From the Balcony to the Ballot Box
Okay, let's break down the likely reasons for balconies in churches in Pocahontas County, West Virginia, drawing on common historical practices:
Increased Seating Capacity: This is the most straightforward and common reason, applicable everywhere, including Pocahontas County. Balconies, sometimes called galleries, allowed smaller church buildings to accommodate more people, especially during well-attended services, revivals, holidays, or special events. Building upward was often more feasible or economical than expanding the building's footprint, particularly in hilly terrain.
Segregation (Racial): This is a significant historical factor, especially for churches built before or shortly after the Civil War. West Virginia, while joining the Union, was historically part of Virginia and had slavery and subsequent racial segregation.
Enslaved People: Before the Civil War, balconies were often designated seating for enslaved people attending services with their white enslavers.
Free Black People/Post-Civil War Segregation: After the Civil War and well into the 20th century, racial segregation was common practice. Balconies provided a designated, separate seating area for Black members of the congregation, keeping them apart from the white congregation on the main floor. This was a widespread practice throughout the South and border states like West Virginia.
Choir and Musicians: Balconies often served as choir lofts. Placing the choir and organ/musicians in a gallery at the back or sometimes sides of the church could improve acoustics (projecting sound over the congregation) and keep the main floor clear.
Social Stratification (Less Common): While less common or rigidly enforced than racial segregation, sometimes balconies might have been implicitly or explicitly for certain social groups (e.g., less affluent members, families with young children, or sometimes specific genders, though this was rarer).
Architectural Style: Certain architectural periods simply included balconies or galleries as a common feature, regardless of strict necessity.
In the context of Pocahontas County:
Given its location in West Virginia (a border state with a history tied to Virginia and slavery) and the typical periods when many older churches were built (19th and early 20th centuries), a combination of increased capacity and historical racial segregation are the most probable primary reasons for balconies in many of its older churches. The use as a choir loft is also very likely.
To know the exact reason for a specific church's balcony, one would need to research that particular church's history. However, these general factors provide the most likely explanations.
Slavery absolutely existed in Pocahontas County in the 1860s
Yes, slavery absolutely existed in Pocahontas County in the 1860s, although its scale and nature differed significantly from the large plantation systems found in eastern Virginia. Here's a breakdown of the situation:
Presence in 1860:
The U.S. Census of 1860 is the primary source for this period. According to the census, Pocahontas County had a total population of 3,958.
Of this population, 369 individuals were enslaved, representing about 9.3% of the county's total population.
There were 72 slaveholders listed in the county.
This indicates that while slavery was present and a recognized part of the county's economy and social structure, it was not the dominant feature it was in Tidewater or Piedmont Virginia. The average number of enslaved people per slaveholder was relatively small (around 5), suggesting smaller farms or households rather than large plantations.
Nature of Slavery in the Region:
Pocahontas County's mountainous terrain was generally unsuitable for the large-scale, labor-intensive cash crops (like tobacco or cotton) that drove plantation slavery elsewhere.
Enslaved people in Pocahontas County were likely involved in a variety of tasks:
Agriculture: Working on smaller farms growing grains, raising livestock, and performing general farm labor.
Domestic Service: Cooking, cleaning, childcare within households.
Skilled Labor: Some may have been blacksmiths, carpenters, or possessed other trades.
Local Industries: Potentially working in timbering or small-scale operations like grist mills.
The Impact of the Civil War and West Virginia Statehood:
Secession Crisis (1860-1861): Like much of western Virginia, Pocahontas County had residents with divided loyalties, though sentiment leaned more towards the Union than in eastern Virginia. The existence of slavery, even on a smaller scale, complicated these loyalties.
Wartime Disruption (1861-1865): The Civil War brought significant disruption. Pocahontas County saw military activity, including the significant Battle of Droop Mountain in November 1863. This conflict:
Disrupted the established social order, including the institution of slavery.
Provided opportunities for enslaved people to escape to Union lines or simply flee the chaos.
Made control over the enslaved population more difficult for slaveholders.
Formation of West Virginia (1863): Pocahontas County became one of the counties forming the new state of West Virginia, which officially separated from Virginia and joined the Union on June 20, 1863.
