-----------------------
During the Civil War, Huntersville's position at the junction of key mountain turnpikes made it a prime staging ground and winter cantonment for Confederate forces in western Virginia. General William W. Loring established massive commissary, quartermaster, and ordnance depots in the town, requisitioning the commercial stores, hotels, and warehouses that had been rebuilt following the 1852 fire. Consequently, federal commanders targeted Huntersville repeatedly to sever supply lines feeding Confederate garrisons in the Greenbrier Valley and Allegheny Highlands.
The Raid of January 3, 1862 (Milroy’s Strike)
The first major blow against Huntersville’s supply infrastructure occurred in midwinter, commanded by Union Brigadier General Robert H. Milroy, operating out of his mountain base at Cheat Summit.
- Expeditionary Force: Milroy dispatched Major George Webster with a combined detachment comprising the 25th Ohio Infantry, the 2nd West Virginia Infantry (initially organized as the 2nd Virginia Infantry, U.S.), and Brackett’s cavalry detachment.
- Skirmish at Huntersville: Approaching along the snow-covered Huttonsville–Warm Springs turnpike corridor, the federal forces encountered Confederate pickets and cavalry under Colonel William L. Jackson (a cousin of "Stonewall" Jackson) guarding the western gap. Following a sharp skirmish, Confederate defenders were driven out toward Warm Springs, abandoning their storehouses.
- Destruction of Depots and Rebuilt Stores:
- Provisions Burned: Federal troops systematically set fire to the Confederate military storehouses, incinerating estimated supplies consisting of 350 barrels of flour, 30,000 pounds of salt bacon, beef, coffee, sugar, clothing, and blankets.
- Commercial Facilities: Several mercantile establishments and outbuildings requisitioned for military stockpiling were fired along with the military storehouses.
- Depot Loss Value: Contemporary federal dispatches valued the destroyed Confederate stores between $30,000 and $50,000.
- Withdrawal: Having achieved their objective and lacking wagons to transport the vast stores over winter roads, Milroy’s detachment burned the commissary buildings to the ground and withdrew toward the Greenbrier River and Cheat Mountain.
Averell’s Raids and the 1863 Campaign
By the summer and autumn of 1863, Union Brigadier General William W. Averell launched aggressive mounted cavalry operations aimed at severing the Virginia and Tennessee Railroad and clearing Confederate commands under Generals John Echols and William L. Jackson from the Greenbrier Valley.
1861-1862: REQUISITION JAN 1862: MILROY'S EXPEDITION NOV 1863: AVERELL'S CAMPAIGN
+-----------------------+ +----------------------------+ +---------------------------+
| Rebuilt 1850s stores | | Union force enters town; | | Averell sweeps through on |
| convert to Confederate| ======> | fires primary commissary & | ===> | march to Droop Mountain; |
| food/clothing depot. | | quartermaster storehouses. | | final outbuildings fired. |
+-----------------------+ +----------------------------+ +---------------------------+
August 1863 Sweep
During the Rocky Gap (White Sulphur Springs) campaign, federal columns repeatedly pushed through Huntersville, confiscating any remaining livestock, horse feed, and flour. Confederate pickets could only offer skirmish-and-retreat delaying actions.
November 1863 (The Droop Mountain Campaign)
In early November 1863, Averell moved south in force with over 5,000 cavalry, mounted infantry, and artillery:
- Securing the Hub: Averell’s cavalry swept into Huntersville on November 4–5, 1863, driving Jackson’s forces down toward Mill Point and setting the stage for the climactic Battle of Droop Mountain on November 6.
- Secondary Incineration: Federal troops torched the remaining Confederate logistics infrastructure in Huntersville, including:
- Barracks, stables, and forage barns used by cavalry and wagon teams.
- Field blacksmith shops and repair facilities.
- Any commercial building holding residual grain, meal, or leather stock.
Physical Toll on the Town vs. the Courthouse Square
The cumulative raids effectively dismantled Huntersville's pre-war commercial network:
| Structure / Sector | Wartime Outcome | Post-War Condition |
| Confederate Storehouses & Depots | Burned completely by federal detachments in January 1862 and November 1863. | Obliterated; never rebuilt for government use. |
| Rebuilt 1850s Commercial Stores | Plundered, requisitioned, and largely burned or dismantled for fuel. | Scarred ruins; only a handful of merchant structures limped into the late 1860s. |
| Antebellum Hotels & Boarding Houses | Used as military hospitals and cantonment housing; heavily damaged or destroyed. | Hospitality capacity reduced to small private boarding houses. |
| 1824 Peter McClain Brick Courthouse | Used as a hospital, staging post, and barracks; interior woodwork heavily abused, but masonry structure survived. | Repaired and remained active as the county seat until 1891. |
Immediate Next Steps for Verification
- Review the War of the Rebellion: Official Records: Inspect Series I, Volume 5, pp. 493–495 for General Robert H. Milroy’s and Major George Webster’s official after-action reports dated January 1862 detailing the destruction of the Huntersville storehouses.
