Composition Analysis

 Analyze this text for grammatical accuracy and compositional integrity according to the accepted standards of 21st century usage.

John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Output Sample 1

Okay, let's analyze John 3:16 (King James Version) based on grammatical accuracy and compositional integrity according to accepted 21st-century usage standards.

Text: "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."

Analysis:

1. Grammatical Accuracy (21st Century Lens):

   • Sentence Structure: The sentence is a complex sentence with multiple subordinate clauses. The structure [Main Clause], that [Result Clause 1], that [Purpose/Result Clause 2] is grammatically valid, but the repetition of "that" to introduce consecutive clauses of result/purpose feels somewhat heavy or archaic by modern standards. Contemporary usage might prefer restructuring, perhaps using "so that" for the second clause or rephrasing entirely (e.g., "...gave his only begotten Son, so that whoever believes..."). However, it's not strictly ungrammatical.

   • Pronoun: whosoever is an archaic pronoun. In standard 21st-century English, whoever is overwhelmingly preferred. Whosoever is grammatically correct within its historical context but reads as distinctly dated now.

   • Verb Forms: believeth uses the archaic third-person singular present indicative ending -eth. Standard 21st-century English uses -s, making the form believes. believeth is grammatically incorrect by today's standards, though perfectly correct for Early Modern English.

   • Modal Verb: The use of should ("should not perish") is grammatically acceptable. It expresses a contingent outcome or destiny. However, modern translations often use will or shall ("will not perish" / "shall not perish") to convey a stronger sense of certainty or promise, which might align more closely with common theological interpretations today. The use of should is not wrong, but perhaps less common or direct-feeling in this specific context in contemporary English.

   • Adjective/Participle: begotten is a past participle used correctly as an adjective modifying "Son." While grammatically sound, the word itself is archaic and primarily survives in liturgical or historical contexts like this verse. Modern English speakers rarely use "begotten" in everyday speech or writing. "Only Son" or "one and only Son" are common modern renderings.

   • Punctuation: The use of commas to separate the clauses is generally consistent with modern usage for setting off introductory elements and subordinate clauses in a complex sentence.

2. Compositional Integrity (21st Century Lens):

   • Clarity: The core meaning of the sentence is generally clear due to its familiarity. However, for someone unfamiliar with the KJV style, the archaic elements (whosoever, believeth, begotten) and the slightly convoluted structure (repeated "that") could potentially obscure immediate understanding or make it feel less direct than modern prose.

   • Flow and Style: The sentence possesses a distinct rhythm and formality characteristic of the KJV. This is often valued for its poetic or liturgical quality. However, judged purely by the standards of typical 21st-century prose (which often prioritizes directness and less ornamentation), the flow might feel slightly stilted or overly formal. The archaic vocabulary contributes significantly to this perception.

   • Word Choice: As noted, begotten, whosoever, and believeth are archaic. Perish and everlasting are perfectly acceptable words today, though perhaps slightly more formal or elevated than common alternatives like "die" or "eternal." The intensifier so followed by the result clause that ("so loved... that he gave") is standard and effective.

   • Conciseness: While not excessively wordy, the phrasing reflects the style of its time. Modern translations often achieve a similar meaning with slightly different, sometimes more concise, phrasing, largely by updating the archaic terms.

Conclusion:

John 3:16, as presented in the King James Version, contains elements that deviate from standard 21st-century grammatical usage and compositional style.

• Grammatically: The primary issues by today's standards are the archaic verb ending (believeth) and pronoun (whosoever). The sentence structure, while valid, feels slightly dated due to the repeated "that". The word begotten is grammatically correct but lexically archaic.

• Compositionally: The verse has a formal, rhythmic, and somewhat archaic style. While clear to those familiar with it, the archaic language and structure can reduce immediacy and directness compared to contemporary prose standards.

It's crucial to remember that this analysis judges Early Modern English (1611) by 21st-century standards. The text was grammatically sound and compositionally effective for its time and remains highly influential. The "inaccuracies" identified are features of linguistic evolution, marking the text as historical rather than inherently flawed.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------