The debate over West Virginia statehood was intrinsically linked to slavery. To gain admission to the Union, West Virginia had to adopt a plan for gradual emancipation (the Willey Amendment). This amendment, part of the state constitution, meant that children born to enslaved mothers after July 4, 1863, would be born free (though potentially subject to apprenticeships), and others would be freed upon reaching certain ages.
This immediately changed the legal future of slavery within Pocahontas County, signaling its eventual demise even before the war's end.
Abolition in West Virginia (1865): Recognizing the direction the war was heading and the implications of the Emancipation Proclamation (though it didn't directly apply to the loyal state of West Virginia initially), the West Virginia legislature moved faster than the Willey Amendment required. On February 3, 1865, they passed an act abolishing slavery entirely within the state, effective immediately. This act freed the remaining enslaved people in Pocahontas County several months before the ratification of the 13th Amendment abolished slavery nationwide.
In Summary:
Slavery was a reality in Pocahontas County at the dawn of the 1860s, impacting the lives of nearly 10% of its population. It was characterized by smaller holdings and diverse labor rather than large plantations. The decade brought profound change: the disruption of war, the political separation from Virginia, the adoption of gradual emancipation upon statehood, and finally, the complete abolition of slavery by the new state government in early 1865. While less pervasive than in eastern Virginia, the institution and its eventual destruction were significant factors in the county's experience during this transformative period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History of racial separation and eventual integration in West Virginia after the Civil War.
Okay, let's discuss the complex history of racial separation and eventual integration in West Virginia after the Civil War. West Virginia's story is unique due to its formation during the war and its status as a border state with Appalachian cultural influences.
West Virginia's Unique Context:
Formation: West Virginia separated from Virginia in 1863 primarily over disagreements about secession and loyalty to the Union, not solely or even primarily as an abolitionist movement (though opposition to the planter class played a role). While it entered the Union as a "free" state, it did so under federal pressure (Willey Amendment requiring gradual emancipation), and it inherited many of the racial attitudes and some legal structures of Virginia.
Demographics: Compared to Virginia and the Deep South, West Virginia had a relatively small enslaved population concentrated in specific agricultural areas (like the Eastern Panhandle and Kanawha Valley). However, white supremacist attitudes were still prevalent among much of the white population.
Border State Ambiguity: It wasn't strictly Northern or Southern in its outlook. This created a somewhat less rigid, though still discriminatory, racial environment compared to the former Confederate states further south.
Post-Civil War & Reconstruction Era (Approx. 1865-1877):
Abolition and Initial Rights: The 13th Amendment abolished slavery nationwide. West Virginia ratified the 14th (citizenship and equal protection) and 15th (voting rights for Black men) Amendments. Initially, Black men gained suffrage and participated in politics, sometimes aligning with the Republican Party which dominated the state in the early post-war years.
Early Segregation: Despite formal rights, social segregation began almost immediately. Churches often split along racial lines, and informal separation occurred in public spaces.
Constitutional Change: The 1872 West Virginia Constitution, drafted after former Confederates regained political influence, reflected a step back. Crucially, Article XII, Section 8 mandated racially segregated schools: "White and colored persons shall not be taught in the same school." This enshrined educational segregation into the state's fundamental law.
The Era of Jim Crow (Approx. 1877 - Mid-20th Century):
Codification of Segregation: Following the end of Reconstruction and the national trend cemented by Plessy v. Ferguson (1896 - "separate but equal"), West Virginia enacted various Jim Crow laws, though perhaps less comprehensively than in the Deep South.
Education: Segregated schools remained the law, mandated by the state constitution. Black schools were consistently underfunded and provided with fewer resources compared to white schools. However, the state did establish institutions for Black higher education, notably Storer College (initially private, later state-supported, Harpers Ferry), West Virginia Colored Institute (now West Virginia State University, Institute), and Bluefield Colored Institute (now Bluefield State University, Bluefield). These became vital centers of Black education, culture, and resistance.
Public Accommodations: Laws and customs mandated segregation in transportation (waiting rooms, train cars), hospitals, prisons, cemeteries, and other public facilities.
Anti-Miscegenation Laws: Laws prohibiting interracial marriage were enforced.
