Did PVC or Vinyl "Jelly Shoes" Affect Hanover Shoe?

The petition filed by the employees of The Hanover Shoe Company in 1995.

• The petition was filed under Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974. This section allows workers to petition the U.S. government for certification of trade adjustment assistance if they believe increased imports are causing job losses at their company.

 The petition likely included information such as:

• • The number of workers affected by the alleged import-related job losses.
  • The specific product(s) being imported that the workers believed were causing the job losses.
  • The countries from which these products were being imported.
  • Data and evidence supporting the workers' claims.

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  The Impact of the "Jelly shoe" on the Shoe Industry 

  

  The impact of "jelly shoes," also known as PVC or vinyl shoes, on the shoe industry is multifaceted and can be seen in both positive and negative ways:

  Positive Impacts:

  • Affordability and accessibility: Jelly shoes were generally much cheaper than traditional leather or fabric shoes, making them accessible to a wider range of consumers, especially children and families with limited budgets.
  • Durability and practicality: The waterproof nature and easy cleaning of jelly shoes made them ideal for wet weather, outdoor activities, and environments requiring frequent cleaning, like beaches or hospitals.
  • Fashion and trends: Jelly shoes experienced several periods of popularity throughout history, particularly in the 1980s and 1990s, due to their vibrant colors, playful designs, and association with specific fashion trends. This led to increased sales and diversification within the shoe industry.

  Negative Impacts:

  • Environmental concerns: The production of PVC, the main material in jelly shoes, raises environmental concerns due to its use of non-renewable resources and potential for harmful chemicals during production and disposal.
  • Limited comfort and functionality: Compared to other shoe types, jelly shoes generally offer less breathability, support, and flexibility, which can lead to discomfort and potential foot health issues, especially with prolonged wear.
  • Perceived quality and image: In some cases, jelly shoes were associated with lower quality or a more casual image compared to traditional leather or fabric shoes, potentially impacting brand perception and consumer preferences for certain occasions.

  Overall, the impact of "jelly shoes" on the shoe industry is complex. While they offered advantages in terms of affordability, practicality, and trendiness, they also raised concerns about environmental impact, limitations in comfort and functionality, and potential negative perceptions in specific contexts. Ultimately, their lasting influence on the industry is debatable, as they remain a niche product compared to more established shoe types.