect small, rural school districts. Understanding these external pressures—related to funding, human capital, and socio-economics—is crucial for developing realistic and sustainable solutions. The district's internal weaknesses were exacerbated by these powerful macro-level headwinds.
4.1 The Funding Conundrum
Pocahontas County, like many rural districts in West Virginia, faces a severe and worsening financial squeeze. This pressure stems from three primary sources: declining enrollment, an outdated state funding formula, and the fiscal impact of school choice legislation.
Student enrollment in the district has been in steady decline, dropping from 1,074 students in the 2014-2015 school year to just 893 in 2022-2023, a decrease of nearly 17%.5
This trend is critical because West Virginia's school aid formula is primarily driven by student numbers.7 As enrollment falls, so does the allocation of state funds. This creates a difficult situation for rural districts, which have high fixed costs (e.g., building maintenance, transportation across large geographic areas) that do not decrease proportionally with student numbers. This "diseconomy of scale" means that losing even a small number of students can have an outsized negative impact on the budget.11
The state's funding mechanism itself is a major challenge. West Virginia is one of only a handful of states that uses a "resource-based" formula, which allocates funds based on inputs like staffing ratios rather than the specific needs of students.7 This model lacks transparency and flexibility, and it fails to adequately account for the higher per-pupil costs in sparsely populated areas or the additional resources needed to serve students in poverty.7
The financial pressure is further intensified by the state's Hope Scholarship program, an education savings account that diverts public funds to private school tuition and homeschooling expenses.13 As students leave the public system using these vouchers, the district loses the associated state funding, further straining its budget. This has led to school closures and consolidations in other rural counties like Clay and Wetzel, and it represents a significant long-term threat to the financial stability of Pocahontas County.11
4.2 The Human Capital Challenge
A recent survey of local stakeholders identified "recruiting and retaining high quality teachers and administrators" as the single greatest challenge facing Pocahontas County Schools.6 This local concern reflects a statewide crisis. West Virginia suffers from a chronic teacher shortage, with high rates of attrition; 32% of new teachers leave the profession within their first four years.14
Rural districts like Pocahontas are at a particular disadvantage in this competitive environment. They must compete for talent with districts in neighboring states like Virginia and Pennsylvania, which often offer higher salaries.15 Furthermore, the lack of available housing and the professional isolation of a rural setting can make it difficult to attract and keep educators and their families.16 The leadership and cultural failures identified in the WVDE report create a work environment that would actively repel, rather than attract, high-quality professionals, thus compounding an already difficult external challenge. The recent hiring of a new, experienced superintendent, Dr. Leatha Williams, is a crucial first step in addressing this, but reversing years of cultural dysfunction will require sustained effort.18
4.3 The Socio-Economic Landscape
The educational challenges in Pocahontas County cannot be separated from the economic realities of the community it serves. West Virginia has one of the highest rates of child poverty in the United States, with research consistently demonstrating a powerful correlation between poverty and lower educational outcomes.19 More than half of all public school students in the state come from low-income families.22
Children living in poverty are more likely to face significant barriers to learning before they ever enter the classroom. These can include food insecurity, housing instability, lack of access to healthcare, and higher levels of stress and trauma, all of which can impair cognitive development and school readiness.23 The district's efforts to mitigate these challenges, such as providing no-cost breakfast and lunch through the Community Eligibility Provision and offering a summer meals program, are therefore not ancillary services but core components of its educational mission.26
These three external factors—funding pressures, recruitment difficulties, and high poverty rates—create a vicious cycle. Declining enrollment reduces funding, which limits the ability to offer competitive salaries, which makes it harder to recruit teachers, which can lead to lower academic quality, which in turn can drive more families away from the public system. This cycle places immense strain on the district's capacity to serve its students, particularly those with the greatest needs.
Section 5: Strategic Pathways to Recovery and Excellence
While the convergence of internal administrative failures and external socio-economic pressures presents a formidable challenge, Pocahontas County Schools possesses significant inherent strengths and has demonstrated a capacity for innovation. The State of Emergency, though a crisis, can serve as a powerful catalyst for change, providing the mandate and momentum for a comprehensive overhaul of dysfunctional systems. A successful path forward requires a dual approach: first, rigorously addressing the compliance issues to restore foundational integrity, and second, strategically leveraging the district's unique assets to build a resilient and excellent educational system for the future.