Economic Factors & Nuances:
Coal Industry: The booming coal industry drew large numbers of workers, including African Americans migrating from the South and European immigrants. In company towns and within the mines themselves, economic necessity sometimes led to a degree of interracial contact and cooperation, particularly within unions like the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA), which officially had non-discriminatory policies (though local practices varied). However, Black miners often faced discrimination in job assignments (worst jobs, lower pay hierarchies) and lived in segregated sections of company towns.
Less Pervasive than Deep South: While firmly entrenched, Jim Crow in West Virginia was sometimes described as slightly less rigid or violently enforced compared to states like Mississippi or Alabama. Lynchings occurred but were less frequent than further south. However, discrimination and the threat of violence were constant realities for Black West Virginians.
Black Community Resilience: African Americans built strong communities centered around churches, schools, fraternal organizations, and businesses. They actively fought for better resources for their segregated schools and challenged discrimination where possible.
The Path to Integration (Mid-20th Century Onward):
Early Cracks: National events like World War II (the "Double V" campaign demanding victory over fascism abroad and racism at home) and President Truman's desegregation of the armed forces began to chip away at the foundations of segregation.
Brown v. Board of Education (1954): This landmark Supreme Court decision declared state-mandated segregation in public schools unconstitutional, directly challenging West Virginia's 1872 Constitution.
State Response: West Virginia's response was relatively moderate compared to the "Massive Resistance" seen in Virginia and the Deep South. Governor William Marland and State Superintendent W. W. Trent indicated the state would comply with the ruling. The Attorney General ruled that the state constitutional requirement for segregation was nullified by Brown.
Implementation: Desegregation began relatively quickly in some counties, particularly those with smaller Black populations or in more northern/urban areas. However, implementation was uneven and faced resistance in other areas, especially southern counties with larger Black populations and stronger historical ties to Southern culture. It was often a slow, county-by-county process, sometimes met with protests, school boycotts by white parents, and delays. Black teachers often faced job losses as schools merged, as white administrators were usually retained over Black educators.
Civil Rights Act of 1964 & Voting Rights Act of 1965: These federal laws were crucial. The Civil Rights Act outlawed segregation in public accommodations (restaurants, hotels, theaters) and employment discrimination, dismantling much of the legal framework of Jim Crow nationwide, including in West Virginia. The Voting Rights Act eliminated discriminatory practices that had disenfranchised some Black voters, although West Virginia did not have the same level of systematic disenfranchisement (like poll taxes or literacy tests used extensively in the Deep South) by this time.
Ongoing Challenges:
De Facto Segregation: While legal segregation ended, residential segregation often persisted due to economic factors, housing discrimination (redlining, restrictive covenants), and personal prejudice, leading to continued de facto segregation in schools and communities in some areas.
Economic Shifts: The decline of the coal industry disproportionately affected many communities, including integrated ones, sometimes exacerbating racial tensions over scarce resources.
Legacy: The legacy of underfunded Black schools and generations of discrimination created persistent economic and educational disparities that continue to affect communities today.
Conclusion:
West Virginia's journey from the Civil War through segregation and into integration reflects its complex identity as a border state born from conflict. While it embraced the Union, it also inherited and codified racial discrimination, most notably through constitutionally mandated school segregation. The rise of Jim Crow shaped life for decades, though moderated somewhat by economic factors like the coal industry. The state's response to Brown v. Board was less resistant than the Deep South, leading to a gradual, albeit uneven, process of school desegregation. Federal legislation in the 1960s dismantled the legal structure of Jim Crow. However, the legacy of segregation and ongoing socioeconomic challenges mean that achieving true racial equity remains an ongoing process in West Virginia, as it does across the United States. The resilience and activism of Black West Virginians in building institutions and fighting for equality were crucial throughout this entire period.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History of racial separation and eventual integration in Pocahontas County, West Virginia, after the Civil War
Okay, let's discuss the complex history of racial separation and eventual integration in Pocahontas County, West Virginia, after the Civil War. It's important to note that while Pocahontas County shared some characteristics with the broader South and Appalachia, its specific trajectory was influenced by its unique geography, economy, relatively small African American population, and West Virginia's distinct history.
