Analysis
This text is Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address, a masterpiece of rhetoric. Analyzing it by modern standards requires distinguishing between grammatical correctness and stylistic conventions that have evolved.
1. Grammatical Accuracy:
Overall: The grammar is overwhelmingly sound, even by today's standards. There are no fundamental errors in subject-verb agreement, pronoun usage, tense consistency, or basic sentence structure.
Punctuation:
Comma usage is generally correct but reflects a 19th-century tendency towards more frequent commas than often seen in minimalist 21st-century style (e.g., commas after introductory phrases like "upon this continent," or separating short clauses). However, this usage is still considered grammatically acceptable, just stylistic.
The final bracket ] appears to be an artifact from the source (like a webpage edit mode marker) and not part of the original text. It should be disregarded.
Word Choice & Usage:
"Four score": Archaic. Modern usage would be "Eighty-seven".
"brought forth": Formal and slightly archaic. Modern equivalents might be "established," "created," or "founded."
"hallow": Less common today but still understood. "Sanctify" or "make holy" might be used, but "hallow" carries specific connotations appropriate here.
"shall": Used correctly for formal pronouncements and determination. While "will" is more common in everyday 21st-century American English, "shall" is grammatically correct and adds weight here.
Sentence Structure: The sentences are often complex and feature multiple clauses. While grammatically correct, some modern writing guidelines might suggest breaking down longer sentences (like the third paragraph's main sentence starting "It is rather for us...") for easier readability in certain contexts (e.g., web content). However, for formal oratory, this complexity is acceptable and contributes to the rhetorical effect.
2. Compositional Integrity:
Structure & Flow: The address has impeccable logical structure:
Past: The nation's founding principles.
Present: The test of those principles (Civil War, the specific battle).
Present Action: The inadequacy of mere dedication ceremonies.
Future: The dedication required of the living to uphold those principles.
This progression is clear, coherent, and powerful.
Clarity & Conciseness: Despite complex sentences, the language is precise. Lincoln uses relatively simple vocabulary overall (with a few notable exceptions like "score," "conceived," "consecrate," "hallow"). It is remarkably concise for the depth of meaning conveyed.
Rhetoric: The text employs powerful rhetorical devices still effective today:
Parallelism: "government of the people, by the people, for the people."
Repetition: "nation," "conceived," "dedicated," "here."
Antithesis: "living and dead," "add or detract."
Anaphora: Repetition at the beginning of clauses (e.g., "we can not dedicate, we can not consecrate, we can not hallow").
Tone: The tone is solemn, formal, and deeply earnest, appropriate for the occasion and purpose. This level of formality is less common in everyday 21st-century communication but remains standard for significant public addresses or ceremonial texts.
Conclusion:
From a purely grammatical standpoint according to 21st-century rules, the Gettysburg Address remains highly accurate. Minor differences exist in stylistic preferences regarding punctuation frequency and certain word choices ("score," "shall"), but these are not errors.
Compositionally, its integrity is exceptional. The structure is logical, the message is clear (despite sentence complexity), and the rhetorical devices contribute powerfully to its enduring impact. While modern digital media often favors shorter sentences and less formality, the compositional techniques used by Lincoln remain models of effective, persuasive, and moving communication for formal contexts. It stands as a benchmark of concise, powerful, and well-structured prose across centuries.
Questions: Norman Alderman
Norman's Page on FB
304-799-7374
No comments:
Post a Comment