Working Conditions in West Virginia Coal Fields: An Overview

 

Living Conditions:

●

Company Towns: The sources describe a pervasive system of company-owned towns, where the coal company owns not only the mines but also the houses, stores, and essential services. This creates a situation where the company exerts significant control over miners' lives, even outside of work

.

●

Good vs. Bad Camps: While some companies provided decent housing, sanitation, and amenities like schools and Y.M.C.A.s, others offered substandard housing with inadequate sanitation and few amenities, contributing to discontent and a desire for collective action

.

●

"Check-off" System: This system, initially used by companies to deduct rent, store charges, and other fees from miners' wages, further solidified company control over miners' finances. While it later became a point of contention when unions adopted it for collecting dues, the system itself underscores the encompassing influence companies held over miners' lives

.

●

Scrip Payments: Many companies paid wages partially in scrip, redeemable only at company stores. This practice, though arguably violating state law, gave companies further control over miners' spending, limited their choices, and fueled resentment

.

●

Insecurity of Residence: The sources reveal the precarious living situation of miners, who lacked security of residence in company-owned housing. Evictions, sometimes forceful, were common, especially during strikes or for union activity, highlighting the power imbalance between operators and miners

.

Working Conditions:

●

Wage Discrepancies: The sources suggest that wages for miners, particularly those directly involved in coal extraction, were generally lower in non-union fields compared to unionized ones. The lack of standardized pay-by-the-ton systems in non-union mines, along with the absence of check weighmen, created opportunities for exploitation and fueled demands for union representation

.

●

Dangerous Working Conditions: Although not extensively detailed, the sources allude to the inherent dangers of coal mining, mentioning "awful catastrophes" and the need for safety measures like proper ventilation and timbering

. These dangers likely contributed to the miners' desire for collective bargaining to improve safety standards.

●

Suppression of Union Activity: The sources extensively document the aggressive tactics employed by some operators to suppress unionization efforts, including:

○

Hiring of Armed Guards: The use of private detectives, often armed, to intimidate and assault union sympathizers created a climate of fear and violence, further demonstrating the lengths to which some operators were willing to go to prevent unionization

.

○

"Yellow Dog" Contracts: These contracts, requiring workers to renounce union membership as a condition of employment, effectively established closed non-union shops and prevented miners from exercising their right to organize

.

○

Control over Law Enforcement: The payment of deputy sheriffs by coal companies created a system where law enforcement served the interests of the operators, further suppressing union activity through intimidation, arrests, and violence

.

The sources paint a vivid picture of the challenging working and living conditions faced by West Virginia coal miners in the early 20th century. The lack of basic rights, combined with the often-exploitative practices of some companies, fueled a bitter struggle for unionization and highlighted the need for significant reforms to improve the lives of these workers.