Post-Civil War Context (Reconstruction and Late 19th Century)
West Virginia's Formation: West Virginia separated from Virginia during the Civil War, largely siding with the Union. However, loyalties were complex, especially in southern and eastern counties like Pocahontas, which had Confederate sympathizers and soldiers. This internal division influenced post-war dynamics.
Relatively Small Black Population: Compared to plantation economies further south or even eastern Virginia, Pocahontas County had a small enslaved population before the war. Post-war, the African American population remained relatively small compared to the white majority. They were often scattered or lived in small enclaves, sometimes associated with specific industries like timber or railroads.
Establishment of Segregation: Despite West Virginia's Unionist origins, the state and its counties, including Pocahontas, quickly adopted practices of racial segregation common throughout the South during Reconstruction and the subsequent Jim Crow era. This wasn't necessarily driven by a large ex-planter class (as in the Deep South) but by prevailing white supremacist attitudes.
De Facto Segregation: Social customs dictated separate spheres for Black and white residents. Intermarriage was prohibited. Social interactions were strictly governed by racial hierarchy.
De Jure Segregation: West Virginia's laws mandated segregation in certain areas. The state constitution eventually required separate schools for Black and white children. While Pocahontas County might not have had the resources for extensive separate facilities initially, the principle of segregation was established early on.
The Jim Crow Era (Early to Mid-20th Century)
Formalized Segregation: This period saw the hardening of Jim Crow laws and customs.
Schools: Pocahontas County maintained separate schools for its Black students. These schools, typical of segregated systems everywhere, were generally underfunded, had fewer resources, shorter terms, and lower teacher pay compared to white schools. Locating and maintaining these schools for a scattered population presented challenges. Examples might include small community schools or potentially a slightly larger one in a town like Marlinton if the population warranted it.
Public Accommodations: While perhaps less formalized than in larger cities, segregation likely existed in stores, waiting rooms (if train or bus stations existed), and potentially healthcare access, although the specifics are harder to document without local records. Social events were strictly segregated.
Economic Roles: African Americans often worked in labor-intensive jobs – timber industry (logging camps, sawmills like at Cass), railroad construction and maintenance, agriculture, and domestic service. While working alongside white laborers in some settings (like timber camps), social and residential segregation was usually maintained.
Key Institutions & Examples:
Denmar Sanitarium (State Tuberculosis Sanitarium for Negroes): Established in 1917 near Hillsboro, Denmar is perhaps the most prominent example of state-mandated segregation within Pocahontas County. Its location in a rural, relatively isolated area was typical for sanitariums but also served to keep the Black patient population separate. It operated as a segregated facility until 1957. This institution highlights how state-level segregation directly manifested in the county.
Timber Towns (e.g., Cass): Company towns like Cass, built around the large sawmill, often had segregated housing sections for Black workers and their families, alongside separate social facilities if any existed.
Black Churches and Communities: Despite segregation and limited numbers, African Americans built their own community institutions, primarily churches, which served as vital social, spiritual, and cultural centers. These provided resilience and a sense of identity in the face of discrimination.
The Path Towards Integration (Mid-20th Century Onward)
Brown v. Board of Education (1954): The Supreme Court ruling declared state-sponsored segregation in public schools unconstitutional. West Virginia, compared to Deep South states, moved relatively quickly towards compliance, although "all deliberate speed" still meant delays and local variations.
School Integration in Pocahontas County: Integration likely occurred gradually in the late 1950s or early 1960s. Given the small Black student population, this might have involved closing the separate Black schools and absorbing the students into the previously all-white schools. While West Virginia didn't see the massive resistance of states further south, the transition was unlikely to have been entirely without friction or challenges for the Black students entering previously segregated environments. Local attitudes and the leadership of school officials would have played a significant role.
Closure of Denmar (1957): The closure of the segregated sanitarium (partly due to advances in TB treatment, partly due to desegregation trends) marked the end of a major symbol of state-sponsored segregation within the county. It was later converted to a state hospital and then a correctional facility.
Civil Rights Act of 1964: This federal legislation outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, legally ending segregation in public accommodations, facilities, and employment. While enforcement varied, this provided the legal framework for dismantling overt Jim Crow practices in Pocahontas County businesses and public spaces.