5.1 Leveraging Inherent Strengths and Recent Successes
Despite the crisis at the administrative level, the district is not without considerable assets that can be foundational to its recovery.
Strong Community and Business Partnerships: The district has proven its ability to build fruitful relationships. Its repeated designation as a Purple Star District for its robust support of military-connected students and their families demonstrates a deep commitment to student well-being.9 More impressively, the district's partnership with Nature's Mountain Classroom won the 2025 West Virginia School-Business Partnership of the Year Award. This immersive, place-based learning program, which provides outdoor experiences for every student from K-12, brought not only statewide recognition but also a $25,000 award package.8 These partnerships are not just accolades; they are tangible assets that enhance the student experience and demonstrate a community invested in its schools.
Pockets of Instructional Excellence: The presence of dedicated and recognized educators within the district points to a strong instructional core that has persisted despite administrative turmoil. The district employs a Math Coach, Joanna Burt Kinderman, who was recently featured in the national publication Education Week for innovative professional development, and a middle school teacher, Sherman Taylor, who was selected by the WVDE to serve as a panelist for the national Praxis® test.26 These individuals represent a valuable internal resource for leading professional learning and driving academic improvement from the ground up.
New, Experienced Leadership: The Board of Education's decision to hire Dr. Leatha Williams, an administrator with extensive experience in technology, assessment, and accountability from Braxton County Schools, as the new superintendent is the most critical step toward recovery.18 This change in leadership provides a clean slate and an opportunity to implement new systems, rebuild trust, and establish a culture of competence and high expectations.
5.2 A Four-Pillar Framework for Comprehensive Recovery
To move from crisis to stability and ultimately to excellence, the new superintendent and the Board of Education should adopt a strategic framework built on four key pillars.
Pillar 1: Restoring Foundational Integrity and Achieving Compliance
The immediate and non-negotiable priority is to address the findings of the WVDE's Special Circumstance Review and exit the State of Emergency.
Action Items:
Execute Corrective Actions: Systematically and transparently execute every corrective action mandated in the WVDE report.2 This includes appointing a certified school counselor, developing a functional Student Assistance Team (SAT), and correcting all special education files.
Ensure Data Integrity: Conduct a full, independent audit of all Pocahontas County High School student transcripts to identify and correct errors. Mandate intensive WVEIS training for all administrators and relevant staff to ensure competence in scheduling, grade transcription, and data management.
Codify Procedures: Develop and formally adopt clear, written board policies for core functions, including grade changes, student discipline, and data security, to eliminate ambiguity and ensure consistent application.
Pillar 2: Driving Academic Recovery and Instructional Coherence
With a stable foundation, the focus must shift to aggressively closing the learning gaps identified in the performance data.
Action Items:
Targeted School Improvement: Use the school-level data from this report (Table 1) to develop data-driven School Improvement Plans. These plans must specifically address the "middle school cliff" at Green Bank and the critical elementary-to-middle and middle-to-high school transition points.
Leverage Internal Expertise: Empower the district's expert Math Coach to lead a K-12 initiative to ensure vertical alignment of the math curriculum and disseminate best practices, particularly drawing from the successes observed at Marlinton Middle School.
Implement Support Systems: Fully implement the Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) framework, as required by the WVDE, to provide targeted academic and behavioral interventions for all students, ensuring that the needs of both struggling and advanced learners are met.2
Pillar 3: Rebuilding Human Capital and Professional Culture
Long-term success depends on attracting, developing, and retaining high-quality educators and leaders.
Action Items:
Support Leadership: Implement a robust, high-quality mentorship and induction program for new teachers and, most critically, for the principal at the high school, as mandated by the WVDE report.2
Strategic Recruitment: Develop a multi-faceted recruitment strategy that actively pursues candidates through programs like "Teachers Ascend into West Virginia" 30 and utilizes federal Title II funds specifically for recruitment and retention initiatives.31
Cultivate a Positive Culture: The new leadership must intentionally build a supportive, non-retaliatory professional culture that fosters collaboration and shared ownership for student success, directly addressing the top concern identified by community stakeholders.6
Pillar 4: Cultivating Strategic Alliances and Ensuring Financial Stability
The district must proactively manage its external environment to ensure long-term viability.
