Search This Blog

MEMORANDUM

BEFORE THE COUNTY COMMISSION OF [COUNTY NAME] COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA

[PETITIONER / COMPANY NAME],

Petitioner,

v.

[NAME OF COUNTY] COUNTY SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY

AND THE COUNTY COMMISSION OF [COUNTY NAME] COUNTY,

Respondents.

PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF UNLAWFUL SOLID WASTE ASSESSMENT FEE

Comes now the Petitioner, [Petitioner / Company Name], by and through undersigned counsel, and respectfully submits this Petition for Administrative Review and Reconsideration to challenge the local solid waste assessment fee schedule enacted under Respondent County Solid Waste Authority Resolution/Ordinance No. [Number] and ratified by the County Commission of [County Name] County.

In support of this Petition, Petitioner states as follows:

I. PARTIES AND INTEREST OF PETITIONER

  1. Petitioner, [Petitioner / Company Name], is a [corporation / limited liability company / commercial motor carrier] authorized to do business in the State of West Virginia, maintaining its principal place of business at [Address, City, WV].

  2. Petitioner regularly transports and disposes of municipal solid waste at [Name of Landfill / Transfer Station Facility], a state-approved commercial solid waste disposal facility operating within [County Name] County, West Virginia.

  3. Respondent, [Name of County] County Solid Waste Authority (hereinafter "CSWA"), is a public corporate body organized pursuant to $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-3$.

  4. Respondent, County Commission of [County Name] County, is the governing body of [County Name] County, West Virginia, vested with statutory oversight over county fee assessments under Chapter 7 of the West Virginia Code.

II. STATEMENT OF FACTS

  1. On or about [Date Fee Schedule Adopted], Respondent CSWA passed Resolution/Ordinance No. [Number], which purported to establish a local option solid waste assessment fee in the amount of $[Amount, e.g., 0.75] per ton on all solid waste disposed of at commercial facilities within [County Name] County, effective [Effective Date].

  2. On or about [Date Commission Ratified], Respondent County Commission approved and ratified the $[Amount] per ton assessment fee schedule.

  3. Since [Effective Date], Petitioner has been assessed and required to pay the $[Amount] per ton fee upon delivering solid waste to [Name of Facility], resulting in an illegal surcharge of $[Excess Amount, e.g., 0.25] per ton over the maximum rate permitted by West Virginia statute.

  4. To date, Petitioner has paid approximately $[Total Amount Paid] under protest under the unlawful fee schedule.

III. STATUTORY FRAMEWORK AND LEGAL GROUNDS FOR REVIEW

A. The $[Amount] Per Ton Fee Explicitly Exceeds the Mandatory $0.50 Statutory Cap set by W. Va. Code § 7-5-22.
  1. West Virginia Code § 7-5-22 explicitly governs and restricts the authority of county and regional solid waste authorities to levy local disposal assessment fees. The statute unequivocally establishes a hard statutory ceiling:

    "Each county or regional solid waste authority is hereby authorized to levy a solid waste assessment fee... Provided, That the fee levied pursuant to this section shall not exceed fifty cents per ton or fraction thereof of solid waste..." ($W. Va. Code\ \S\ 7-5-22$, emphasis added).

  2. Respondents possess no statutory authority, inherent or delegated, to enact an administrative assessment fee that exceeds this mandatory fifty-cent ($0.50) per ton ceiling.

  3. An administrative agency or county instrumentality created by statute is strictly limited to the powers conferred upon it by the Legislature. Any rule, regulation, or fee schedule enacted by an agency that conflicts with or exceeds its statutory mandate is void ultra vires as a matter of law. See Appalachian Power Co. v. State Tax Dep't, 195 W. Va. 573, 466 S.E.2d 424 (1995).

B. Respondents Cannot Evade the Statutory Cap by Recharacterizing the Assessment Fee.
  1. To the extent Respondents contend the assessment fee above $0.50 per ton is authorized under general county health or administrative powers under Chapter 7 or Chapter 22C, state law explicitly preempts local fee creation where the Legislature has occupied the specific statutory field and established an express fee limitation.