- Examine Post-War Southern Claims Commission Records: Check filed petitions in the National Archives (Record Group 217) by Pocahontas County citizens for stores and forage confiscated by Union troops during the January 1862 and November 1863 raids.
- Cross-Check 1865–1866 County Tax Forgiveness: Inspect County Court Order Books for exonerations and reassessments granted to Huntersville property owners whose business houses were burned during the military occupation.
-----------------------------
The winter of 1852 brought one of the most destructive civilian catastrophes in the antebellum history of Huntersville, sweeping through the dense wooden commercial core that had grown along the town’s main street and Knapps Creek drainage.
The Townscape on the Eve of the Fire
By 1852, Huntersville was the uncontested commercial, judicial, and social capital of Pocahontas County. Surrounding Peter McClain's 1824 brick courthouse was a thriving, tightly packed frontier village:
- Commercial Establishments: General mercantile stores supplying livestock drovers, hunters, and farm families from across the Greenbrier Valley.
- Hospitality: Two multi-story hotels catering to traveling circuit judges, visiting attorneys, and turnpike stagecoach travelers, housing taverns and public meeting parlors.
- Crafts & Trades: Small shops lining the street, including a resident physician's office, a harness and saddle maker, a tailor, and blacksmith operations.
- Structural Vulnerability: Nearly every commercial and residential building in town—unlike the heavy brick courthouse—was constructed of seasoned, hand-hewn native timber framing, clad in lap siding and topped with split-oak shake roofs.
The Fire and Its Spread
During the cold winter months of 1852, when heating stoves and open wood-burning fireplaces operated continuously against mountain freezes, a fire ignited in the business district.
- Spread of the Conflagration: Driven by winter winds and fed by wood-frame construction, the fire jumped from structure to structure. Without organized municipal fire equipment or high-pressure water mains, bucket brigades hauling water from nearby Knapps Creek and local wells were overwhelmed by the radiant heat.
- Property Losses: The fire wiped out virtually the entire active business district. Among the primary losses recorded in county lore and William T. Price’s historical sketches were:
- The Craig Residence: A prominent town home in the commercial core.
- Two Primary Mercantile Stores: Containing the bulk of the community’s dry goods, winter trade inventory, and commercial staples.
- A Historic Hotel Complex: Destroying guest rooms, dining halls, and town gathering spaces.
Why the Courthouse Survived
While the fire reduced most of the town's commercial street front to ash, Peter McClain’s 1822–1824 Courthouse remained standing intact:
- The Courthouse Square Buffer: Col. John Bradshaw’s original 1822 donation of the public common provided an open grassland perimeter that physically isolated the civic hall from the adjacent row of commercial wood-frame facades.
- Masonry Barrier: The courthouse had been built of multi-wythe load-bearing brick fired locally, resting upon a hand-dressed native sandstone foundation. When radiant heat and windblown cinders swept across the square, the brick envelope resisted ignition.
- Citizen Defense: Townspeople and merchants, recognizing that the courthouse held the land patents, marriage registers, and legal dockets of the entire county, concentrated their salvage and defense efforts on wetting down the building's roof eaves and window frames.
Aftermath and Historical Significance
The 1852 fire reshaped Huntersville's built environment. Property owners cleared the charred lots and rebuilt along the main road, but the loss of commercial capital set the village back economically on the eve of the Civil War.
The disaster highlighted the durability of the brick courthouse, which continued to serve as the administrative anchor of Pocahontas County for nearly forty more years until the county seat relocated to Marlinton following the December 1891 referendum.
Immediate Next Steps for Verification
- Review Local Historical Sketches: Check William T. Price’s Historical Sketches of Pocahontas County (1901) for first-hand oral accounts of the 1852 blaze, specifically regarding which hotel owner and merchants suffered the direct losses.
- Examine 1852–1853 Tax Assessments: Inspect the Pocahontas County land and personal property tax books in the West Virginia State Archives to verify post-fire valuation drops for parcels fronting Courthouse Square.
- Compare with the Civil War Fires (1861–1863): Cross-reference the 1852 burn zone against the later destruction wrought by Gen. Averell’s 1862 and 1863 federal raids on Huntersville’s supply depots.