Action Items:
Expand Partnerships: Build on the success of the Nature's Mountain Classroom partnership to seek new collaborations with local businesses and organizations that can provide unique learning opportunities and alternative funding streams.
Pursue Grant Funding: Aggressively pursue competitive grants for key needs, following the successful models of securing the COPS grant for school safety and the MIP grant for facilities improvement at Marlinton Middle School.26
Advocate for Policy Change: Engage with state legislators and policy organizations to advocate for a modernization of the West Virginia school aid formula. The district should argue for a student-centered model that better accounts for the higher per-pupil costs and poverty-related needs of rural districts.7
Conclusion
The Pocahontas County school district stands at a critical juncture. The declaration of a State of Emergency has laid bare severe, systemic failures in leadership and administration that have jeopardized student outcomes and the operational integrity of the district. The challenges are profound, compounded by the external pressures of declining enrollment, an inequitable state funding system, and the pervasive impact of rural poverty.
However, this moment of crisis is also a moment of opportunity. The problems identified by the WVDE, while serious, are fundamentally solvable. They are not issues of student capability or intractable social ills, but rather failures of process, policy, and leadership. The arrival of a new, experienced superintendent, combined with the clear mandate for reform provided by the state's intervention, creates the conditions for a genuine transformation.
The path forward requires a disciplined, two-pronged approach. First, the district must pursue the immediate, non-negotiable task of executing the WVDE's corrective action plan to restore foundational integrity and exit the State of Emergency. This is the work of stabilization. Second, it must simultaneously engage in the long-term, strategic work of building a resilient and excellent educational system.
This involves leveraging its unique assets—its strong community partnerships, its pockets of instructional excellence, and its unparalleled natural setting—to create a compelling identity that can attract families and high-quality educators.
By focusing on the four pillars of foundational integrity, academic recovery, human capital development, and strategic alliances, Pocahontas County can move beyond crisis management. With unified commitment from the Board of Education, the new leadership, and the community, the district can transform this challenging chapter into a turning point, building a future where every student is provided with the support and opportunity to succeed.
Works cited
WV Board of Ed. Receives County Updates and Harvard Recovery Scorecard Overview, accessed June 18, 2025, https://wvde.us/wv-board-of-ed-receives-county-updates-and-harvard-recovery-scorecard-overview/
SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCE ON-SITE REVIEW REPORT - WVDE, accessed June 18, 2025, https://wvde.us/sites/default/files/2025-02/Special%20Circumstance%20Review%20Pocahontas%20County%20High%20School.pdf
Latest Total Pop 2015-2018 4Year.xls
Pocahontas County Schools, WV - Education Recovery Scorecard, accessed June 18, 2025, https://educationrecoveryscorecard.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/report_WV_5401140_pocahontas-county-schools.pdf
Pocahontas County Schools, West Virginia - Ballotpedia, accessed June 18, 2025, https://ballotpedia.org/Pocahontas_County_Schools,_West_Virginia
BOE learns what stakeholders think - Pocahontas Times, accessed June 18, 2025, https://pocahontastimes.com/boe-learns-what-stakeholders-think/
West Virginia's Historic K-12 Finance Reform - RealClearEducation, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.realcleareducation.com/articles/2025/03/05/west_virginias_historic_k-12_finance_reform_1095714.html
Pocahontas County Schools' Nature's Mountain Classroom Wins First-Ever WV School-Business Partnership of the Year Awards Program, accessed June 18, 2025, https://boe.pocahontas.k12.wv.us/o/pcs/article/2222876
Pocahontas County Schools recognized as Purple Star District, accessed June 18, 2025, https://pocahontastimes.com/pocahontas-county-schools-recognized-as-purple-star-district/