  2. Because $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 7-5-22$ specifically addresses county solid waste disposal assessment fees, its express $0.50 per ton cap controls over any general administrative powers under the doctrine of specific statutory precedence.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that Respondents grant administrative review and enter an Order:

  1. RESCINDING AND REVISED Resolution/Ordinance No. [Number] to reduce the local solid waste assessment fee to an amount not to exceed the statutory ceiling of $0.50 per ton pursuant to $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 7-5-22$;

  2. CEASING AND DESISTING the collection or enforcement of any assessment fee portion in excess of $0.50 per ton against Petitioner and other facility users;

  3. ISSUING A REFUND OR CREDIT to Petitioner for all assessment fees collected in excess of $0.50 per ton since [Effective Date]; and

  4. Granting such other administrative or procedural relief as justice and equity require.

Respectfully submitted,

[PETITIONER / COMPANY NAME]

By Counsel

[Counsel Name, Esq.] (WV State Bar No. [#####])

[Law Firm Name]

[Street Address]

[City, State, Zip Code]

[Phone Number]

[Email Address]

VERIFICATION

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA,

COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME], TO-WIT:

I, [Representative Name], after being first duly sworn, depose and state that I am the [Title/Position] of [Petitioner / Company Name]; that I am authorized to execute this Verification on its behalf; that I have read the foregoing Petition for Administrative Review; and that the factual allegations contained therein are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.

[Representative Name]

Taken, subscribed, and sworn to before me this _____ day of __________________, 2026.

My Commission expires: ________________________.

Notary Public

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this _____ day of __________________, 2026, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Petition for Administrative Review was served via certified U.S. Mail, return receipt requested, upon Respondents at the following addresses:

[Name of County] County Solid Waste Authority

Attn: Board President

[Address]

[City, WV Zip Code]

County Commission of [County Name] County

Attn: County Clerk / President

[County Courthouse Address]

[City, WV Zip Code]

[Counsel Name, Esq.]

 

------------------------------------------- 

LEGAL MEMORANDUM

TO: Senior Legal Counsel

FROM: Regulatory & Municipal Law Practice Group

DATE: July 31, 2026

SUBJECT: Comprehensive Legal Analysis: Local Option Solid Waste Assessment Fees ($W. Va. Code\ \S\ 7-5-22$) vs. County Mandatory Collection Fees

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Under West Virginia statutory law, local government bodies and County Solid Waste Authorities (CSWAs) possess two distinct financial mechanisms to fund waste management and environmental programs:

  1. County Local Option Assessment Fees ($W. Va. Code\ \S\ 7-5-22$): A facility-level per-ton assessment (capped at $0.50/ton) levied on waste disposed of at landfills or transfer stations within the county.

  2. County Mandatory Service Fees ($W. Va. Code\ \S\ 7-1-3jj$ & $\S\ 22C-4-23$): A user/occupant fee charged directly to residential households or commercial entities for mandatory waste collection services.

Conflating these two distinct funding instruments is a frequent source of procedural and administrative error in local government practice. This memorandum analyzes the statutory authority, collection mechanics, Public Service Commission (PSC) interplay, and legal defenses associated with both fee structures.

II. COUNTY LOCAL OPTION ASSESSMENT FEES ($W. Va. Code\ \S\ 7-5-22$)

A. Statutory Authority & Cap

Under West Virginia Code § 7-5-22, each county or regional solid waste authority is authorized to impose a local solid waste assessment fee upon the disposal of solid waste at any facility within its county or region.

  • Statutory Rate Cap: The fee may not exceed $0.50 per ton (or fraction thereof) of solid waste disposed.

  • Collection Point: The fee accrues at the time of delivery to a solid waste disposal facility (landfill or transfer station) and is collected by the facility operator from the party delivering the waste.

B. Permissible Uses of Revenue

Proceeds collected under § 7-5-22 do not enter the general county fund. By statute, funds are strictly restricted and must be applied toward:

  • Reasonable administrative expenses of the local or regional solid waste authority (including necessary expenses of board members).

  • Refuse cleanup and illegal dump remediation programs.

  • Local litter control initiatives and recycling programs.

  • Other locally important solid waste management programs deemed necessary to fulfill authority duties.

C. Interplay with State Assessment Fees (§ 22-15-11)

The local option fee under § 7-5-22 operates alongside the state solid waste assessment fee under $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22-15-11$.

  • State law imposes a base assessment of $1.75 per ton plus an additional state surcharge reaching $1.00 per ton.

  • The State Treasurer remits 25% of the additional state surcharge equally among all CSWAs and 75% on a per-capita basis.

  • The § 7-5-22 local assessment fee is in addition to these state distributions.

III. COUNTY MANDATORY SERVICE FEES ($W. Va. Code\ \S\ 7-1-3jj$ & $\S\ 22C-4-23$)

Unlike a per-ton facility assessment, mandatory garbage collection fees are recurring charges imposed directly on property occupiers or owners.

A. Dual Statutory Enabling Framework

  1. County Commission Authority ($W. Va. Code\ \S\ 7-1-3jj$): Authorizes county commissions to enact ordinances establishing mandatory solid waste collection programs and setting reasonable, uniform service fees across unincorporated county areas.