Gradual Social Change: Legal integration did not immediately equate to social integration or equality. Deep-seated attitudes changed slowly. Economic disparities often persisted. Out-migration, affecting both Black and white populations due to economic shifts (like the decline of the timber boom), also reshaped the county's demographics and social landscape.
Summary:
After the Civil War, Pocahontas County, West Virginia, implemented and maintained racial segregation, mirroring broader patterns in the South and Appalachia, despite its unique West Virginia context and relatively small Black population. This separation was evident in schools, public life, and institutions like the Denmar Sanitarium. The transition to integration, spurred by national legal changes like Brown v. Board and the Civil Rights Act, occurred more gradually and perhaps with less overt conflict than in the Deep South, but it still represented a significant shift from decades of legally mandated and socially enforced separation. The legacy of this history involves the closure of segregated institutions, the integration of schools and public life, and the ongoing process of navigating race relations in a rural Appalachian setting.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History of voting in Pocahontas County, West Virginia, after the Civil War (post-1865)
Okay, let's discuss the history of voting in Pocahontas County, West Virginia, after the Civil War (post-1865). This period involves Reconstruction, the establishment of new political orders, racial dynamics, women's suffrage, and broader political realignments.
1. Reconstruction Era (Late 1860s - 1870s): A Tumultuous Start
West Virginia's Unique Position: West Virginia itself was born out of the Civil War, breaking away from Confederate Virginia. However, Pocahontas County, located in the Allegheny Highlands bordering Virginia, had significant Confederate sympathies. Many residents fought for the South.
Initial Disenfranchisement of Ex-Confederates: Following the war, West Virginia's government, initially dominated by Unionists (largely Republicans), implemented strict "Test Oaths." These required voters and officeholders to swear they had not voluntarily aided the Confederacy. In a county like Pocahontas with strong Southern ties, this meant a large portion of the white male population was initially barred from voting or holding office. This temporarily shifted political power to Unionists or those who had remained neutral or could plausibly take the oath.
The Rise of the Democratic Party ("Redemption"): Resentment over the Test Oaths was high among the disfranchised majority in counties like Pocahontas. The Democratic party campaigned vigorously for the restoration of voting rights to ex-Confederates.
The Flick Amendment (1871): This crucial state constitutional amendment effectively removed the restrictive Test Oaths, restoring suffrage to almost all white males, regardless of their Confederate service. This was a pivotal moment for Pocahontas County. It allowed the pre-war and wartime majority (those sympathetic to the Confederacy or Democrats) to regain political control. Pocahontas County quickly became, and would long remain, a Democratic stronghold.
African American Suffrage (15th Amendment, 1870): The 15th Amendment granted voting rights to Black men. Pocahontas County had a relatively small African American population compared to some other WV counties. While legally entitled to vote after 1870, their actual ability to exercise this right could be influenced by local pressures, economic dependency, and intimidation, although West Virginia did not implement the widespread, codified disenfranchisement schemes (like complex literacy tests or poll taxes specifically designed to exclude Black voters) seen in the Deep South. The small Black electorate likely voted Republican initially (the party of Lincoln and Union), but their numbers were generally not large enough to significantly challenge the overwhelming white Democratic majority established after the Flick Amendment.
2. Late 19th Century - Early 20th Century: Democratic Dominance & Local Politics
Solid Democratic Control: From the end of Reconstruction onwards, Pocahontas County consistently voted Democratic in most state and local elections. This reflected both its Confederate heritage and its rural, agricultural nature, aligning with the broader trends in the rural South and Appalachia at the time.
Local Factionalism: While the county was reliably Democratic, internal factions within the party often competed fiercely for local offices (sheriff, county commissioners, prosecutor, etc.). These contests could be intense, sometimes based on geography within the county, family ties, or specific local issues like road building or school funding.
Voting Practices: Elections were highly localized events. Turnout could be influenced by personalities, local debates, and traditional party loyalty. While overt violence or fraud might have occurred sporadically (as was common nationwide in this era), the established Democratic dominance meant elections often ratified the existing power structure. The small Republican party existed but rarely posed a serious threat in county-wide races.