Executive Summary Page 1 of 1 West Virginia Department of Education Office of School Operations & Finance, accessed June 18, 2025, https://sba.wv.gov/agenda/SiteAssets/Pages/Current-Agenda/ATTACHMENT_S.pdf
How the School Choice Agenda Harms Rural Students - Center for American Progress, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.americanprogress.org/article/how-the-school-choice-agenda-harms-rural-students/
More school funding needed in rural WV | News, Sports, Jobs - The Intermountain, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.theintermountain.com/opinion/columnists/2025/03/more-school-funding-needed-in-rural-wv/
Americans for Prosperity pushing for changes to West Virginia education, healthcare, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.newsandsentinel.com/news/local-news/2025/02/americans-for-prosperity-pushing-for-changes-to-west-virginia-education-healthcare/
ADDRESSING THE SHORTAGE - WVDE, accessed June 18, 2025, https://wvde.us/sites/default/files/2024/04/TeachWV-Addressing-Shortage-Report.pdf
Education Committees Focus On Regional Issues Of Extremely Rural Schools, Locality Pay - West Virginia Public Broadcasting, accessed June 18, 2025, https://wvpublic.org/education-committees-focus-on-regional-issues-of-extremely-rural-schools-locality-pay/
Teacher shortage in rural West Virginia worsens as schools struggle to attract educators, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLVbqwcqW4A
Why World Language Teachers Stay: Teacher Retention in West Virginia, Challenges and Opportunities - ERIC, accessed June 18, 2025, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1466505.pdf
BOE Selects Williams As New PCS Superintendent - Pocahontas County Schools, accessed June 18, 2025, https://boe.pocahontas.k12.wv.us/article/2203574
Reducing Poverty Can Improve Educational Outcomes - West Virginia Center on Budget & Policy, accessed June 18, 2025, https://wvpolicy.org/reducing-poverty-can-improve-educational-outcomes/
Poverty Can't Be Ignored When It Comes To Education - West Virginia Center on Budget & Policy, accessed June 18, 2025, https://wvpolicy.org/poverty-cant-be-ignored-when-it-comes-to-education/
Poverty in Schools: How It Affects Learning and School Performance - Campus Insider, accessed June 18, 2025, https://insider.augusta.edu/poverty-in-schools/
K-12 Education and the 2025 Legislative Session: Much Talk But Little Meaningful Action - West Virginia Center on Budget & Policy, accessed June 18, 2025, https://wvpolicy.org/k-12-education-and-the-2025-legislative-session-much-talk-but-little-meaningful-action/
Communities In Schools | West Virginia Department of Education, accessed June 18, 2025, https://wvde.us/student-support-wellness/communities-schools
Explore Children in Poverty in West Virginia | AHR - America's Health Rankings, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.americashealthrankings.org/explore/measures/ChildPoverty/WV
Child Poverty in West Virginia - WVU School of Public Health, accessed June 18, 2025, https://publichealth.hsc.wvu.edu/media/6148/wv-child-poverty-report-february-19-2013-wvcbp-ted-boettner.pdf
News | Pocahontas County Schools, accessed June 18, 2025, https://boe.pocahontas.k12.wv.us/news
Live Feed - Pocahontas County Schools, accessed June 18, 2025, https://boe.pocahontas.k12.wv.us/live-feed
Pocahontas County Schools' Nature's Mountain Classroom wins first-ever WV School-Business Partnership of the Year Awards Program, accessed June 18, 2025, https://pocahontastimes.com/pocahontas-county-schools-natures-mountain-classroom-wins-first-ever-wv-school-business-partnership-of-the-year-awards-program/
News | Marlinton Middle School, accessed June 18, 2025, https://mms.pocahontas.k12.wv.us/news
Teachers from across US invited to teach, live and play in West Virginia - WVU Today, accessed June 18, 2025, https://wvutoday.wvu.edu/stories/2024/03/13/teachers-from-across-us-invited-to-teach-live-and-play-in-west-virginia
ESEA Funds - Teach WV, accessed June 18, 2025, https://teachwv.com/resources/esea-funds/
BOE receives update on state of emergency progress - Pocahontas Times, accessed June 18, 2025, https://pocahontastimes.com/boe-receives-update-on-state-of-emergency-progress/
Bill Text: WV HB3394 | 2025 | Regular Session | Introduced - LegiScan, accessed June 18, 2025, https://legiscan.com/WV/text/HB3394/2025
No comments:
Post a Comment