  2. CSWA Rulemaking Authority ($W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-23$): Permits solid waste authorities to issue rules regulating waste streams and requiring property occupants to utilize authorized collection carriers.

B. The Statutory Self-Haul Exemption ($W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-10$)

Any local ordinance or CSWA rule imposing mandatory collection fees must recognize the statutory opt-out provision under $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-10$:

  • Residents and business owners cannot be forced to pay mandatory collection fees if they prove lawful self-hauling and disposal at an approved landfill/transfer station at least once every 30 days.

  • Attempting to assess or collect mandatory monthly service fees against a property owner who presents valid 30-day disposal receipts violates state law.

C. Collection & Lien Enforcement

  • Civil Delinquency: Unpaid mandatory service fees are subject to civil suit in Magistrate Court, accompanied by a statutory civil administrative penalty of $150 per year under $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-10$.

  • Municipal/County Liens: Where authorized by local ordinance, unpaid municipal or county collection fees become a statutory lien against the real property receiving service upon proper recording with the County Clerk.

IV. STATUTORY COMPARISON MATRIX

FeatureLocal Option Assessment Fee (W.Va.Code § 7−5−22)Mandatory Collection Service Fee (W.Va.Code § 7−1−3jj / § 22C−4−23)State Assessment Surcharge (W.Va.Code § 22−15−11)
Tax Base / UnitPer-ton disposed at landfillPer-household or per-business fixed monthly/annual ratePer-ton disposed at landfill ($1.75 base + $1.00 surcharge)
Maximum Rate$0.50 per ton maxSubject to PSC tariffs or county commission reasonableness$2.75 per ton total state assessment
Primary PayorWaste haulers / facility users at scaleProperty occupants / residential subscribersWaste haulers / facility users at scale
Collection PointLandfill weigh stationDirect billing / utility invoiceLandfill weigh station (remitted to State Tax Comm'r)
Self-Haul Opt-Out?No (applies to all waste dumped)Yes (30-day receipt rule under § 22C-4-10)No (applies to all waste dumped)

V. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION (PSC) INTERPLAY & LITIGATION RISKS

A. Pass-Through Rates for PSC-Regulated Motor Carriers

Commercial solid waste collectors operate under Certificates of Convenience and Necessity granted by the West Virginia Public Service Commission (Chapter 24A).

  • Under $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22-15-11(c)$, both state assessment fees and local § 7-5-22 county assessment fees are recognized by law as necessary and reasonable operating costs for motor carriers.

  • Carriers are legally entitled to pass these per-ton assessment fees directly through to end-use customers via PSC-approved tariff surcharge filings.

B. Administrative & Constitutional Vulnerabilities

  1. Unlawful Exceedance of the $0.50/Ton Statutory Cap:

    If a county or CSWA attempts to raise its § 7-5-22 local assessment fee above $0.50 per ton without explicit statutory amendment by the Legislature, the excess fee is illegal and subject to immediate injunctive relief and refund orders.

  2. Revenue Diversion to General County Operations:

    Funds raised under § 7-5-22 are legally earmarked exclusively for solid waste administration, litter control, and recycling. Siphoning these assessment proceeds into general county courthouse maintenance, law enforcement budgets, or non-waste infrastructure constitutes an illegal conversion of statutory trust funds.

  3. Preemption of PSC Tariff Authority:

    If a county commission attempts to fix curbside collection rates under § 7-1-3jj in an area serviced by a PSC-certificated motor carrier without coordinating with the PSC, the ordinance impermissibly conflicts with Chapter 24A state preemption.

--------------------------------------------------- 

LEGAL MEMORANDUM

TO: Senior Legal Counsel

FROM: Regulatory & Municipal Law Practice Group

DATE: July 31, 2026

SUBJECT: Comprehensive Legal Analysis: Enforcement Procedures and Defenses Under West Virginia Mandatory Solid Waste Disposal Law ($W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-10$)

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

West Virginia Code § 22C-4-10 establishes a statutory duty for all occupants of residences and operators of business establishments within the state to ensure lawful solid waste disposal. The statute sets forth a dual track of enforcement: civil administrative assessments (including unpaid fee recovery and statutory penalties) and criminal misdemeanor prosecution.

This memorandum outlines the procedural mechanics of state and local enforcement, analyzes the dual penalty structure, and examines substantive, procedural, and constitutional defenses available to respondents and criminal defendants.

II. STATUTORY MANDATE & REQUIREMENTS

Under $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-10(a)$, every person occupying a residential dwelling or operating a business establishment in West Virginia must satisfy one of two statutory compliance options:

  1. Mandatory Service Option: Subscribe to, utilize, and pay the established fees for an authorized solid waste collection service (typically a PSC-certified motor carrier or municipal service).