3. The Progressive Era and Women's Suffrage (Early 20th Century)
Secret Ballot: Reforms like the introduction of the secret ballot (replacing publicly cast ballots) aimed to reduce intimidation and vote-buying, potentially making voting a more private and less pressured act.
Women's Suffrage (19th Amendment, 1920): The granting of suffrage to women doubled the potential electorate. In Pocahontas County, as elsewhere, women's initial voting patterns largely mirrored those of the men in their families and communities. It did not immediately disrupt the county's strong Democratic leanings. Women gradually became integrated into the political process, participating in party activities and eventually running for local offices.
4. Mid-20th Century: Stability and National Influences
New Deal Realignment: The Great Depression and Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal solidified Democratic loyalty in many rural areas, including Pocahontas County. Federal programs provided relief and infrastructure improvements, reinforcing the county's Democratic identity.
Continued Democratic Strength: Through World War II and the post-war era, Pocahontas County remained reliably Democratic in state and local politics. Presidential voting might occasionally show swings based on national candidates, but the local political machinery was firmly in Democratic hands.
Civil Rights Era: While the national Civil Rights Movement brought significant changes, its direct impact on voting procedures in Pocahontas County was likely less dramatic than in the Deep South, primarily because West Virginia lacked the state-level Jim Crow voting laws targeted by the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA). The VRA reinforced existing federal protections against racial discrimination in voting, ensuring access for the county's Black citizens, but didn't fundamentally alter the local political balance due to the small size of the minority population and the lack of state-mandated barriers like poll taxes at that time.
5. Late 20th Century - Present: Political Realignment
The Shift Towards the Republican Party: Beginning in the latter half of the 20th century and accelerating significantly in the 21st century, Pocahontas County, like much of rural West Virginia and Appalachia, underwent a major political realignment. This national trend saw conservative, rural, white voters increasingly shift away from the Democratic party and towards the Republican party.
Factors for Change: This shift was driven by national factors: the Democratic party's evolving stance on social issues (abortion, gun control), environmental regulations (particularly impacting resource-based economies like timber, though coal was less dominant in Pocahontas than southern WV), and a growing cultural divide between urban/suburban areas and rural America. National Republican campaigns increasingly resonated with the values and concerns of voters in places like Pocahontas County.
Modern Voting Patterns: Today, Pocahontas County is strongly Republican, particularly in federal and statewide elections. While Democrats might still hold some local offices or registrations due to historical inertia and local personalities, the county reliably votes Republican for President, Governor, US Senate, and Congress, often by large margins. This represents a dramatic reversal from the century of Democratic dominance that followed Reconstruction.
In Summary:
The history of voting in Pocahontas County after the Civil War is marked by:
An initial period of turmoil and disenfranchisement of the pro-Confederate majority during Reconstruction.
The swift restoration of suffrage to ex-Confederates via the Flick Amendment, leading to over a century of Democratic Party dominance rooted in its Confederate past and rural identity.
The expansion of suffrage to African American men and later to women, although these changes didn't immediately alter the county's political trajectory due to demographics and established loyalties.
A profound political realignment in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, driven by national trends, transforming the county from a Democratic stronghold into a reliably Republican area.
Throughout this history, local issues, personalities, and the county's distinct rural Appalachian character have always played a significant role alongside broader state and national political currents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Which came first in West Virginia: Voting Rights for Black men or voting rights for women
Voting rights for Black men came first in West Virginia.
Here's the breakdown:
Voting Rights for Black Men: The 15th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, prohibiting the denial of suffrage based on "race, color, or previous condition of servitude," was ratified nationally in 1870. West Virginia, as part of the Union, was bound by this amendment, legally granting Black men the right to vote that year. (West Virginia itself had ratified the amendment in 1869).
Voting Rights for Women: The 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, prohibiting the denial of suffrage based on sex, was ratified nationally in 1920. West Virginia ratified this amendment on March 10, 1920, and women across the state gained the right to vote when it became part of the U.S. Constitution in August 1920. (A prior state-level referendum on women's suffrage in 1916 had failed).
Therefore, Black men legally gained the right to vote in West Virginia 50 years before women did.
No comments:
Post a Comment