-----------------------------
Following the winter fire of 1852—which consumed the commercial core along Knapps Creek, including the Craig residence, two primary mercantile establishments, and a hotel—Huntersville undertook an energetic, resilient rebuilding effort. Between 1853 and 1860, the village not only replaced its lost commercial infrastructure but consolidated its status as the uncontested economic, legal, and droving hub of Pocahontas County before the Civil War brought widespread military destruction.
Rebuilding Patterns and Architectural Shifts
Because the 1824 brick courthouse survived unharmed on its open public common, merchants and civic leaders had an immediate geographical anchor around which to rebuild.
- Timber Frame Rebuilding: With the fire clearing the dense streetscape, lot owners cleared away the charred debris and erected new multi-story wood-frame structures. While some builders utilized brick chimneys and stone foundations quarried from nearby hillsides, timber remained the predominant framing material due to local abundance.
- Separation and Setbacks: Taking cues from the disaster, post-1852 builders created wider separations and dedicated garden buffers between commercial facades and rear stables/kitchens to mitigate future fire leaps.
- Dual-Use Layouts: Rebuilt establishments typically adopted a common 1850s Appalachian commercial configuration: a wide storefront and commercial display floor fronting the street, with family quarters on the second floor and a kitchen/storage cellar below.
Commercial Establishments & Key Trades (1853–1860)
During this antebellum resurgence, Huntersville earned its regional moniker as a "little place with big ways," supporting a diverse merchant network that served not just the village, but seasonal cattle drovers traveling the turnpike and farmers attending monthly County Court days.
Mercantile & Dry Goods
- General Stores: Rebuilt dry goods merchants quickly restocked by ordering wagon freight via the Staunton and Parkersburg Turnpike corridor and Warm Springs routes.
- Trade Inventory: The stores stocked woolens, broadcloth, calico, hand tools, bulk coffee, sugar, salt, chinaware, ironware, and staple farm provisions.
- Barter & Frontier Commerce: While cash circulated on court days, stores operated heavily on credit and barter, accepting ginseng ("seng"), beeswax, dried venison, pelts, and farm grains in trade. Prominent town merchant families like the McCombs maintained commercial footholds along the main road that would persist through later generations.
Hospitality & Taverns
- The New Hotels: To replace the destroyed hostelry, new innkeepers stepped forward to build two-story frame taverns and boarding houses.
- Accommodations & Taverns: These establishments featured common dining rooms, private suites for the circuit judges and visiting lawyers, livery stables for turnpike travelers' horses, and saloons that became notorious centers of political argument and social gathering during court week.
Specialized Artisans and Crafts
As chronicled by Rev. William T. Price in his Historical Sketches of Pocahontas County, antebellum Huntersville maintained an impressive roster of resident tradesmen:
- Blacksmithing & Tool Forging: Village smiths—including ironworkers of the Wanless family (such as Ralph Wanless Jr. and his relatives) and later smiths working out of shops along the bridge road—forged broadaxes, mattocks, frows, coulters, horse gear, and plow blades.
- Harness & Saddle Making: Resident leatherworkers serviced the constant flow of pack teams, saddle mounts, and wagon harness gear required by mountain travel.
- Tailoring & Apparel: A village tailor provided custom broadcloth coats and wool clothing for the local professional class, supplementing homespun workwear.
- Medical Practice: Resident physicians operated apothecaries out of front-parlor offices, dispensing calomel, quinine, and botanical remedies to county residents.
Court Days and the Livestock Economy
The rebuilt business core reached peak volume during "Court Days"—the monthly magistrate sessions at the courthouse.
- Livestock Gathering Point: Farmers brought hundreds of cattle, sheep, and hogs to the Huntersville commons to assemble droves bound for eastern Virginia markets.
- Open-Air Market: The street and courthouse yard transformed into a bustling open-air exchange where peddlers sold hats, stoneware, handmade tools, harness leather, tobacco, and "thirty-cent whiskey".
- Social and Legal Nexus: Legal dockets drew litigants, estate executors, and witnesses, providing hotel dining rooms and general stores with their most lucrative revenue spikes of the year.
The Looming Interruption: 1861
The hard-won commercial recovery was short-lived. In late spring 1861, Virginia seceded, and Huntersville's strategic position along mountain turnpike intersections made it a primary Confederate supply depot and cantonment for General Loring’s command. The newly rebuilt hotels, stores, and warehouses were requisitioned for military quartermaster and commissary stores, setting the stage for Union cavalry raids under Gen. William W. Averell in 1862 and 1863 that left much of the town burned a second time.