  2. Self-Haul / Proof Option: Provide proper proof of lawful solid waste disposal at an approved facility (landfill or transfer station) or in another lawful manner at least once every 30 days.

The Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Secretary is statutorily tasked with promulgating administrative rules regarding acceptable methods of supplying required proof.

III. ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES & PENALTY DUALITY

Enforcing entities—including County Solid Waste Authorities (CSWAs), county commissions, municipal code enforcement officers, and local law enforcement—utilize two distinct enforcement mechanisms under the statute:

                               ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────┐
                               │  W. Va. Code § 22C-4-10 Enforcement Tracks   │
                               └──────────────────────┬───────────────────────┘
                                                      │
                       ┌──────────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────┐
                       ▼                                                             ▼
         ┌───────────────────────────┐                                 ┌───────────────────────────┐
         │   Civil Administrative    │                                 │   Criminal Misdemeanor    │
         └─────────────┬─────────────┘                                 └─────────────┬─────────────┘
                       │                                                             │
      • Unpaid Back Service Fees                                      • Magistrate Court Prosecution
      • Statutory $150/Year Assessment                                • Criminal Fine: $50–$1,000
      • Municipal/County Liens                                        • 10–40 Hours Community Service

A. Civil Administrative & Financial Enforcement

  • Assessment Authority: County solid waste authorities or authorized collection entities may assess civil penalties against property occupiers who fail to subscribe to service or provide proof of independent disposal.

  • Statutory Civil Penalty: $150 per year assessed directly against the individual/entity not receiving collection services, in addition to all accumulated unpaid service fees.

  • Collection Mechanisms: Unpaid fees and civil assessments may be pursued via civil action in magistrate or circuit court, or reduced to municipal/county service liens against the subject real property depending on local enabling ordinances.

B. Criminal Misdemeanor Prosecution

  • Offense Defined: Failing to lawfully dispose of solid waste or failing to present adequate proof of lawful monthly disposal constitutes a misdemeanor criminal offense.

  • Jurisdiction: Prosecuted in Magistrate Court (or Municipal Court where local ordinances incorporate state code provisions) via criminal citation or complaint issued by law enforcement or solid waste enforcement officers.

  • Penalties Upon Conviction:

    • Criminal fine of $50 to $1,000.

    • Mandatory community service of 10 to 40 hours (typically litter cleanup).

    • Or both a criminal fine and community service.

IV. PROCEDURAL & SUBSTANTIVE DEFENSES

Defendants or respondents facing enforcement actions under § 22C-4-10 have several legal defenses available depending on whether the action is civil or criminal.

A. Substantive & Evidentiary Defenses

  1. Sufficiency of Self-Haul Receipts (The 30-Day Rule):

    • Defense: The respondent produced valid disposal receipts or weight tickets from a state-approved landfill, transfer station, or recycling facility covering the relevant statutory periods.

    • Standard: The statute requires proof of disposal at least once within every 30-day period. Showing receipts dated within 30-day increments creates a complete statutory defense against both civil assessments and criminal charges.

  2. Occupancy Status / Lack of Waste Generation:

    • Defense: The individual or business did not "occupy" the property or operate an active business establishment during the charged period (e.g., vacant land, abandoned structure, seasonal vacancy).

    • Burden: $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-10(a)$ specifically limits its mandate to persons occupying a residence or operating a business establishment. Demonstrating non-occupancy or structural uninhabitability defeats the applicability of the statute.

  3. Lawful On-Site / Alternative Agricultural Disposal:

    • Defense: Lawful management under agricultural exemptions or DEP-approved composting/recycling methods. Certain bona fide agricultural activities disposal practices carry explicit statutory or administrative exemptions under general WV DEP environmental regulations ($W. Va. Code\ \text{Ch.}\ 22-15$).

B. Procedural & Constitutional Defenses

  1. Due Process & Notice Deficiencies:

    • Defense: Failure of the enforcing authority to provide adequate administrative notice, itemized fee billing, or a pre-penalty opportunity to submit proof of disposal.

    • Application: In civil penalty enforcement, administrative due process requires clear notice of alleged delinquency and a reasonable window to present self-haul receipts prior to levying annual $150 assessments.

  2. Statute of Limitations (Criminal vs. Civil):

    • Criminal Misdemeanor: Subject to West Virginia's 1-year statute of limitations for misdemeanor prosecutions ($W. Va. Code\ \S\ 61-11-9$). Offenses alleged to have occurred more than 12 months prior to the filing of the citation/complaint are time-barred.

    • Civil Action: Subject to civil statutory limitations governing contractual or statutory liabilities ($W. Va. Code\ \S\ 55-2-6$ / $\S\ 55-2-12$).

  3. Burden of Proof (Criminal Proceedings):

    • Defense: In a criminal prosecution, the state/prosecution must prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt, including the negative assertion that the defendant did not dispose of waste or provide proof.

    • Tactical Note: While the statute creates a record-keeping requirement for self-haulers, criminal due process prevents shifting the ultimate burden of proof regarding illegal dumping onto the criminal defendant.

V. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COUNSEL

                    STEPS TO DEFEND A § 22C-4-10 ENFORCEMENT ACTION
                                
 ┌──────────────────────┐    ┌──────────────────────┐    ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ 1. AUDIT RECEIPTS    │───►│ 2. VERIFY OCCUPANCY  │───►│ 3. CHALLENGE NOTICE  │
 │ Collect weigh slips  │    │ Establish dates of   │    │ Verify 30-day notice │
 │ & landfill receipts  │    │ vacancy/non-use      │    │ & procedural due process│
 └──────────────────────┘    └──────────────────────┘    └──────────────────────┘
  1. Audit Landfill / Transfer Station Slips Immediately: Counsel representing property owners should immediately compile all commercial landfill weigh slips, transfer station receipts, or recycling logs. Receipts need not match weekly curbside volumes; they need only demonstrate lawful disposal once per 30-day window.

  2. Establish Property Vacancy: For real estate owners facing assessments on vacant rentals or undeveloped tracts, obtain utility records (electric/water usage) showing zero consumption to disprove statutory "occupancy".

  3. Challenge Dual-Penalty Overreach: If an authority attempts to levy civil $150 annual penalties while simultaneously pursuing criminal misdemeanor charges for the same historical time period, challenge the duplicative enforcement on procedural due process and statutory construction grounds.

-----------------------------------------

IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF [COUNTY NAME] COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA,

Complainant,

v.

[DEFENDANT NAME],

Defendant.

Case No.: [Insert Case/Citation No.]

Charge: Failure to Provide Proof of Solid Waste Disposal ($W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-10$)

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS CRIMINAL CITATION

Comes now the Defendant, [Defendant Name], by and through undersigned counsel, and respectfully moves this Honorable Court to dismiss with prejudice the pending criminal misdemeanor citation/complaint filed pursuant to West Virginia Code § 22C-4-10.

In support of this Motion, Defendant states as follows:

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

  1. On or about [Date Citation Issued], Defendant was issued a criminal citation charging a misdemeanor violation of $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-10$ for alleged failure to maintain mandatory solid waste collection service or provide proof of proper solid waste disposal for the time period covering [Start Date] through [End Date].

  2. For the period extending from [Start Date] through [End Date], Defendant lawfully disposed of solid waste generated at Defendant’s residence/business via self-hauling to an approved disposal facility in full compliance with the statutory 30-day mandate. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are true, correct, and verified copies of landfill weigh slips/disposal receipts covering this duration.

  3. Furthermore, a substantial portion of the alleged violations asserted in the Citation/Complaint occurred prior to [Date 1 Year Prior to Citation Date], exceeding the statutory period of limitations for misdemeanor prosecutions under West Virginia law.

II. LEGAL ARGUMENT

A. The Citation Must Be Dismissed Because Defendant Fully Complied with the Statutory Self-Haul Exception Under W. Va. Code § 22C-4-10.

Under $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-10(a)$, an occupant of a residence or operator of a business establishment satisfies their statutory obligation by either subscribing to an authorized solid waste collection service OR providing proper proof of personal solid waste disposal at an approved facility at least once every thirty days.

As demonstrated by the attached verified receipts (Exhibit A), Defendant personally hauled and disposed of solid waste at [Name of Landfill or Transfer Station], a facility approved by the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, at intervals meeting or exceeding the 30-day statutory threshold throughout the relevant timeframe. Because Defendant fulfilled the explicit statutory alternative provided by the Legislature, no misdemeanor offense under $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-10$ occurred as a matter of law.

B. Allegations Predated by More Than One Year Are Absolute Barred by the Statute of Limitations Pursuant to W. Va. Code § 61-11-9.

Pursuant to $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 61-11-9$, a prosecution for any misdemeanor offense must be commenced within one (1) year after the offense was committed.

To the extent the criminal Complaint seeks to penalize or prosecute alleged non-compliance that occurred prior to [Date 1 Year Prior to Filing], those claims are time-barred by operation of law. The State is statutorily precluded from bringing a criminal proceeding for any alleged failure to produce disposal receipts predating the one-year limitation period.

III. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that this Honorable Court enter an Order:

  1. GRANTING Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss;

  2. DISMISSING the Criminal Citation and Complaint against Defendant under $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-10$ WITH PREJUDICE; and

  3. Granting such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.

Respectfully submitted,

[DEFENDANT NAME]

By Counsel

[Counsel Name, Esq.] (WV State Bar No. [#####])

[Law Firm / Practice Name]

[Street Address]

[City, State, Zip Code]

[Phone Number]

[Email Address]

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this [Day] day of [Month], 2026, a true and accurate copy of the foregoing Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Criminal Citation was served upon the Prosecuting Attorney for [County Name] County via hand-delivery / first-class U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

Office of the Prosecuting Attorney

[County Name] County Courthouse

[Address]

[City, WV Zip Code]

[Counsel Name, Esq.]

 ---------------------------------------------

LEGAL MEMORANDUM

TO: Senior Legal Counsel

FROM: Regulatory & Municipal Law Practice Group

DATE: July 31, 2026

SUBJECT: Statutory Authority and Procedural Framework for Enacting Mandatory Garbage Service Rules Under $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-23$

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Under $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-23$, County Solid Waste Authorities (CSWAs) in West Virginia possess explicit statutory delegated authority to establish mandatory solid waste collection and disposal rules, regulations, and fee structures within their territorial jurisdictions.

However, a CSWA is an administrative agency of the state—not a general legislative body with inherent police power. Consequently, enacting enforceable mandatory collection ordinances requires strict adherence to statutory delegation boundaries, Public Service Commission (PSC) rate regulation, formal notice and public hearing rules, and County Commission concurrence.

II. STATUTORY SCOPE & DELEGATED POWERS UNDER § 22C-4-23

Section 22C-4-23 grants CSWAs broad authority to regulate solid waste management within the county, specifically authorizing the board to:

  1. Promulgate Operational Rules: Issue rules and regulations governing the storage, collection, transportation, processing, and disposal of solid waste within the county.

  2. Establish Mandatory Service Standards: Require residences and commercial establishments within designated service areas to utilize approved collection services or demonstrate lawful alternative disposal under $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-10$.

  3. Fix and Collect Schedule Fees: Establish reasonable fees, rates, and charges for solid waste management services provided by or through the authority.

  4. Designate Service Areas: Create distinct service districts based on population density, geographic feasibility, and existing motor carrier coverage.

III. PROCEDURAL MECHANICS OF ENACTMENT

For a mandatory garbage service ordinance or rule enacted by a CSWA to withstand judicial review, the board must execute a structured, step-by-step administrative procedure:

                  PROCEDURAL ROADMAP FOR ENACTING CSWA MANDATORY RULES
                                
 ┌──────────────────────┐    ┌──────────────────────┐    ┌──────────────────────┐
 │ 1. DRAFT RULE &      │───►│ 2. PUBLIC NOTICE &   │───►│ 3. BOARD ADOPTION    │
 │ SERVICE AREA BOUNDS  │    │ 30-DAY COMMENT       │    │ Formal Board Vote &  │
 │ Designate districts  │    │ Class II Legal Ad    │    │ Finding of Necessity │
 └──────────────────────┘    └──────────────────────┘    └──────────────────────┘
                                                                    │
 ┌──────────────────────┐    ┌──────────────────────┐               │
 │ 5. PSC / RATE        │◄───│ 4. COUNTY COMMISSION │◄──────────────┘
 │ REGULATORY CONCUR    │    │ APPROVAL (IF REQ.)   │
 │ Certificate sync     │    │ Ordinance adoption   │
 └──────────────────────┘    └──────────────────────┘

Step 1: Drafting & Geographical Definition

The CSWA board drafts the proposed ordinance/rule, defining the specific geographic boundaries where mandatory collection will apply. The rule must explicitly incorporate the statutory self-haul exemption ($W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-10$), allowing property occupiers to opt out by submitting landfill/transfer station receipts every 30 days.

Step 2: Public Notice and Comment Period

  • Statutory Notice: Pursuant to West Virginia administrative practice and $W. Va. Code\ \text{Ch.}\ 59-3$, the CSWA must publish a Class II-0 legal advertisement (once a week for two consecutive weeks) in a qualified local newspaper.

  • Public Hearing: The notice must specify a public hearing date (held at least 14 to 30 days after first publication) and establish a formal written comment period for county residents and commercial entities.

Step 3: Formal Board Adoption

Following the public hearing and consideration of public comments, the CSWA board must convene in an open meeting compliant with the West Virginia Open Governmental Proceedings Act ($W. Va. Code\ \S\ 6-9A-1\ \text{et seq.}$) to formally adopt the resolution or rule.