Immediate Next Steps for Deepening Your Research
- Review 1850 vs. 1860 Census Schedules: Cross-reference Schedule 1 (Population) and Schedule 5 (Products of Industry) for Huntersville in the 1850 and 1860 U.S. Federal Censuses to map specific occupations, capital investments, and merchant names.
- Examine Virginia Land Tax Records: Review the 1853–1858 Pocahontas County land tax books (available on microfilm at the West Virginia Archives) to track the exact year rebuilt structures re-entered the county assessment roll.
- Trace Deed Book Transfers (1852–1855): Check County Deed Books for post-fire mechanic's liens, promissory notes, and parcel conveyances surrounding Courthouse Square following the fire.
---------------------------
The 1822–1824 Pocahontas County Courthouse at Huntersville was the first permanent seat of justice and administration in the county following its formation from Bath, Pendleton, and Randolph counties by the Virginia General Assembly in December 1821. Prior to its erection, the early county magistrates convened at the private log home and trading post of Col. John Bradshaw along Knapps Creek.
Commissioning and Construction History
- Site Selection: Col. John Bradshaw donated the public square for the new county seat, which was named "Huntersville" to honor the frontiersmen, trappers, and hunters who traded at the outpost.
- Contract Award: In November 1822, the Pocahontas County Court officially contracted local builder Peter McClain to erect both a permanent brick courthouse and a companion brick jail on the public square.
- Completion and Acceptance: Construction took under two years; both civic structures were formally inspected, approved, and accepted by the county commissioners in September 1824.
- Civic Role: The courthouse served as the municipal nucleus of Pocahontas County for nearly seven decades (1824–1891). In addition to judicial proceedings and county court business, it functioned as the primary community hall, hosting rotating Sunday services for local Methodist, Presbyterian, and Episcopalian congregations until a dedicated church/school was built in 1842.
Architectural Design and Structural Breakdown
Designed in the conservative, utilitarian Federal vernacular style characteristic of early 19th-century western Virginia public architecture, the courthouse prioritized symmetry, durable local materials, and clear sightlines over elaborate ornamentation.
[FRONT ELEVATION SCHEMATIC]
+-------------------------+
| SHINGLED GABLE |
| ROOFLINE |
+-------------------------+
| [#] [#] [#]| <-- Second Floor:
| 12/12 Wood Sash Windows| Jury Rooms / Offices
+-------------------------+
| [#] [=] [#]| <-- First Floor:
| 12/12 Center 12/12 Courtroom Bar,
| Sash Double- Sash Benches, Raised Dais
| Doorway |
+-------------------------+
| FIELDSTONE / SANDSTONE | <-- Hand-Laid Foundation
===========================
Foundation & Masonry
- Substructure: The building rested on a continuous, raised foundation of hand-dressed native sandstone and fieldstone gathered from the Knapps Creek drainage, mortared with local lime-and-sand binder.
- Brickwork: The exterior walls were load-bearing, multi-wythe masonry constructed from clay fired in temporary field kilns near the site. The brickwork was laid in a traditional bond pattern (typically Flemish or American common bond), providing structural stability against mountain freezes and moisture.
Massing & Fenestration
- Footprint: A compact, two-story rectangular block oriented toward the center of the town common.
- Openings & Millwork: The primary facade featured a symmetrical three-bay arrangement. Window openings were spanned by flat brick jack arches or hand-hewn oak/sandstone lintels, fitted with multi-pane double-hung wood sash windows (typically 12-over-12 or 9-over-9 light configurations).
- Roof & Cornice: The building had a medium-pitched side-gable or shallow hip roof framed with heavy, hand-hewn timber rafters joined with mortise-and-tenon joints, clad originally in split white oak wood shingles before later being covered in standing-seam sheet metal.
Interior Plan & Layout
- First Floor (Court Chamber): Dominated by an open, unencumbered courtroom chamber. It featured a raised judicial dais (bench) flanked by wooden witness and jury boxes, a partitioned bar for attorneys, and rough-hewn pine/poplar benches for spectators. Heavy timber girders supported the upper level.
- Second Floor: Divided into smaller administrative compartments, serving as jury deliberation chambers, record storage, and magistrates' consultation rooms. Heat was provided by brick chimneys and hearths located at the gable ends.
Wartime Stress & 1891 Decommissioning
- Civil War Depredations (1861–1863): During Confederate occupation of Huntersville under General William W. Loring and later Gen. Robert E. Lee’s Cheat Mountain campaign, the courthouse and courthouse yard were used as an active cantonment, hospital, and supply depot. While many adjacent wooden business houses burned during subsequent Union cavalry raids (including Gen. William W. Averell's sweeps), the brick courthouse survived.