Step 4: Inter-Governmental Coordination with County Commission

While CSWAs have independent rulemaking powers under Chapter 22C, establishing mandatory service fees or property-indexed service liens typically requires the County Commission to adopt a parallel ordinance under $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 7-1-3jj$ or $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 7-5-22$ to grant local law enforcement and tax offices full enforcement authority.

Step 5: Public Service Commission (PSC) Harmonization

Under Chapter 24A of the West Virginia Code, commercial motor carriers collecting solid waste operate under Certificates of Convenience and Necessity granted by the W. Va. Public Service Commission.

  • A CSWA cannot override PSC-approved collection rates or certificate territory boundaries.

  • Mandatory collection rules passed under § 22C-4-23 must utilize existing PSC-certified carriers or municipal collection systems operating within their pre-approved tariffs.

IV. LEGAL VULNERABILITIES & GROUNDS FOR CHALLENGE

Opponents or property owners challenging a mandatory service rule enacted under § 22C-4-23 generally rely on three main legal grounds:

A. Administrative Ultra Vires (Exceeding Statutory Authority)

If a CSWA rule attempts to force residents into a mandatory contract without recognizing the 30-day self-haul proof alternative under $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-10$, the rule violates state statute and is void ultra vires.

B. Preemption by PSC Jurisdiction

If a CSWA attempts to fix commercial garbage rates directly rather than adopting existing PSC-cleared tariffs, the rule impermissibly encroaches on the exclusive jurisdiction of the West Virginia Public Service Commission under $W. Va. Code\ \text{Ch.}\ 24A$.

C. Procedural Deficiencies under Sunshine & Notice Laws

Failure to properly publish Class II legal notices, failure to provide the full draft for public inspection prior to the hearing, or voting on the measure in an executive session violates $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 6-9A-1\ \text{et seq.}$, rendering the resulting ordinance invalid.

V. SUMMARY COMPARISON: CSWA vs. COUNTY COMMISSION POWERS

FeatureCSWA Rule (W.Va.Code § 22C−4−23)County Commission Ordinance (W.Va.Code § 7−1−3jj)
Primary FocusEnvironmental solid waste planning & facility coordinationGeneral county public health & welfare enforcement
Enforcement PowersCivil administrative assessments ($150/yr) & PSC referralsLocal law enforcement citations & direct property service liens
Mandatory Self-Haul Opt-OutRequired by state law under § 22C-4-10Required by state law under § 22C-4-10
Rate ApprovalSubject to PSC tariffs / state siting boardSubject to PSC tariffs / county budget approval
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF [COUNTY NAME] COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA

[PETITIONER NAME / CITIZENS GROUP],

Petitioner,

v.

[NAME OF COUNTY] COUNTY SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY,

a public corporation,

Respondent.

Civil Action No.: ______________

Judge: _______________________

VERIFIED PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Comes now the Petitioner, [Petitioner Name], by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to the West Virginia Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 55-13-1\ \text{et seq.}$, and Rule 57 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure, and brings this Petition for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief against Respondent, [Name of County] County Solid Waste Authority.

In support of this Petition, Petitioner respectfully states as follows:

I. PARTIES AND JURISDICTION

  1. Petitioner, [Petitioner Name], is a citizen, taxpayer, and property owner residing within [County Name] County, West Virginia, at [Street Address, City, WV].

  2. Respondent, [Name of County] County Solid Waste Authority (hereinafter "CSWA"), is a public corporate body and government instrumentality created pursuant to $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-3$.

  3. Jurisdiction and venue are proper in this Court pursuant to $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 55-13-1$ and $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 14-2-2$, as Respondent maintains its principal office and enacted the challenged administrative rule/ordinance within [County Name] County, West Virginia.

II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

  1. On or about [Date Ordinance Passed], Respondent CSWA purported to enact and promulgate Ordinance / Rule No. [Ordinance Number], titled "[Title of Ordinance]" (hereinafter "Mandatory Ordinance").

  2. The Mandatory Ordinance attempts to mandate universal commercial waste collection, fix mandatory collection service fees, and restrict individual self-hauling within [County Name] County.

  3. Respondent enacted the Mandatory Ordinance without publishing a statutory Class II-0 legal advertisement in a qualified newspaper 14 days prior to its public meeting, in direct violation of state notice standards ($W. Va. Code\ \text{Ch.}\ 59-3$).

  4. Furthermore, Respondent failed to post the full text of the proposed rule for public inspection prior to the public hearing, precluding affected citizens from reviewing or providing meaningful public comment.

  5. The Mandatory Ordinance also purports to override and reassign exclusive collection territory boundaries and rates previously established by the Public Service Commission of West Virginia (PSC) under Certificates of Convenience and Necessity granted to commercial motor carriers pursuant to Chapter 24A of the West Virginia Code.

III. CAUSES OF ACTION

COUNT I: INVALIDITY DUE TO PSC PREEMPTION (Exceeding Statutory Authority)
  1. Petitioner realleges and incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1 through 8 as if set forth fully herein.

  2. Chapter 24A of the West Virginia Code confers exclusive and plenary jurisdiction upon the West Virginia Public Service Commission (PSC) to regulate commercial motor carriers of solid waste, including rate-setting, territory certification, and franchise service boundaries.

  3. Under $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-23$, a County Solid Waste Authority has limited authority to coordinate waste planning, but lacks legislative power to alter PSC-approved collection rates or reallocate pre-existing motor carrier certificate boundaries.

  4. By fixing direct mandatory fees and altering service boundaries without PSC approval, Respondent acted ultra vires and invaded the preemptive statutory jurisdiction of the PSC.

  5. Consequently, Ordinance No. [Ordinance Number] is void ab initio as a matter of law.

COUNT II: PROCEDURAL INVALIDITY (Violation of Mandatory Notice & Rulemaking Procedures)
  1. Petitioner realleges and incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1 through 13 as if set forth fully herein.

  2. Public administrative bodies created under $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-1\ \text{et seq.}$ must strictly adhere to statutory due process, public notice, and open meeting requirements when enacting rules of general applicability.

  3. Respondent failed to publish the required Class II legal notice under $W. Va. Code\ \text{Ch.}\ 59-3$ and failed to provide a 30-day public comment period prior to enacting the Mandatory Ordinance.

  4. Due to these fatal procedural defects, the Mandatory Ordinance was adopted in violation of statutory rulemaking requirements and is invalid pursuant to West Virginia administrative law principles.

COUNT III: VIOLATION OF STATUTORY SELF-HAUL EXEMPTION (W. Va. Code § 22C-4-10)
  1. Petitioner realleges and incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1 through 17 as if set forth fully herein.

  2. West Virginia Code § 22C-4-10 explicitly guarantees property occupiers the right to opt out of mandatory curbside service by presenting proof of lawful disposal at an approved facility at least once every 30 days.

  3. Respondent’s Mandatory Ordinance fails to incorporate or respect this mandatory statutory opt-out provision, attempting instead to force mandatory fees on all residents regardless of self-haul compliance.

  4. Respondent lacks the statutory authority to override or eliminate rights explicitly conferred by the West Virginia Legislature under $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-10$.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully prays that this Court enter judgment in his/her favor and grant the following relief:

A. DECLARE that Respondent’s Ordinance / Rule No. [Ordinance Number] is invalid, void, and unenforceable because it is preempted by the exclusive jurisdiction of the West Virginia Public Service Commission under Chapter 24A of the West Virginia Code;

B. DECLARE that Ordinance / Rule No. [Ordinance Number] is invalid due to Respondent’s failure to comply with mandatory statutory notice, public comment, and administrative procedure requirements;

C. DECLARE that Ordinance / Rule No. [Ordinance Number] impermissibly conflicts with and violates $W. Va. Code\ \S\ 22C-4-10$;

D. ENTER a Preliminary and Permanent Injunction restraining Respondent, its board members, officers, and agents from enforcing or collecting fees under Ordinance / Rule No. [Ordinance Number];

E. AWARD Petitioner costs and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in this action; and

F. Grant such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

Respectfully submitted,

[PETITIONER NAME]

By Counsel

[Counsel Name, Esq.] (WV State Bar No. [#####])

[Law Firm Name]

[Address]

[City, State, Zip Code]

[Phone Number] | [Email Address]

VERIFICATION

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA,

COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME], TO-WIT:

I, [Petitioner Name], after being first duly sworn, depose and state that I am the Petitioner named in the foregoing Verified Petition for Declaratory Judgment; that I have read the Petition and know the contents thereof; and that the facts stated therein are true of my own knowledge, except as to matters stated to be upon information and belief, and as to those matters, I believe them to be true.

[Petitioner Name]

Taken, subscribed, and sworn to before me this _____ day of __________________, 2026.

My Commission expires: ________________________.

Notary Public

--------------------------------------- 

 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment

MEMORANDUM

BEFORE THE COUNTY COMMISSION OF [COUNTY NAME] COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA [PETITIONER / COMPANY NAME], Petitioner, v. [NAME OF COUNTY] COUNTY SOLI...

Shaker Posts