- County Seat Removal: Following the December 1891 referendum that relocated the county seat six miles west to Marlinton along the planned C&O railroad line, the Huntersville courthouse was decommissioned. The primary courthouse structure was subsequently demolished and dismantled for salvageable building materials.
- Extant Artifacts on Courthouse Square: Today, the open field known as "Courthouse Square" in Huntersville preserves two physical remnants: the 1882–1884 Medina sandstone jail and the restored Old Clerk's Office (a small, brick-and-timber outbuilding used to shelter deed books and court dockets).
------------------------
Constructed simultaneously with the main courthouse in 1894–1895 by the Manley Manufacturing Company, the historic Pocahontas County Jail and Jailer’s Residence sits immediately behind (south of) the courthouse on the civic square. Designed to maintain stylistic continuity with Millard F. Giesey’s main judicial building, it translates the Victorian Romanesque Revival aesthetic into a functional, domestic-institutional municipal building.
Massing, Foundation & Exterior Envelope
- Stylistic Classification: Simplified Victorian Romanesque. While lacking the monumental twin towers of the courthouse, it borrows its primary masonry vocabulary—corbeled brick cornices, rough-faced native stone accents, and rhythmic fenestration.
- Foundation & Basement: Like the courthouse, the building rests on a raised basement executed in coursed, rusticated native Appalachian sandstone, terminating in a cut stone water table that deflects moisture and visually anchors the brick mass.
- Exterior Walls: Multi-wythe load-bearing red clay brick. The roofline is capped by a decorative, continuous band of bracketed corbel brickwork running directly beneath the eaves.
- Roofline Configuration: The core residence features a steep hip roof combined with an asymmetric, front-gabled projection across the western half of the north elevation. The gable end is detailed with partial returned cornices framing three slender, round-headed arched windows set into the attic gable wall.
[FRONT-GABLE ROOF] [HIP ROOF BLOCK]
+----------------+ +----------------+
| Partial Return | | Shallow Sloped |
| Cornice | | Metal/Asphalt |
+----------------+ +----------------+
| [n] [n] [n] | | Corbeled Brick|
| Arched Attic | | Bracket Band |
+----------------+---------------+----------------+
| [=] [=] [=] | [=] [=] [=] |
| Rough Sandstone Lintels / 1-over-1 Sashes |
+-------------------------------------------------+
| [=] [=] [=] | [=] [=] [=] |
| Heavy Rusticated Sandstone Sills |
+-------------------------------------------------+
| RUSTICATED SANDSTONE RAISED BASEMENT |
===================================================
Fenestration & Opening Rhythm
- North Facade Rhythm: The north facade (facing the rear of the courthouse) is divided into two distinct three-bay blocks (six bays total).
- Window Assemblies: Openings feature one-over-one double-hung wood sash windows.
- Masonry Dressing: Each standard window opening is framed with a heavy, rough-faced rectangular sandstone lintel above and a matching rock-faced stone sill below, echoing the first-floor trim of the main courthouse.
- Attic Arches: The three slender attic windows in the west gable feature round-headed brick header arches.
Interior Configuration & Spatial Division
In late-19th-century county seats, the resident jailer (frequently the sheriff or a appointed deputy) lived on-site with his family, managing administrative intake while family members prepared inmate meals:
- Residential & Administrative Wing (1895 Original):
- Main Floor: Contained the jailer’s office, public reception room, family parlor, and a large domestic kitchen equipped to service both the household and prisoners.
- Upper Floor: Residential bedrooms for the jailer’s family alongside secure holding rooms.
- Interior Finishes: Lath-and-plaster walls and ceilings, wide tongue-and-groove pine and oak plank floors, and molded Victorian architrave door and window casings.
- Basement Utility: Built with heavy timber floor joists pocketed directly into the perimeter sandstone walls, housing coal storage, original heating flues, and secure storage spaces.
The 1926 Cellblock Addition
By the mid-1920s, regional timber and railroad expansion overwhelmed the original holding capacity, prompting the Pocahontas County Court to authorize a major expansion:
- Structural Footprint: A two-story, shallow-hip-roofed brick ell projecting directly from the eastern elevation of the 1895 residence.
- Architectural Integration: The 1926 builders maintained the corbeled brick bracket band along the cornice to integrate the addition seamlessly with the 1895 block.
- Security & Cell Fabrication: The interior was fitted with heavy tool-proof steel cage cells, flat-bar steel lattice bunks, and gang-locking mechanical lever boxes.
- Exterior Security: Exterior sash openings in this eastern wing were permanently covered with heavy vertical tool-resistant steel bars anchored directly into the masonry jambs.
No comments:
Post a Comment